[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff...
From: |
GNUN |
Subject: |
www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff... |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 03:33:29 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 18/08/16 03:33:29
Modified files:
licenses : gpl-faq.it.html
licenses/po : gpl-faq.it-diff.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5
Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- gpl-faq.it.html 31 May 2018 20:30:08 -0000 1.31
+++ gpl-faq.it.html 16 Aug 2018 07:33:28 -0000 1.32
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2018-06-17" --><!--#set
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.it.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
@@ -47,6 +52,7 @@
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.it.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.it.html" -->
<h2>Domande ricorrenti sulle licenze GNU</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.it.html" -->
@@ -3909,7 +3915,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ultimo aggiornamento:
-$Date: 2018/05/31 20:30:08 $
+$Date: 2018/08/16 07:33:28 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html 7 May 2018 21:59:00 -0000 1.4
+++ po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html 16 Aug 2018 07:33:29 -0000 1.5
@@ -193,11 +193,11 @@
“aggregate” and other kinds of “modified
versions”?</a></li>
- <li><a <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#AggregateContainers">When it comes to
determining
+ <li><a href="#AggregateContainers">When it comes to determining
whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
that the code is in one or more containers have any
effect?</a></li>
- <li><a</em></ins></span> href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the
FSF require that
+ <li><a href="#AssignCopyright">Why does the FSF require that
contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
too? If so, how?</a></li>
@@ -430,12 +430,12 @@
version of a GPL'ed program on a web site. Does the GPL say they
must release their modified sources?</a></li>
- <li><a <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a
modified
+ <li><a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a
modified
version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
sources?</a></li>
- <li><a</em></ins></span> href="#InternalDistribution">Is use
within one organization
+ <li><a href="#InternalDistribution">Is use within one
organization
or company “distribution”?</a></li>
<li><a href="#StolenCopy">If someone steals a CD containing a
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@
for more details.</p>
<p>You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along
-with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses>.</p>
+with this program; if not, see <span
class="removed"><del><strong><http://www.gnu.org/licenses>.</p></strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em><https://www.gnu.org/licenses>.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>Additional permission under GNU GPL version 3 section 7</p>
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@
for more details.</p>
<p>You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along
-with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses>.</p>
+with this program; if not, see <span
class="removed"><del><strong><http://www.gnu.org/licenses>.</p></strong></del></span>
<span
class="inserted"><ins><em><https://www.gnu.org/licenses>.</p></em></ins></span>
<p>Linking <var>[name of your program]</var> statically or
dynamically with
other modules is making a combined work based on <var>[name of your
@@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@
could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
program.</p></dd>
-<dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="AggregateContainers">When it
comes to determining
+<dt id="AggregateContainers">When it comes to determining
whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#AggregateContainers"
@@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@
href="#MereAggregation">single work or an
aggregate</a> is unchanged by the involvement of
containers.</p></dd>
-<dt</em></ins></span> id="AssignCopyright">Why does
+<dt id="AssignCopyright">Why does
the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
copyright to the FSF? If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should
I do this, too? If so, how?
@@ -2421,37 +2421,29 @@
The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without
ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special
case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
-modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.</p>
-
-<p>It</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>sources. The
situation</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>essential for
people</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>different when the
modified program
+modified sources. The situation is different when the modified program
is licensed under the terms of the <a
href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL">GNU Affero GPL</a>.</p>
-<p>Compare this</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>a situation where</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>freedom</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>web site contains or links</em></ins></span> to <span
class="removed"><del><strong>make modifications and
-use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications. However,
-putting</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed
to the user when they
+<p>Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
+separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
visit the web site (often written in <a
href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html">JavaScript</a>, but other
languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
-programs being distributed must be released to the user
under</em></ins></span> the
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>terms of the GPL.</p></dd>
+programs being distributed must be released to the user under the
+terms of the GPL.</p></dd>
<dt id="UnreleasedModsAGPL">A company is running a modified
- version of a</em></ins></span> program <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>licensed under the GNU Affero GPL
(AGPL)</em></ins></span> on a <span class="removed"><del><strong>server machine
for</strong></del></span>
- <span class="inserted"><ins><em>web site. Does</em></ins></span> the <span
class="removed"><del><strong>public to talk</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>AGPL say they must release their modified
+ version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+ web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
sources?
<span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"
>#UnreleasedModsAGPL</a>)</span></dt>
<dd><p>The <a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero
GPL</a>
requires that modified versions of the software offer all users
-interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity</em></ins></span>
to <span class="inserted"><ins><em>receive
-the source. What the company</em></ins></span> is <span
class="removed"><del><strong>hardly
-“private” use,</strong></del></span> <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>doing falls under that meaning,</em></ins></span> so
<span class="removed"><del><strong>it would be legitimate to
require</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
-company must</em></ins></span> release <span
class="removed"><del><strong>of</strong></del></span> the <span
class="inserted"><ins><em>modified</em></ins></span> source <span
class="removed"><del><strong>code in that special case. Developers who wish to
address this
-might want to use the
-<a href="/licenses/agpl.html">GNU Affero GPL</a> for
programs
-designed for network server use.</p></dd></strong></del></span>
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>code.</p></dd></em></ins></span>
+interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity to receive
+the source. What the company is doing falls under that meaning, so the
+company must release the modified source code.</p></dd>
<dt id="InternalDistribution">Is making and using multiple copies
within one organization or company “distribution”?
@@ -3953,7 +3945,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/05/07 21:59:00 $
+$Date: 2018/08/16 07:33:29 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff...,
GNUN <=