www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff...


From: GNUN
Subject: www/licenses gpl-faq.it.html po/gpl-faq.it-diff...
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 03:33:29 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     GNUN <gnun>     18/08/16 03:33:29

Modified files:
        licenses       : gpl-faq.it.html 
        licenses/po    : gpl-faq.it-diff.html 

Log message:
        Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/gpl-faq.it.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.31&r2=1.32
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.4&r2=1.5

Patches:
Index: gpl-faq.it.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/gpl-faq.it.html,v
retrieving revision 1.31
retrieving revision 1.32
diff -u -b -r1.31 -r1.32
--- gpl-faq.it.html     31 May 2018 20:30:08 -0000      1.31
+++ gpl-faq.it.html     16 Aug 2018 07:33:28 -0000      1.32
@@ -1,4 +1,9 @@
-<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html" -->
+<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
+ value='<a href="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po">
+ https://www.gnu.org/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it.po</a>'
+ --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.html"
+ --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html"
+ --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2018-06-17" --><!--#set 
var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/licenses/gpl-faq.en.html" -->
 
 <!--#include virtual="/server/header.it.html" -->
 <!-- Parent-Version: 1.84 -->
@@ -47,6 +52,7 @@
 
 <!--#include virtual="/licenses/po/gpl-faq.translist" -->
 <!--#include virtual="/server/banner.it.html" -->
+<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.it.html" -->
 <h2>Domande ricorrenti sulle licenze GNU</h2>
 
 <!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.it.html" -->
@@ -3909,7 +3915,7 @@
 <p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
 Ultimo aggiornamento:
 
-$Date: 2018/05/31 20:30:08 $
+$Date: 2018/08/16 07:33:28 $
 
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>

Index: po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html,v
retrieving revision 1.4
retrieving revision 1.5
diff -u -b -r1.4 -r1.5
--- po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html     7 May 2018 21:59:00 -0000       1.4
+++ po/gpl-faq.it-diff.html     16 Aug 2018 07:33:29 -0000      1.5
@@ -193,11 +193,11 @@
     &ldquo;aggregate&rdquo; and other kinds of &ldquo;modified
     versions&rdquo;?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
-    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#AggregateContainers"&gt;When it comes to 
determining
+    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#AggregateContainers"&gt;When it comes to determining
     whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
     that the code is in one or more containers have any 
effect?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
   
-    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a</em></ins></span> href="#AssignCopyright"&gt;Why does the 
FSF require that
+    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#AssignCopyright"&gt;Why does the FSF require that
     contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign copyright to the
     FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should I do this,
     too?  If so, how?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
@@ -430,12 +430,12 @@
     version of a GPL'ed program on a web site.  Does the GPL say they
     must release their modified sources?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
-    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"&gt;A company is running a 
modified
+    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"&gt;A company is running a 
modified
     version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
     web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
     sources?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
-    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a</em></ins></span> href="#InternalDistribution"&gt;Is use 
within one organization
+    &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#InternalDistribution"&gt;Is use within one 
organization
     or company &ldquo;distribution&rdquo;?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
 
     &lt;li&gt;&lt;a href="#StolenCopy"&gt;If someone steals a CD containing a
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@
 for more details.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 
along
-with this program; if not, see &lt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+with this program; if not, see <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;https://www.gnu.org/licenses&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</em></ins></span>
 
 &lt;p&gt;Additional permission under GNU GPL version 3 section 7&lt;/p&gt;
 
@@ -1355,7 +1355,7 @@
 for more details.&lt;/p&gt;
 
 &lt;p&gt;You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License 
along
-with this program; if not, see &lt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
+with this program; if not, see <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>&lt;http://www.gnu.org/licenses&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</strong></del></span>
 <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>&lt;https://www.gnu.org/licenses&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</em></ins></span>
  
 &lt;p&gt;Linking &lt;var&gt;[name of your program]&lt;/var&gt; statically or 
dynamically with
 other modules is making a combined work based on &lt;var&gt;[name of your
@@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@
 could be a basis to consider the two parts as combined into a larger
 program.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
-&lt;dt <span class="inserted"><ins><em>id="AggregateContainers"&gt;When it 
comes to determining
+&lt;dt id="AggregateContainers"&gt;When it comes to determining
     whether two pieces of software form a single work, does the fact
     that the code is in one or more containers have any effect?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#AggregateContainers"
@@ -2015,7 +2015,7 @@
 href="#MereAggregation"&gt;single work or an
 aggregate&lt;/a&gt; is unchanged by the involvement of 
containers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
-&lt;dt</em></ins></span> id="AssignCopyright"&gt;Why does
+&lt;dt id="AssignCopyright"&gt;Why does
     the FSF require that contributors to FSF-copyrighted programs assign
     copyright to the FSF?  If I hold copyright on a GPL'ed program, should
     I do this, too?  If so, how?
@@ -2421,37 +2421,29 @@
 The GPL permits anyone to make a modified version and use it without
 ever distributing it to others. What this company is doing is a special
 case of that. Therefore, the company does not have to release the
-modified <span class="removed"><del><strong>sources.&lt;/p&gt;
-
-&lt;p&gt;It</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>sources. The 
situation</em></ins></span> is <span class="removed"><del><strong>essential for 
people</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>different when the 
modified program
+modified sources. The situation is different when the modified program
 is licensed under the terms of the &lt;a
 href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"&gt;GNU Affero GPL&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
 
-&lt;p&gt;Compare this</em></ins></span> to <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>have</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>a situation where</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>freedom</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>web site contains or links</em></ins></span> to <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>make modifications and
-use them privately, without ever publishing those modifications.  However,
-putting</strong></del></span>
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed 
to the user when they
+&lt;p&gt;Compare this to a situation where the web site contains or links to
+separate GPL'ed programs that are distributed to the user when they
 visit the web site (often written in &lt;a
 href="/philosophy/javascript-trap.html"&gt;JavaScript&lt;/a&gt;, but other
 languages are used as well). In this situation the source code for the
-programs being distributed must be released to the user 
under</em></ins></span> the
-<span class="inserted"><ins><em>terms of the GPL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
+programs being distributed must be released to the user under the
+terms of the GPL.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 &lt;dt id="UnreleasedModsAGPL"&gt;A company is running a modified
-    version of a</em></ins></span> program <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>licensed under the GNU Affero GPL 
(AGPL)</em></ins></span> on a <span class="removed"><del><strong>server machine 
for</strong></del></span>
-    <span class="inserted"><ins><em>web site. Does</em></ins></span> the <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>public to talk</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>AGPL say they must release their modified
+    version of a program licensed under the GNU Affero GPL (AGPL) on a
+    web site. Does the AGPL say they must release their modified
     sources?
  &lt;span class="anchor-reference-id"&gt;(&lt;a href="#UnreleasedModsAGPL"
  &gt;#UnreleasedModsAGPL&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/dt&gt;
 &lt;dd&gt;&lt;p&gt;The &lt;a href="/licenses/agpl.html"&gt;GNU Affero 
GPL&lt;/a&gt;
 requires that modified versions of the software offer all users
-interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity</em></ins></span> 
to <span class="inserted"><ins><em>receive
-the source. What the company</em></ins></span> is <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>hardly
-&ldquo;private&rdquo; use,</strong></del></span> <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>doing falls under that meaning,</em></ins></span> so 
<span class="removed"><del><strong>it would be legitimate to 
require</strong></del></span> <span class="inserted"><ins><em>the
-company must</em></ins></span> release <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>of</strong></del></span> the <span 
class="inserted"><ins><em>modified</em></ins></span> source <span 
class="removed"><del><strong>code in that special case.  Developers who wish to 
address this
-might want to use the
-&lt;a href="/licenses/agpl.html"&gt;GNU&nbsp;Affero&nbsp;GPL&lt;/a&gt; for 
programs
-designed for network server use.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</strong></del></span> 
<span class="inserted"><ins><em>code.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;</em></ins></span>
+interacting with it over a computer network an opportunity to receive
+the source. What the company is doing falls under that meaning, so the
+company must release the modified source code.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/dd&gt;
 
 &lt;dt id="InternalDistribution"&gt;Is making and using multiple copies
     within one organization or company &ldquo;distribution&rdquo;?
@@ -3953,7 +3945,7 @@
 
 &lt;p class="unprintable"&gt;Updated:
 &lt;!-- timestamp start --&gt;
-$Date: 2018/05/07 21:59:00 $
+$Date: 2018/08/16 07:33:29 $
 &lt;!-- timestamp end --&gt;
 &lt;/p&gt;
 &lt;/div&gt;



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]