www licenses/po/license-recommendations.fr-en.h...

[GNUN]

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     19/12/28 08:31:41

Modified files:
        licenses/po    : license-recommendations.fr-en.html 
        philosophy     : free-doc.fr.html 
        philosophy/po  : free-doc.fr-en.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/license-recommendations.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-doc.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.74&r2=1.75
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.39&r2=1.40

Patches:
Index: licenses/po/license-recommendations.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/license-recommendations.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- licenses/po/license-recommendations.fr-en.html      27 Dec 2019 07:00:43 
-0000      1.37
+++ licenses/po/license-recommendations.fr-en.html      28 Dec 2019 13:31:41 
-0000      1.38
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
 <p>In these special situations, if you are aiming to convince
 proprietary application developers to use the library for the free
 format, you would need to make that easy by licensing the library
-under a weak licenses, such as
+under a weak license, such as
 the <a href="http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0";>Apache
 License 2.0</a>.</p>
 
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/12/27 07:00:43 $
+$Date: 2019/12/28 13:31:41 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>

Index: philosophy/free-doc.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-doc.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.74
retrieving revision 1.75
diff -u -b -r1.74 -r1.75
--- philosophy/free-doc.fr.html 6 Sep 2018 08:58:26 -0000       1.74
+++ philosophy/free-doc.fr.html 28 Dec 2019 13:31:41 -0000      1.75
@@ -39,10 +39,11 @@
 d'introduction, mais que ceux-ci n'étaient pas libres.</p>
 
 <p>
-Mais pourquoi cela ? Les auteurs de ces bons manuels les ont écrits pour
-O'Reilly Associates, qui les publie sous des termes restrictifs (pas de
-copie, pas de modification, les sources ne sont pas disponibles). Cela les
-exclut de la communauté du logiciel libre.</p>
+Mais pourquoi cela ? Les auteurs de ces bons manuels les avaient écrits pour
+O'Reilly Associates, qui les avaient publiés sous des termes restrictifs
+(pas de copie, pas de modification, sources non disponibles), ce qui leur
+avait ôté la liberté et donc les avait exclus de la communauté du logiciel
+libre.</p>
 
 <p>
 Ce n'était pas la première fois que ce genre de choses se produisait, et
@@ -225,7 +226,7 @@
      There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005,
-2006, 2007, 2009, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2006, 2007, 2009, 2015, 2016, 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>Cette page peut être utilisée suivant les conditions de la licence <a
 rel="license"
@@ -243,7 +244,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Dernière mise à jour :
 
-$Date: 2018/09/06 08:58:26 $
+$Date: 2019/12/28 13:31:41 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: philosophy/po/free-doc.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-doc.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -b -r1.39 -r1.40
--- philosophy/po/free-doc.fr-en.html   18 Nov 2016 07:32:55 -0000      1.39
+++ philosophy/po/free-doc.fr-en.html   28 Dec 2019 13:31:41 -0000      1.40
@@ -29,14 +29,15 @@
 Once upon a time, many years ago, I thought I would learn Perl.  I got
 a copy of a free manual, but I found it hard to read.  When I asked
 Perl users about alternatives, they told me that there were better
-introductory manuals&mdash;but those were not free.</p>
+introductory manuals&mdash;but those were not free (not
+freedom-respecting).</p>
 
 <p>
 Why was this?  The authors of the good manuals had written them for
 O'Reilly Associates, which published them with restrictive
 terms&mdash;no copying, no modification, source files not
-available&mdash;which exclude them from the free software
-community.</p>
+available&mdash;which made them nonfree, thus excluded them from the
+Free World.</p>
 
 <p>
 That wasn't the first time this sort of thing has happened, and (to
@@ -195,7 +196,7 @@
      Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
 
 <p>Copyright &copy; 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004,
-2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2015, 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+2005, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2015, 2016, 2019 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
 
 <p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
 href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -205,7 +206,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/11/18 07:32:55 $
+$Date: 2019/12/28 13:31:41 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>