[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program...
From: |
Dora Scilipoti |
Subject: |
www/philosophy is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program... |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Nov 2020 03:33:43 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: Dora Scilipoti <dora> 20/11/02 03:33:43
Modified files:
philosophy : is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html
Log message:
Reworded by RMS to add link to saying-no-even-once.html. Add subtitles.
Make stray paragraph an author's note. Improve footnote. (www-discuss
2020-11-01).
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
Patches:
Index: is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html 27 Aug 2017 14:56:06 -0000
1.20
+++ is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.html 2 Nov 2020 08:33:42 -0000
1.21
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.94 -->
<title>Is It Ever a Good Thing to Use a Nonfree Program?
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include
virtual="/philosophy/po/is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program.translist" -->
@@ -7,11 +7,26 @@
<h2>Is It Ever a Good Thing to Use a Nonfree Program?</h2>
-<p>by <a href="http://www.stallman.org/"><strong>Richard
-Stallman</strong></a></p>
+<address class="byline">by Richard Stallman</address>
-<p>If you run a nonfree program on your computer, it denies your freedom;
-the immediate wrong is directed at you.(<a href="#footnote">*</a>)</p>
+<p>The question here is, is it ever a good thing to use a nonfree
+program? Our conclusion is that it is usually a bad thing, harmful to
+yourself and in some cases to others.</p>
+
+<p>If you run a nonfree program on your computer, it denies your
+freedom; the immediate wrong is directed at you(<a
+href="#footnote" id="footnote-rev"><sup>[*]</sup></a>).</p>
+
+<p>That does <em>not</em> mean you're an “evildoer” or
+“sinner” for running a nonfree program. When the harm
+you're doing is mainly to yourself, we hope you will stop, for your
+own sake.</p>
+
+<p>Sometimes you may face great pressure to run a nonfree program; we
+don't say you must defy that pressure at all costs (though it is
+inspiring when someone does that), but we do urge you to <a
+href="/philosophy/saying-no-even-once.html"> look for occasions to
+push back in smaller ways</a>.</p>
<p>If you recommend that others run the nonfree program,
or lead them to do so, you're leading them to give
@@ -26,6 +41,8 @@
the use of the nonfree software aims directly at putting an end to the
use of that very same nonfree software.</p>
+<h3>In the past</h3>
+
<p>In 1983 I decided to develop the GNU operating system, as a free
replacement for Unix. The feasible way to do it was to write and test
the components one by one on Unix. But was it legitimate to use Unix
@@ -52,6 +69,8 @@
reason, you should reconsider from time to time whether the need still
exists.</p>
+<h3>Nowadays</h3>
+
<p>However, there are other nonfree programs we still need to replace,
and the analogous question often arises. Should you run the nonfree
driver for a peripheral to help you develop a free replacement driver?
@@ -91,7 +110,7 @@
resist stretching it any further lest it turn into an all-purpose
excuse for any profitable activity with nonfree software.</p>
-<hr />
+<h3>Author's note</h3>
<p>Occasionally it is necessary to use and even upgrade a nonfree
system on a machine in order to install a free system to replace it on
@@ -99,13 +118,13 @@
arguments apply: it is legitimate to recommend running some nonfree
software momentarily in order to remove it.</p>
-
+<div class="footnote">
<hr />
-
-<p id="footnote">Footnote: Using the nonfree program can have
-unfortunate indirect effects, such as rewarding the perpetrator and
-encouraging more use of that program. This is a further reason to
-shun use of nonfree programs.</p>
+<h4>Footnote</h4>
+<p><a href="#footnote-rev" id="footnote">[*]</a> Using the nonfree
+program can have unfortunate indirect effects, such as rewarding the
+perpetrator and encouraging more use of that program. This is a
+further reason to shun use of nonfree programs.</p>
<p>Most proprietary programs come with an End User License Agreement
that hardly anyone reads. Tucked away in it, in most cases, is an
@@ -120,6 +139,7 @@
<p>However, we think that the truly moral path is to carefully reject
such agreements.</p>
+</div>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -168,7 +188,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 Richard Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2020 Richard Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/">Creative
@@ -178,7 +198,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/08/27 14:56:06 $
+$Date: 2020/11/02 08:33:42 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
- www/philosophy is-ever-good-use-nonfree-program...,
Dora Scilipoti <=