[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point.... |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Mar 2019 22:30:07 -0500 (EST) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 19/03/01 22:30:06
Modified files:
philosophy/po : open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html
open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
open-source-misses-the-point.pot
open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po
open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.24&r2=1.25
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.73&r2=1.74
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.49&r2=1.50
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.102&r2=1.103
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.102&r2=1.103
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.58&r2=1.59
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.102&r2=1.103
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.15&r2=1.16
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.34&r2=1.35
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.76&r2=1.77
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.72&r2=1.73
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.6&r2=1.7
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.16&r2=1.17
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.57&r2=1.58
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.46&r2=1.47
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.73&r2=1.74
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot?cvsroot=www&r1=1.45&r2=1.46
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.39&r2=1.40
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.98&r2=1.99
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.73&r2=1.74
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.3&r2=1.4
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.43&r2=1.44
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.53&r2=1.54
Patches:
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.24
retrieving revision 1.25
diff -u -b -r1.24 -r1.25
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 20 Feb 2019 15:30:44 -0000
1.24
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar-diff.html 2 Mar 2019 03:30:03 -0000
1.25
@@ -86,21 +86,24 @@
with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such as
making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters
of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same
-association.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>association.</p></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>association. Most discussion of “open
source” pays no
+attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's
+a <a
href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html">
+typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do
+nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible
+among the many that don't.</p></em></ins></span>
-<p>The two terms
+<p>The two <span
class="removed"><del><strong>terms</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>now</em></ins></span>
describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for
-views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a
-development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the
+views based on fundamentally different values. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Open source is a
+development methodology; free software is a social
movement.</strong></del></span> For the
free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast,
the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how to make
software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
-problem at hand. <span class="removed"><del><strong>For</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>Most discussion of “open source”
pays no
-attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's
-a <a
href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html">
-typical example</a>.</p>
+problem at <span class="removed"><del><strong>hand. For</strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>hand.</p>
<p>For</em></ins></span> the free software movement, however, nonfree
software is a
social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free
@@ -503,7 +506,7 @@
<span class="inserted"><ins><em><p
class="unprintable">Updated:</em></ins></span>
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/02/20 15:30:44 $
+$Date: 2019/03/02 03:30:03 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -b -r1.73 -r1.74
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:44 -0000 1.73
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ar.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.74
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-09-27 17:26+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafik E. Younan <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Arabic <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -132,6 +132,19 @@
"بعد Ø°Ù٠بآراء ÙÙسÙÙØ© تختÙ٠تÙ
اÙ
ا ع٠آراء
ØرÙØ© اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -143,7 +156,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"بعض Ù
ؤÙد٠اÙÙ
صادر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ© اعتبرÙÙا ”ØÙ
ÙØ© تسÙÙÙ ÙÙبرÙ
جÙات "
"اÙØرة“Ø ÙØ£ÙÙا سÙ٠تجذب رجا٠اÙأعÙ
ا٠عÙ
طرÙ٠اÙترÙÙز عÙ٠اÙÙ
زاÙا "
@@ -184,17 +202,13 @@
#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"ÙÙا اÙÙ
صطÙØÙÙ ÙصÙا٠تÙرÙبا ÙÙس Ùئة اÙبرÙ
جÙات. ÙÙÙÙÙ
ا ÙستÙدا٠إÙÙ ÙÙÙ
Ù
ختÙÙØ© "
"تÙ
اÙ
ا. تشÙ٠اÙÙ
صادر اÙÙ
ÙتÙØØ© استراتÙجÙØ©
تطÙÙØ±Ø Ø¨ÙÙÙ
ا تÙ
ث٠اÙبرÙ
جÙات اÙØرة "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po,v
retrieving revision 1.49
retrieving revision 1.50
diff -u -b -r1.49 -r1.50
--- open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:44 -0000 1.49
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.bg.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.50
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2009-10-28 14:55+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Yavor Doganov <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Bulgarian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -146,6 +146,19 @@
"ÑоÑÑÑеÑ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -157,7 +170,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑкои Ð¾Ñ Ð¿ÑивÑÑжениÑиÑе на оÑвоÑÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ ÐºÐ¾Ð´
ÑмÑÑаÑ
а ÑеÑмина за âмаÑкеÑингова "
"ÐºÐ°Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð° Ñвободен ÑоÑÑÑеÑâ, коÑÑо да
пÑивлиÑа Ñ
оÑа Ñ Ð¿Ð¾Ð·Ð¸Ñии в бизнеÑа "
@@ -184,17 +202,13 @@
#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"ÐоÑÑи вÑеки ÑоÑÑÑÐµÑ Ñ Ð¾ÑвоÑен код е
Ñвободен ÑоÑÑÑеÑ. ÐвеÑе понÑÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¾Ð¿Ð¸ÑÐ²Ð°Ñ "
"поÑÑи една и ÑÑÑа каÑегоÑÐ¸Ñ ÑоÑÑÑеÑ, но Ñе
ÑÑоÑÑ Ð·Ð°Ð´ вÑзгледи, базиÑани на "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.de.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.de.po,v
retrieving revision 1.102
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -b -r1.102 -r1.103
--- open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000 1.102
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.de.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.103
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: address@hidden"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-08-08 22:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Jоегg Kоhпе <joeko (AT) online [PUNKT] de>\n"
"Language-Team: German <www-de <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -142,6 +142,36 @@
"Bewegung gänzlich unterschieden."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -153,7 +183,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Einige der Open-Source-Befürworter betrachteten sie als <em>âMarketing-"
"Kampagne für freie Softwareâ</em>, welche an Geschäftsleute appellieren "
@@ -168,18 +203,36 @@
"hinzugekommenen Open-Source-Anhänger machen die gleiche Zuordnung."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-For the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social
+# | problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
+#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
+#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Die beiden Begriffe beschreiben fast die gleiche Softwarekategorie, jedoch "
"stehen sie für Ansichten, die auf grundsätzlich verschiedenen Werten "
@@ -189,11 +242,10 @@
"Freiheit der Nutzer. Im Gegensatz dazu betrachtet die Open-Source-"
"Philosophie Angelegenheiten in Bezug auf wie man Software âbesserâ "
"macht ‑ jedoch nur im praktischen Sinne. Es besagt, unfreie "
-"Software sei eine schlechtere Lösung für die konkrete Aufgabenstellung. In "
-"den meisten Diskussionen über âOpen Sourceâ geht es nicht um Richtig und
"
-"Falsch, nur um Popularität und Erfolg. Diese <a href=\"http://www."
-"linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
-"Trends-78937.html\">Analyse</a> nennt ein typisches Beispiel."
+"Software sei eine schlechtere Lösung für die konkrete Aufgabenstellung.
Für "
+"die Freie-Software-Bewegung ist unfreie Software jedoch ein soziales Problem "
+"und die Lösung, sie nicht mehr zu benutzen und der Umstieg auf Freie "
+"Software."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
@@ -1050,6 +1102,34 @@
msgid "Updated:"
msgstr "Letzte Ãnderung:"
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#~ "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#~ "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#~ "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#~ "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#~ "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#~ "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#~ "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#~ "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#~ "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#~ "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#~ "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#~ msgstr ""
+#~ "Die beiden Begriffe beschreiben fast die gleiche Softwarekategorie, "
+#~ "jedoch stehen sie für Ansichten, die auf grundsätzlich verschiedenen "
+#~ "Werten beruhen. Open Source ist eine Entwicklungsmethodik; Freie Software "
+#~ "ist eine soziale Bewegung. Für die Freie-Software-Bewegung bedeutet "
+#~ "<em>freie</em> Software eine ethisch unbedingt erforderliche, wesentliche "
+#~ "Achtung vor der Freiheit der Nutzer. Im Gegensatz dazu betrachtet die "
+#~ "Open-Source-Philosophie Angelegenheiten in Bezug auf wie man Software "
+#~ "âbesserâ macht ‑ jedoch nur im praktischen Sinne. Es "
+#~ "besagt, unfreie Software sei eine schlechtere Lösung für die konkrete "
+#~ "Aufgabenstellung. In den meisten Diskussionen über âOpen Sourceâ geht
es "
+#~ "nicht um Richtig und Falsch, nur um Popularität und Erfolg. Diese <a
href="
+#~ "\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+#~ "Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">Analyse</a> nennt ein typisches Beispiel."
+
#~ msgid "by <strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
#~ msgstr "von <strong>Richard Stallman</strong>"
@@ -1326,31 +1406,6 @@
#~ "eintritt, sollte keiner dieser neutralen Begriffen verwendet werden."
#~ msgid ""
-#~ "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
-#~ "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
-#~ "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
-#~ "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
-#~ "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
-#~ "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
-#~ "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
-#~ "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. For "
-#~ "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
-#~ "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
-#~ msgstr ""
-#~ "Die beiden Begriffe beschreiben fast die gleiche Softwarekategorie, "
-#~ "jedoch stehen sie für Ansichten, die auf grundsätzlich verschiedenen "
-#~ "Werten beruhen. Open Source ist eine Entwicklungsmethodik; Freie Software "
-#~ "ist eine soziale Bewegung. Für die Freie-Software-Bewegung bedeutet "
-#~ "<em>freie</em> Software eine ethisch unbedingt erforderliche, wesentliche "
-#~ "Achtung vor der Freiheit der Nutzer. Im Gegensatz dazu betrachtet die "
-#~ "Open-Source-Philosophie Angelegenheiten in Bezug auf wie man Software "
-#~ "âbesserâ macht ‑ jedoch nur im praktischen Sinne. Es "
-#~ "besagt, unfreie Software sei eine schlechtere Lösung für die konkrete "
-#~ "Aufgabenstellung. Für die Freie-Software-Bewegung ist unfreie Software "
-#~ "jedoch ein soziales Problem und die Lösung, sie nicht mehr zu benutzen "
-#~ "und der Umstieg auf Freie Software."
-
-#~ msgid ""
#~ "“Free software.” “Open source.” If it's the same "
#~ "software (or nearly so), does it matter which name you use? Yes, because "
#~ "different words convey different ideas. While a free program by any "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.el.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.el.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000 1.16
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.el.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.17
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -245,7 +245,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"ÎάÏοιοι αÏÏ ÏοÏ
Ï Ï
ÏοÏÏηÏικÏÎÏ ÏοÏ
ανοιÏÏÎ¿Ï ÎºÏδικα Ïο θεÏÏηÏαν Ïαν μία “"
"εμÏοÏική δÏαÏÏηÏιοÏοίηÏη για Ïο ελεÏθεÏο
λογιÏμικϔ Ïο οÏοίο θα άÏεÏε "
@@ -291,17 +296,13 @@
#| "however, nonfree software is a social problem, and moving to free "
#| "software is the solution."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"ΣÏεδÏν Ïλο Ïο λογιÏÎ¼Î¹ÎºÏ Î±Î½Î¿Î¹ÏÏÎ¿Ï ÎºÏδικα
είναι ελεÏθεÏο λογιÏμικÏ. Îι δÏο "
"ÏÏοι ÏεÏιγÏάÏοÏ
ν ÏÏεδÏν Ïην ίδια
καÏηγοÏία λογιÏμικοÏ. Îλλά ανÏιÏÏοÏÏÏεÏοÏ
ν "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.es.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.es.po,v
retrieving revision 1.102
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -b -r1.102 -r1.103
--- open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 23 Feb 2019 10:26:15 -0000 1.102
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.es.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.103
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Javier Fdez. Retenaga <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Spanish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n!=1);\n"
"X-Generator: Poedit 1.8.11\n"
@@ -157,6 +158,36 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -168,7 +199,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Algunos de los defensores del «código abierto» lo consideraron una
«campaña "
"de marketing para el software libre», con el objetivo de atraer a los "
@@ -186,18 +222,40 @@
# type: Content of: <p>
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Ambas expresiones describen casi la misma categorÃa de software, pero "
"representan puntos de vista basados en valores fundamentalmente diferentes. "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po,v
retrieving revision 1.58
retrieving revision 1.59
diff -u -b -r1.58 -r1.59
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000 1.58
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fa.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.59
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2011-01-16 23:22+0330\n"
"Last-Translator: Mahyar Moghimi <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Persian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -142,6 +142,19 @@
"دÛدگا٠ÙÙسÙÛ٠کاÙ
Ùا Ù
تÙاÙت از جÙبش ÙرÙ
âاÙزار آزاد Ù¾Ûدا کرد."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -153,7 +166,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"ØªØ¹Ø¯Ø§Ø¯Û Ø§Ø² ØاÙ
Ûا٠«Ù
تÙâباز» آ٠را ÙÙØ¹Û Â«Ú©Ù
Ù¾Û٠بازارÛØ§Ø¨Û Ø¨Ø±Ø§Û ÙرÙ
âاÙزار آزاد» "
"Ù
Ø·Ø±Ø Ú©Ø±Ø¯Ùد ک٠با پررÙÚ¯ گرد٠سÙدâÙØ§Û Ø¹Ù
ÙÛ
ÙرÙ
âاÙزار Ù
ÛâØ®ÙاÙد از Ù
دÛرا٠اجراÛÛ "
@@ -180,17 +198,13 @@
#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"تÙرÛبا تÙ
اÙ
ÙرÙ
âاÙزارÙØ§Û Ù
تÙâباز ÛÚ© ÙرÙ
âاÙزار آزاد ÙÛز Ù
ØسÙب Ù
ÛâØ´ÙÙØ¯Ø Ùر د٠"
"عبارت تÙرÛبا ÛÚ© دست٠از ÙرÙ
âاÙزارÙا را
تÙصÛÙ Ù
ÛâÚ©ÙÙØ¯Ø ÙÙÛ Ù¾Ø§ÛÙâÛ Ø¢ÙâÙا بر "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.102
retrieving revision 1.103
diff -u -b -r1.102 -r1.103
--- open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 21 Feb 2019 11:13:29 -0000 1.102
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.fr.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.103
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-02-21 12:12+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: French <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: \n"
"X-Generator: Gtranslator 2.91.5\n"
@@ -150,6 +151,36 @@
"complètement différents de ceux du mouvement du logiciel libre."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -161,7 +192,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Certains des partisans de l'open source considéraient cela comme « une "
"campagne marketing pour le logiciel libre » qui séduirait les cadres des "
@@ -177,18 +213,40 @@
"cette association."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Les deux expressions décrivent à peu près la même catégorie de logiciel,
"
"mais elles représentent des points de vue basés sur des valeurs "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.15
retrieving revision 1.16
diff -u -b -r1.15 -r1.16
--- open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000
1.15
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.hr-diff.html 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.16
@@ -86,21 +86,27 @@
with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such as
making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters
of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same
-association.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>association.</p></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>association. Most discussion of “open
source” pays no
+attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's
+a <a
href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html">
+typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do
+nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible
+among the many that don't.</p></em></ins></span>
-<p>The two terms
+<p>The two <span
class="removed"><del><strong>terms</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>now</em></ins></span>
describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for
-views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a
-development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the
+views based on fundamentally different values. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Open source is a
+development methodology; free software is a social
movement.</strong></del></span> For the
free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast,
the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how to make
software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
-problem at hand. Most discussion of “open source” pays no
+problem at <span class="removed"><del><strong>hand. Most discussion of
“open source” pays no
attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's
a <a
href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html">
-typical example</a>.</p>
+typical example</a>.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>hand.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>For the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a
social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free
@@ -133,8 +139,8 @@
<p>Second, and more <span
class="removed"><del><strong>important,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>important in practice,</em></ins></span> many
products containing
computers
<span class="removed"><del><strong>(including many Android devices) come
with</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>check signatures on
their</em></ins></span> executable programs <span
class="removed"><del><strong>that
-correspond to free software source code, but the devices do not allow
-the user</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>install
modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
+correspond</strong></del></span> to <span class="removed"><del><strong>free
software source code, but the devices do not allow
+the user to install modified versions of those</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>block users
from installing different</em></ins></span> executables; only one
<span class="removed"><del><strong>special</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>privileged</em></ins></span> company <span
class="removed"><del><strong>has</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>can
make executables that can run in</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>power to modify them.</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>device or can access its full
@@ -501,7 +507,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/02/20 15:30:45 $
+$Date: 2019/03/02 03:30:05 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.34
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -b -r1.34 -r1.35
--- open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000 1.34
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.hr.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.35
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2014-02-06 22:11+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Martina Bebek <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: GNU Croatian Translation Team <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -138,6 +138,36 @@
"filozofskim glediÅ¡tima bitno razliÄitim od onih pokreta slobodnog softvera.
"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -149,7 +179,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Neki od pobornika otvorenog izvornog koda smatrali su termin “"
"marketinÅ¡kom kampanjom za slobodan softver,” koja bi se obratila "
@@ -165,18 +200,40 @@
"asocijaciju. "
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Ta dva termina opisuju skoro istu kategoriju softvera, ali drže gledišta "
"osnovana na temeljno razliÄitim vrijednostima. Otvoreni izvorni kod je "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.it.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.it.po,v
retrieving revision 1.76
retrieving revision 1.77
diff -u -b -r1.76 -r1.77
--- open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000 1.76
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.it.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.77
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-07-30 17:23+0100\n"
"Last-Translator: Andrea Pescetti <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Italian\n"
@@ -143,6 +143,36 @@
"libero. "
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -154,7 +184,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Alcune delle persone che promuovono l'âopen sourceâ lo considerano come
una "
"âcampagna di marketing per il software liberoâ, che vorrebbe attrarre i "
@@ -171,18 +206,40 @@
"questo termine. "
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"I due termini descrivono all'incirca la stessa categoria di software. Ma si "
"basano su valori fondamentalmente diversi. L'open source è una metodologia "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po,v
retrieving revision 1.72
retrieving revision 1.73
diff -u -b -r1.72 -r1.73
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000 1.72
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ja.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.73
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-01-17 16:07+0900\n"
"Last-Translator: NIIBE Yutaka <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Japanese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -133,6 +133,19 @@
"ãªãã¾ããã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -144,7 +157,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"ãªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã®æ¯æè
ã®ä½äººãã¯ããã®ç¨èªããèªç±ã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®ãã¼ã±ãã£ã³"
"ã°ã»ãã£ã³ãã¼ã³ãã¨èãã¦ãã¾ããããã¸ãã¹çµå¶è
ã«ãã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®å®éçãª"
@@ -158,18 +176,28 @@
"ã½ã¼ã¹æ¯æè
ã®ã»ã¨ãã©ã¯ãããããéåã«åå
ããåãé¢é£ä»ããããã®ã§ãã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"äºã¤ã®ç¨èªã¯ã»ã¨ãã©åãã½ããã¦ã§ã¢ã®åé¡ãè¿°ã¹ã¾ãããåºæ¬çã«ç°ãªã£ã価å¤"
"ã«ãã¨ã¥ãè¦è§£ã«ç«èãã¦ãã¾ãããªã¼ãã³ã½ã¼ã¹ã¯éçºã®æ¹æ³è«ã§ãèªç±ã½ãã"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.6
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -b -r1.6 -r1.7
--- open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html 20 Feb 2019 15:30:45 -0000
1.6
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.lt-diff.html 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.7
@@ -86,21 +86,27 @@
with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, such as
making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters
of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same
-association.</p>
+<span class="removed"><del><strong>association.</p></strong></del></span>
+<span class="inserted"><ins><em>association. Most discussion of “open
source” pays no
+attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's
+a <a
href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html">
+typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do
+nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible
+among the many that don't.</p></em></ins></span>
-<p>The two terms
+<p>The two <span
class="removed"><del><strong>terms</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>now</em></ins></span>
describe almost the same category of software, but they stand for
-views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a
-development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the
+views based on fundamentally different values. <span
class="removed"><del><strong>Open source is a
+development methodology; free software is a social
movement.</strong></del></span> For the
free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast,
the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how to make
software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
-problem at hand. Most discussion of “open source” pays no
+problem at <span class="removed"><del><strong>hand. Most discussion of
“open source” pays no
attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's
a <a
href="http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html">
-typical example</a>.</p>
+typical example</a>.</p></strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>hand.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>For the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a
social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free
@@ -490,7 +496,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2019/02/20 15:30:45 $
+$Date: 2019/03/02 03:30:05 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po,v
retrieving revision 1.16
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -u -b -r1.16 -r1.17
--- open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.16
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.lt.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.17
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-01-15 02:06+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Donatas Klimašauskas <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Lithuanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -141,6 +141,19 @@
"judÄjimas."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -152,7 +165,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Kai kurie atviro Å¡altinio palaikytojai manÄ, kad tas terminas yra „"
"marketingo kampanija už laisvÄ
programinÄ Ä¯rangÄ
“, o tai patiktų "
@@ -168,18 +186,28 @@
"asociacijas."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Å ie du terminai apibÅ«dina beveik tÄ
paÄiÄ
programinÄs įrangos
kategorijÄ
, "
"bet jie atstovauja požiūrius, paremtus fundamentaliai skirtingomis "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po,v
retrieving revision 1.57
retrieving revision 1.58
diff -u -b -r1.57 -r1.58
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.57
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ml.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.58
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html 1\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-07-13 08:18+0530\n"
"Last-Translator: Shyam Karanattu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Swathanthra Malayalam Computing <address@hidden"
@@ -137,6 +137,36 @@
"മറàµà´±àµà´¾à´°àµ à´à´¶à´¯à´¤àµà´¤àµ
പിനàµâതാà´àµà´àµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤à´¾à´¯à´¿."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -148,7 +178,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"“à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ” -à´¨àµà´±àµ
à´à´¿à´² à´ªàµà´°à´µà´°àµâà´¤àµà´¤à´à´°àµâ à´à´¦àµà´¯à´ à´
തിനൠ“à´¸àµà´µà´¤à´¨àµà´¤àµà´° "
"à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿à´¨àµàµ വാണിà´àµà´¯
à´°à´à´à´¤àµà´¤àµ വിപണന à´à´ªà´¾à´§à´¿” à´à´¯à´¾à´£àµàµ
à´à´£àµà´à´¤àµàµ. à´ªàµà´¾à´¤àµà´µàµ സാമàµà´¹à´¿à´ "
@@ -162,21 +197,17 @@
"à´
à´¤àµà´àµà´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ തനàµà´¨àµ
“à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ” à´
à´àµà´à´¿à´¨àµ
à´à´°àµ à´à´¶à´¯à´¤àµà´¤àµ
à´ªàµà´°à´¤à´¿à´¨à´¿à´§àµà´à´°à´¿à´àµà´àµ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-# | The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they
-# | stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a
-# | development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free
-# | software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, [-because only
-# | free software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the users' freedom. By
-# | contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues in terms of how
-# | to make software “better”—in a practical sense only. It
-# | says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical
-# | problem at hand. [-For the free software movement, however, nonfree
-# | software is a social problem, and the solution is-] {+Most discussion of
-# | “open source” pays no attention+} to [-stop using it-]
-# | {+right+} and [-move-] {+wrong, only+} to [-free software.-] {+popularity
-# | and success; here's a <a
-# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
-# | typical example</a>.+}
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | [-because only free software respects-] {+essential respect for+} the
+# | users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers
+# | issues in terms of how to make software “better”—in a
+# | practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior
+# | solution to the practical problem at hand. [-For the free software
+# | movement, however, nonfree software is a social problem, and the solution
+# | is to stop using it and move to free software.-]
#, fuzzy
#| msgid ""
#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
@@ -191,17 +222,13 @@
#| "social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free "
#| "software."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"à´°à´£àµà´àµàµ പദà´àµà´à´³àµà´ à´à´¤à´¾à´£àµà´àµàµ
à´à´°àµ à´à´£à´¤àµà´¤à´¿à´²àµà´³àµà´³
à´¸àµà´«àµà´±àµà´±àµâà´µàµà´¯à´±à´¿à´¨àµ
à´àµà´±à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´£àµàµ പറയàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµà´.
à´ªà´àµà´·àµ "
"à´
à´à´¿à´¸àµà´¥à´¾à´¨à´ªà´°à´®à´¾à´¯à´¿
à´µàµà´¯à´¤àµà´¯à´¸àµà´¤à´®à´¾à´¯ à´à´¶à´àµà´à´³àµ
à´àµà´±à´¿à´àµà´à´¾à´£àµàµ à´
വരàµâ
പറയàµà´¨àµà´¨à´¤àµàµ. à´à´ªàµà´ªà´£àµâ à´¸àµà´´àµà´¸àµ
à´à´°àµ നിരàµâà´®àµà´®à´¾à´£ "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.46
retrieving revision 1.47
diff -u -b -r1.46 -r1.47
--- open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.46
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.nl.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.47
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Justin van Steijn <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Dutch\n"
@@ -137,6 +137,36 @@
"filosofische overtuigingen die niets met vrije software van doen hadden."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -148,7 +178,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Bepaalde voorstanders van “open bron” beschouwden het als een "
"“marketingcampagne voor vrije software” die zakelijke gebruikers "
@@ -163,18 +198,40 @@
"hebben dus de huidige mores overgenomen."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"De benamingen duiden bijna dezelfde categorie. Ze zijn echter gebaseerd op "
"verschillende ideeën. Open bron is een manier van ontwikkelen; vrije "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -b -r1.73 -r1.74
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.73
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.74
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: Why Open Source misses the point of Free Software\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-05-01 10:34-0600\n"
"Last-Translator: Jan Owoc <jsowoc AT gmail.com>\n"
"Language-Team: Polish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -145,6 +145,36 @@
"oprogramowania."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -156,7 +186,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"CzeÅÄ osób wspierajÄ
cych Årodowisko otwartego oprogramowania rozważaÅo
"
"użycie tego pojÄcia jako „marketingowej kampanii na rzecz
wolnego "
@@ -174,18 +209,40 @@
"praktycznych wartoÅciach."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Te dwa okreÅlenia opisujÄ
niemalże te same kategorie oprogramowania, "
"lecz opierajÄ
siÄ na zasadniczo różnych wartoÅciach. Otwarte "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pot
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pot,v
retrieving revision 1.45
retrieving revision 1.46
diff -u -b -r1.45 -r1.46
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pot 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.45
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pot 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.46
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: YEAR-MO-DA HO:MI+ZONE\n"
"Last-Translator: FULL NAME <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: LANGUAGE <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -106,23 +106,23 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a "
+"href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
"
+"typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays "
+"say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the "
+"many that don't."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software "
-"“better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
-"software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
-"discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
-"wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a "
-"href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
"
-"typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -b -r1.39 -r1.40
--- open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 20 Feb 2019 23:02:45 -0000
1.39
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.pt-br.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000
1.40
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-02-20 19:40-0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Rafael Fontenelle <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Brazilian Portuguese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"Plural-Forms: nplurals=2; plural=(n > 1);\n"
"X-Generator: Virtaal 1.0.0-beta1\n"
@@ -147,6 +148,19 @@
"software livre."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -158,7 +172,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Alguns dos partidários do código aberto consideram o termo uma âcampanha
de "
"marketing pelo software livreâ, que apela aos empresários ao salientar os "
@@ -173,18 +192,28 @@
"então, e fazem a mesma associação."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Os dois termos descrevem quase a mesma categoria de software, porém eles "
"apoiam visões baseadas em valores fundamentalmente diferentes. O código "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.41
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ro.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.42
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-08-27 20:00+0300\n"
"Last-Translator: CÄtÄlin Frâncu <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Romanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -137,6 +137,19 @@
"miÈcÄrii pentru software liber."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -148,7 +161,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Unii dintre susÈinÄtorii sursei deschise au considerat termenul âo
campanie "
"de marketing pentru softare-ul liberâ, care ar atrage puterile executive
din "
@@ -192,17 +210,13 @@
#| "social problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free "
#| "software."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Cei doi termeni descriu aproape aceeaÈi categorie de software, dar "
"reprezintÄ puncte de vedere bazate pe valori fundamental diferite. Sursa "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.98
retrieving revision 1.99
diff -u -b -r1.98 -r1.99
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 20 Feb 2019 16:33:02 -0000 1.98
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ru.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.99
@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-02-20 17:17+0000\n"
"Last-Translator: Ineiev <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Russian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
# type: Content of: <title>
#. type: Content of: <title>
@@ -155,6 +156,36 @@
"оÑлиÑнÑми Ð¾Ñ Ð²Ð·Ð³Ð»Ñдов Ð´Ð²Ð¸Ð¶ÐµÐ½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð°
Ñвободное пÑогÑаммное обеÑпеÑение."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+# | Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a
+# | “marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to
+# | business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits,
+# | while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to
+# | hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's
+# | ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for
+# | open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term
+# | “open source” quickly became associated with ideas and
+# | arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having
+# | powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have
+# | come to it since then, and they make the same association. {+Most
+# | discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and
+# | wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>. A minority of supporters of open source do nowadays
+# | say freedom is part of the issue, but they are not very visible among the
+# | many that don't.+}
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -166,7 +197,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Ðдни ÑÑоÑонники оÑкÑÑÑого иÑÑ
одного
ÑекÑÑа ÑаÑÑмаÑÑивали ÑÑÐ¾Ñ ÑеÑмин как "
"“ÑекламнÑÑ ÐºÐ°Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½Ð¸Ñ Ð·Ð° Ñвободное
пÑогÑаммное обеÑпеÑение”, "
@@ -183,18 +219,40 @@
"иÑÑ
одного ÑекÑÑа, и они аÑÑоÑииÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ñ
Ñем же."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+# | The two [-terms-] {+now+} describe almost the same category of software,
+# | but they stand for views based on fundamentally different values. [-Open
+# | source is a development methodology; free software is a social movement.-]
+# | For the free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative,
+# | essential respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of
+# | open source considers issues in terms of how to make software
+# | “better”—in a practical sense only. It says that
+# | nonfree software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand.
+# | [-Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right
+# | and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a
+# |
href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\">
+# | typical example</a>.-]
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"ÐÑи два ÑеÑмина опиÑÑваÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾ÑÑи Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ð¸ ÑÑ
же \n"
"каÑегоÑÐ¸Ñ Ð¿ÑогÑамм, но они ÑооÑвеÑÑÑвÑÑÑ
взглÑдам, оÑнованнÑм на "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po,v
retrieving revision 1.73
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -b -r1.73 -r1.74
--- open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.73
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.sq.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:05 -0000 1.74
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2017-12-25 00:07+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Besnik Bleta <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Albanian <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -135,6 +135,19 @@
"të lëvizjes së software-it të lirë."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -146,7 +159,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Disa nga përkrahësit e burimit të hapur e konsideronin termin si një
“"
"fushatë marketingu për software-in e lirë,” çka do të joshte
drejtues "
@@ -162,18 +180,28 @@
"rreshtuar pas tij, dhe bëjnë të njëjtin përshoqërim."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Dy termat përshkruajnë pothuajse të njëjtën kategori software-i, por
mbrojnë "
"pikëpamje të bazuara thelbësisht mbi vlera të ndryshme. Burimi i hapur "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po,v
retrieving revision 1.3
retrieving revision 1.4
diff -u -b -r1.3 -r1.4
--- open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.3
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.ta.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000 1.4
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: \n"
"Last-Translator: Thérèse Godefroy <godef.th AT free.fr>\n"
"Language-Team: web-translators <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -237,7 +237,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"திறநà¯à®¤ à®®à¯à®² à®®à¯à®©à¯à®ªà¯à®°à¯à®à¯à®à®³à¯
பிரபலப௠பà®à¯à®¤à¯à®¤à®¿à®¯à¯à®°à¯à®à®³à®¿à®²à¯
à®à®¿à®²à®°à¯ à®à®¤à®©à¯à®³à¯ à®
à®à®à¯à®à®¿à®¯à®¿à®°à¯à®à¯à®à¯à®®à¯ à®à®¾à®¤à® "
"பாத஠à®à®¿à®¨à¯à®¤à®©à¯à®à®³à¯à®à¯à®à¯à®à¯
à®à¯à®µà®¿à®®à®à¯à®à¯à®à®¾à®¤à¯ வரà¯à®¤à¯à®¤à® à®
லà¯à®µà®²à®°à¯à®à®³à¯à®à¯à®à¯, நà®à¯à®®à¯à®±à¯
à®à®²à®¾à®ªà®à¯à®à®³à¯ "
@@ -280,17 +285,13 @@
#| "however, nonfree software is a social problem, and moving to free "
#| "software is the solution."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"à®à®±à®¤à¯à®¤à®¾à®´ à®
னà¯à®¤à¯à®¤à¯ திறநà¯à®¤ à®®à¯à®²
à®®à¯à®©à¯à®ªà¯à®°à¯à®à¯à®à®³à¯à®®à¯ à®à®à¯à®à®±à¯à®±
à®®à¯à®©à¯à®ªà¯à®°à¯à®³à¯. à®à®°à®£à¯à®à¯ பதà®à¯à®à®³à¯à®®à¯
à®à®¿à®à¯à®à®¤à¯ "
"தà®à¯à® à®à®°à¯ வà®à¯à®¯à®¾à®©
à®®à¯à®©à¯à®ªà¯à®°à¯à®à¯à®à®³à¯à®¯à¯
à®à¯à®±à®¿à®à¯à®à®¿à®©à¯à®±à®©. à®à®©à®¾à®²à¯ à®
à®à®¿à®ªà¯à®ªà®à¯à®¯à®¿à®²à¯ வà¯à®±à¯à®ªà®à¯à®
தாரà¯à®®à¯à® "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po,v
retrieving revision 1.43
retrieving revision 1.44
diff -u -b -r1.43 -r1.44
--- open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.43
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.tr.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000 1.44
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2010-05-16 16:54+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Tahir Emre Kalaycı <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Turkish <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -145,6 +145,19 @@
"görüÅlerden oldukça farklı görüÅlerle iliÅkilendirildi."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -156,7 +169,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"Açık kaynak destekçilerinin bir kısmı terimi âözgür yazılım için
pazarlama "
"kampanyasıâ olarak düÅündü, bu Åekilde Åirket yöneticilerine,
duymak "
@@ -184,17 +202,13 @@
#| "the free software movement, however, nonfree software is a social "
#| "problem, and the solution is to stop using it and move to free software."
msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Neredeyse tüm açık kaynak yazılımlar özgür yazılımdır. İki terim
neredeyse "
"yazılımın aynı kategorisini tanımlamaktadır, ancak temel olarak farklı
"
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 20 Feb 2019 15:30:46 -0000 1.42
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.uk.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000 1.43
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: open-source-misses-the-point.html\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2016-08-04 07:30+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Andriy Bandura <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Ukrainian <>\n"
@@ -137,6 +137,19 @@
"забезпеÑеннÑ."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -148,7 +161,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"ÐÐ´Ð½Ñ Ð¿ÑиÑ
илÑники вÑдкÑиÑого виÑ
Ñдного
ÑекÑÑÑ ÑозглÑдали Ñей ÑеÑмÑн Ñк “"
"ÑÐµÐºÐ»Ð°Ð¼Ð½Ñ ÐºÐ°Ð¼Ð¿Ð°Ð½ÑÑ Ð·Ð° вÑлÑне пÑогÑамне
забезпеÑеннє, Ñка пÑивеÑнÑла б "
@@ -164,18 +182,28 @@
"виÑ
Ñдного кодÑ, Ñ Ð²Ð¾Ð½Ð¸ аÑоÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ Ð· Ñим
же."
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"Ð¦Ñ Ð´Ð²Ð° ÑеÑмÑни опиÑÑÑÑÑ Ð¼Ð°Ð¹Ð¶Ðµ Ð¾Ð´Ð½Ñ Ñ ÑÑ Ð¶
каÑегоÑÑÑ Ð¿ÑогÑам, але вони "
"вÑдповÑдаÑÑÑ Ð¿Ð¾Ð³Ð»Ñдам, заÑнованим на
пÑинÑипово ÑÑзниÑ
ÑÑнноÑÑÑÑ
. ÐÑдкÑиÑий "
Index: open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po,v
retrieving revision 1.53
retrieving revision 1.54
diff -u -b -r1.53 -r1.54
--- open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 23 Feb 2019 10:31:34 -0000
1.53
+++ open-source-misses-the-point.zh-cn.po 2 Mar 2019 03:30:06 -0000
1.54
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: 1.0\n"
-"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-02-20 15:24+0000\n"
+"POT-Creation-Date: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2019-02-23 17:23+0800\n"
"Last-Translator: Wensheng Xie <address@hidden>\n"
"Language-Team: Chinese <address@hidden>\n"
@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
+"X-Outdated-Since: 2019-03-02 03:26+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -124,6 +125,19 @@
"è¿ã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “"
+#| "marketing campaign for free software,” which would appeal to "
+#| "business executives by highlighting the software's practical benefits, "
+#| "while not raising issues of right and wrong that they might not like to "
+#| "hear. Other supporters flatly rejected the free software movement's "
+#| "ethical and social values. Whichever their views, when campaigning for "
+#| "open source, they neither cited nor advocated those values. The term "
+#| "“open source” quickly became associated with ideas and "
+#| "arguments based only on practical values, such as making or having "
+#| "powerful, reliable software. Most of the supporters of open source have "
+#| "come to it since then, and they make the same association."
msgid ""
"Some of the supporters of open source considered the term a “marketing "
"campaign for free software,” which would appeal to business executives "
@@ -135,7 +149,12 @@
"became associated with ideas and arguments based only on practical values, "
"such as making or having powerful, reliable software. Most of the "
"supporters of open source have come to it since then, and they make the same "
-"association."
+"association. Most discussion of “open source” pays no attention "
+"to right and wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href="
+"\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-"
+"Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>. A minority of supporters "
+"of open source do nowadays say freedom is part of the issue, but they are "
+"not very visible among the many that don't."
msgstr ""
"ä¸äºå¼æºçæ¯æè
ä¼è®¤ä¸ºï¼æè°å¼æºï¼æ
éæ¯ç¨æ¥“为èªç±è½¯ä»¶åå¸åºè¥é"
"”çãå
·ä½è¯´æ¥ï¼å°±æ¯åé£äºåç人士å±ç°èªç±è½¯ä»¶çå®é
好å¤ãåæ¶é¿å
è°åä»"
@@ -146,18 +165,28 @@
"å¾å¤å¼æºæ¯æè
ä»ä¸å¼å§å°±æè¿äºä»·å¼è§æ¨å´è³æï¼ä¹é¾æªå±å¤äººä¼æå¦æ¤èç³»äºã"
#. type: Content of: <div><p>
-msgid ""
-"The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
-"for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is a "
-"development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the free "
-"software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect "
-"for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source "
-"considers issues in terms of how to make software “better”—"
-"in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior "
-"solution to the practical problem at hand. Most discussion of “open "
-"source” pays no attention to right and wrong, only to popularity and "
-"success; here's a <a href=\"http://www.linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-"
-"Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+#, fuzzy
+#| msgid ""
+#| "The two terms describe almost the same category of software, but they "
+#| "stand for views based on fundamentally different values. Open source is "
+#| "a development methodology; free software is a social movement. For the "
+#| "free software movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential "
+#| "respect for the users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open "
+#| "source considers issues in terms of how to make software “"
+#| "better”—in a practical sense only. It says that nonfree "
+#| "software is an inferior solution to the practical problem at hand. Most "
+#| "discussion of “open source” pays no attention to right and "
+#| "wrong, only to popularity and success; here's a <a href=\"http://www."
+#| "linuxinsider.com/story/Open-Source-Is-Woven-Into-the-Latest-Hottest-"
+#| "Trends-78937.html\"> typical example</a>."
+msgid ""
+"The two now describe almost the same category of software, but they stand "
+"for views based on fundamentally different values. For the free software "
+"movement, free software is an ethical imperative, essential respect for the "
+"users' freedom. By contrast, the philosophy of open source considers issues "
+"in terms of how to make software “better”—in a practical "
+"sense only. It says that nonfree software is an inferior solution to the "
+"practical problem at hand."
msgstr ""
"å¼æºè½¯ä»¶åèªç±è½¯ä»¶è¿ä¸¤ä¸ªè¯å¨å¾å¤§ç¨åº¦ä¸æè¿°çæ¯åä¸ç±»è½¯ä»¶ï¼ä½æ¯å®ä»¬æåºäºçä»·"
"å¼è§å´æçæ¬è´¨ä¸çåºå«ãå¼æºæ¯æä¸å¥å¼åæ¹æ³ï¼èèªç±è½¯ä»¶åæ¯ä¸åºç¤¾ä¼è¿å¨ã对"
- www/philosophy/po open-source-misses-the-point....,
GNUN <=