www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/licenses license-list.html


From: John Sullivan
Subject: www/licenses license-list.html
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2018 16:57:36 -0400 (EDT)

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     John Sullivan <johnsu01>        18/06/26 16:57:36

Modified files:
        licenses       : license-list.html 

Log message:
        Add EUPL 1.2.

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.485&r2=1.486

Patches:
Index: license-list.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.html,v
retrieving revision 1.485
retrieving revision 1.486
diff -u -b -r1.485 -r1.486
--- license-list.html   10 Feb 2018 20:52:39 -0000      1.485
+++ license-list.html   26 Jun 2018 20:57:36 -0000      1.486
@@ -1266,9 +1266,10 @@
 piece of code under a dual license, EPL | GPL.) However, the EPL2
 without this designation remains incompatible with the GPL.</p></dd>
 
-<dt><a id="EUPL" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:EUPLv1.1";>
+<dt><a id="EUPL"></a> <!-- old id, leave for compatibility -->
+    <a id="EUPL-1.1" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:EUPLv1.1";>
     European Union Public License (EUPL) version 1.1</a>
-    <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#EUPL">#EUPL</a>)</span></dt>
+    <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a href="#EUPL">#EUPL 
1.1</a>)</span></dt>
 <dd>
 <p>This is a free software license.  By itself, it has a copyleft
 comparable to the GPL's, and incompatible with it.  However, it gives
@@ -1295,6 +1296,33 @@
 Adding that code to the CeCILL-covered program provides grounds to
 relicense it to GPLv3+.</p></dd>
 
+<dt><a id="EUPL-1.2" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:EUPLv1.2";>
+    European Union Public License (EUPL) version 1.2</a>
+    <span class="anchor-reference-id">(<a 
href="#EUPL-1.2">#EUPL</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>This is a free software license. By itself, it has a copyleft
+comparable to the GPL's, and incompatible with it. However, it gives
+recipients ways to relicense the work under the terms of other selected
+licenses, and some of those&mdash;the Eclipse Public License in
+particular&mdash;only provide a weaker copyleft. Thus, developers can't
+rely on this license to provide a strong copyleft.</p>
+
+<p>The EUPL allows relicensing to GPLv2 only and GPLv3 only, because
+those licenses are listed as two of the alternative licenses that users
+may convert to. It also, indirectly, allows relicensing to GPL
+version&nbsp;3 or any later version, because there is a way to relicense
+to the CeCILL v2, and the CeCILL v2 gives a way to relicense to any
+version of the GNU GPL.</p>
+
+<p>To do this two-step relicensing, you need to first write a piece of code
+which you can license under the CeCILL v2, or find a suitable module
+already available that way, and add it to the program. Adding that code
+to the EUPL-covered program provides grounds to relicense it to the
+CeCILL v2. Then you need to write a piece of code which you can license
+under the GPLv3+, or find a suitable module already available that way,
+and add it to the program. Adding that code to the CeCILL-covered
+program provides grounds to relicense it to GPLv3+.</p></dd>
+
 <dt><a id="gnuplot"
        href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:Gnuplot";>
     Gnuplot license</a>
@@ -2723,7 +2751,7 @@
 
 <p class="unprintable">Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2018/02/10 20:52:39 $
+$Date: 2018/06/26 20:57:36 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]