[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www distros/common-distros.pl.html distros/po/c...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www distros/common-distros.pl.html distros/po/c... |
|
Date: |
Mon, 1 May 2017 13:30:38 -0400 (EDT) |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 17/05/01 13:30:36
Modified files:
distros : common-distros.pl.html
distros/po : common-distros.pl-en.html
philosophy : free-sw.pl.html not-ipr.pl.html
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html
philosophy/po : free-sw.pl-en.html not-ipr.pl-en.html
open-source-misses-the-point.pl-en.html
open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
proprietary : malware-apple.ru.html malware-google.ru.html
malware-microsoft.ru.html
malware-mobiles.ru.html
proprietary/po : malware-apple.ru-en.html malware-apple.ru.po
malware-google.ru-en.html malware-google.ru.po
malware-microsoft.ru-en.html
malware-microsoft.ru.po
malware-mobiles.ru-en.html
malware-mobiles.ru.po
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/common-distros.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.69&r2=1.70
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/distros/po/common-distros.pl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.40&r2=1.41
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.115&r2=1.116
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/not-ipr.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.37&r2=1.38
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.47&r2=1.48
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.pl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.33&r2=1.34
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.29&r2=1.30
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.70&r2=1.71
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-apple.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.36&r2=1.37
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-google.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-microsoft.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/malware-mobiles.ru.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.22&r2=1.23
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.35&r2=1.36
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.108&r2=1.109
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.9&r2=1.10
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.30&r2=1.31
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.41&r2=1.42
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.127&r2=1.128
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru.po?cvsroot=www&r1=1.65&r2=1.66
Patches:
Index: distros/common-distros.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/common-distros.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.69
retrieving revision 1.70
diff -u -b -r1.69 -r1.70
--- distros/common-distros.pl.html 18 Nov 2016 07:32:09 -0000 1.69
+++ distros/common-distros.pl.html 1 May 2017 17:30:35 -0000 1.70
@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/distros/po/common-distros.pl.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/distros/po/common-distros.pl.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/distros/common-distros.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/distros/po/common-distros.pl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-03-26" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/distros/common-distros.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
<title>Dlaczego nie popieramy inne systemy - Projekt GNU - Fundacja Wolnego
@@ -17,7 +12,6 @@
<!--#include virtual="/distros/po/common-distros.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Dlaczego nie popieramy innych systemów</h2>
<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.pl.html" -->
@@ -102,9 +96,8 @@
Debian dostarcza również repozytoria niewolnego oprogramowania. WedÅug
deweloperów to oprogramowanie „nie jest czÄÅciÄ
systemu
Debian”, ale repozytorium jest umieszczone na wielu gÅównych
-serwerach projektu i ludzie Åatwo mogÄ
dowiedzieÄ siÄ o niewolnym
-oprogramowaniu dostÄpnym poprzez przeglÄ
danie bazy danych paczek
-Debiana.</p>
+serwerach projektu i ludzie Åatwo mogÄ
znaleÅºÄ niewolne pakiety
+poprzez przeglÄ
danie bazy danych paczek Debiana oraz ich wiki.</p>
<p>Istnieje również repozytorium „contrib”. Jego paczki sÄ
wolne,
lecz czÄÅÄ z nich istnieje po to, by ÅadowaÄ oddzielnie
@@ -119,6 +112,9 @@
w niektórych przypadkach zaleca niewolne pliki firmware'u dla urzÄ
dzeÅ
peryferyjnych w komputerach.</p>
+<p>Wiki Debiana zawiera strony o instalowaniu niewolnego firmware.</p>
+
+<!-- https://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary -->
<h3 id="Fedora">Fedora</h3>
<p>Fedora posiada czystÄ
politykÄ dotyczÄ
cÄ
tego, co może byÄ doÅÄ
czane
@@ -214,20 +210,6 @@
odróżniÄ które sÄ
wolne</a> ponieważ programy wÅasnoÅciowe,
które można
pobraÄ b ez opÅat, sÄ
oznaczone jako „free”.</p>
-<p>
-Od października 2012 Ubuntu <a
-href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/10/does-ubuntus-amazon-lens-break-eu-law";>wysyÅa
-dane o wyszukiwaniach</a> do serwera Canonical, które wysyÅa reklamy
-zakupów z Amazon. To, ÅciÅle mówiÄ
c, nie zmienia czy Ubuntu jest
-wolnym oprogramowaniem, ale jest pogwaÅceniem prywatnoÅci
-użytkowników. Także popiera kupowanie od Amazon, firmÄ <a
-href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org/";>powiÄ
zanÄ
z DRM</a>
-oraz nieszanujÄ
cÄ
pracowników, autorów i wydawców.</p>
-
-<p>Ten element adware jest jednym z nielicznych przypadków, gdzie
-deweloper wolnego oprogramowania utrzymuje niepożÄ
danÄ
cechÄ w jego
-wersji wolnego programu.</p>
-
<p>Zdaje siÄ, że Ubuntu <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-ubuntu";>zezwala
na komercyjne rozprowadzanie wiernych kopii zachowujÄ
cych znaki
@@ -292,9 +274,9 @@
<h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
<p>ReactOS jest przeznaczony jako wolny system kompatybilny binarnie
-z Windowsem. Umożliwianie ludziom używania oprogramowania
-i sterowników wÅasnoÅciowych przeznaczonych dla Windowsa jest jednym
-z celów projektu. </p>
+z Windowsem. Używanie oprogramowania i sterowników wÅasnoÅciowych
+przeznaczonych dla Windowsa jest jednym z wypowiedzianych celów
+projektu.</p>
<div class="translators-notes">
@@ -356,7 +338,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>Ta strona jest dostÄpna na <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.pl";>licencji
@@ -367,13 +349,14 @@
<div class="translators-credits">
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-TÅumaczenie: Jan Owoc 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, Marcin Wolak 2010, 2011, 2012;
-poprawki: Mariusz Libera 2010, Jan Owoc 2010, 2011, Daniel Oźminkowski
2010.</div>
+TÅumaczenie: Jan Owoc 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015, 2017, Marcin Wolak 2010, 2011,
+2012; poprawki: Mariusz Libera 2010, Jan Owoc 2010, 2011, Daniel Oźminkowski
+2010.</div>
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2016/11/18 07:32:09 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: distros/po/common-distros.pl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/distros/po/common-distros.pl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.40
retrieving revision 1.41
diff -u -b -r1.40 -r1.41
--- distros/po/common-distros.pl-en.html 25 Oct 2015 19:29:22 -0000
1.40
+++ distros/po/common-distros.pl-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:35 -0000
1.41
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<title>Explaining Why We Don't Endorse Other Systems - GNU Project - Free
Software Foundation</title>
<link rel="alternate" title="Free GNU/Linux distributions"
href="http://www.gnu.org/distros/distros.rss";
@@ -86,8 +86,8 @@
repository of nonfree software. According to the project, this
software is “not part of the Debian system,” but the
repository is hosted on many of the project's main servers, and people
-can readily learn about these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's
-online package database.</p>
+can readily find these nonfree packages by browsing Debian's
+online package database and its wiki.</p>
<p>There is also a “contrib” repository; its packages are
free, but some of them exist to load separately distributed
@@ -101,6 +101,9 @@
the problem partly remains: the installer in some cases recommends
these nonfree firmware files for the peripherals on the machine.</p>
+<p>Debian's wiki includes pages about installng nonfree firmware.</p>
+<!-- https://wiki.debian.org/ATIProprietary -->
+
<h3 id="Fedora">Fedora</h3>
<p>Fedora does have a clear policy about what can be included in the
@@ -193,20 +196,6 @@
to tell which ones are free</a> since proprietary programs for
download at no charge are labelled “free”.</p>
-<p>
-Since October 2012, Ubuntu
-<a
href="http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2012/10/does-ubuntus-amazon-lens-break-eu-law";>
-sends personal data about users' searches</a> to a server belonging to
-Canonical, which sends back ads to buy things from Amazon. This does
-not, strictly speaking, affect whether Ubuntu is free software, but it
-is a violation of users' privacy. It also encourages buying from
-Amazon, a company <a href="http://DefectiveByDesign.org/";>associated
-with DRM</a> as well as mistreatment of workers, authors and publishers.</p>
-
-<p>This adware is one of the rare occasions in which a free software
-developer persists in keeping a malicious feature in its version of a
-free program.</p>
-
<p>Ubuntu <a
href="http://www.ubuntu.com/legal/terms-and-policies/intellectual-property-policy#your-use-of-ubuntu";>appears
to permit commercial redistribution of exact copies with the
trademarks</a>; removal of the trademarks is required only for
@@ -270,9 +259,8 @@
<h3 id="ReactOS">ReactOS</h3>
<p>ReactOS is meant as a free binary compatible replacement for
-Windows. Allowing people to continue using the proprietary software
-and drivers meant for Windows is one of the stated goals of the
-project. </p>
+Windows. Use with proprietary software and drivers meant for Windows
+is one of the stated goals of the project.</p>
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
@@ -321,7 +309,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
@@ -331,7 +319,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/10/25 19:29:22 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.115
retrieving revision 1.116
diff -u -b -r1.115 -r1.116
--- philosophy/free-sw.pl.html 23 Apr 2017 11:36:24 -0000 1.115
+++ philosophy/free-sw.pl.html 1 May 2017 17:30:35 -0000 1.116
@@ -1,12 +1,7 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/free-sw.pl.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/free-sw.pl.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/free-sw.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/free-sw.pl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-08-20" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/free-sw.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<!-- This file is automatically generated by GNUnited Nations! -->
<title>Co to Wolne Oprogramowanie? - Projekt GNU - Fundacja Wolnego
Oprogramowania</title>
@@ -19,10 +14,16 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/free-sw.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Co to wolne oprogramowanie?</h2>
-<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.pl.html" -->
+<blockquote class="note" id="fsf-licensing"><p style="font-size: 80%">
+Macie pytanie o licencjach wolnego oprogramowania, na które nie
+znaleźliÅcie tu odpowiedzi? Zobaczcie nasze <a
+href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing";>zasoby o licencjach</a> i, jeÅli to
+konieczne, skontaktujcie siÄ z FSF Compliance Lab pod adresem <a
+href="mailto:address@hidden";>address@hidden</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
+
<h3>Definicja Wolnego Oprogramowania</h3>
<blockquote>
@@ -47,8 +48,8 @@
„wolny”, ale też może oznaczaÄ „darmowy”
– “free” as in “free speech,” not as in
“free beer”</em>]. Czasami nazywamy to „oprogramownie
-libre” [<em>libre software</em>] aby podkreÅliÄ, że nie
-chodzi o cenÄ.
+libre”, pożyczajÄ
c termin z francuskiego lub hiszpaÅskiego,
+[<em>libre software</em>] aby podkreÅliÄ, że nie chodzi o cenÄ.
</p>
<p>
@@ -61,6 +62,8 @@
[<em>ang. proprietary</em>] program jest narzÄdziem niesprawiedliwej wÅadzy.
</p>
+<h4> Cztery niezbÄdne wolnoÅci</h4>
+
<p>
Program jest wolnym oprogramowaniem jeÅli użytkownicy programu majÄ
cztery
niezbÄdne wolnoÅci:
@@ -69,7 +72,7 @@
<ul>
<li>WolnoÅÄ do uruchamiania programu jak chcecie, w dowolnym celu
(wolnoÅÄ 0).</li>
- <li>WolnoÅÄ do analizowania, jak dziaÅa program, i zmieniania go
+ <li>WolnoÅÄ do analizowania, jak dziaÅa program i zmieniania go
aby robiÅ co i jak potrzebujecie (wolnoÅÄ 1). Warunkiem koniecznym
jest dostÄp do kodu źródÅowego.
</li>
@@ -90,32 +93,30 @@
<p>W danym przypadku te wolnoÅci muszÄ
dotyczyÄ kodu, który mamy
zamiar
używaÄ lub skÅaniaÄ innych by używali. PrzykÅadowo, rozważmy
program A,
-który automatycznie uruchamia program B w niektórych przypadkach. JeÅli
-chcemy rozprowadzaÄ program B w tej formie, to oznacza,
+który w niektórych przypadkach automatycznie uruchamia program B. JeÅli
+chcemy rozprowadzaÄ program A w tej formie, to oznacza,
że użytkownicy bÄdÄ
potrzebowali B, wiÄc trzeba sprawdziÄ
czy zarówno A jak i B sÄ
wolnym oprogramowaniem. Jednakże,
jeÅli mamy zamiar zmodyfikowaÄ A aby nie używaÅ B, tylko A musi
-byÄ wolnym; możemy B zignorowaÄ.</p>
+byÄ wolnym; B nie jest czÄÅciÄ
zamiaru.</p>
+
+<p>
+„Wolne oprogramowanie” nie oznacza
+„niekomercyjne”. Wolny program musi byÄ dostÄpny
+do komercyjnego wykorzystywania, komercyjnego rozwijania
+i komercyjnego rozpowszechniania. Komercyjny rozwój wolnych programów
+nie jest już niczym niezwykÅym; takie wolne komercyjne oprogramowanie jest
+bardzo ważne. Możliwe, że zapÅaciliÅcie za kopie wolnych
+programów, mogliÅcie też otrzymaÄ je bezpÅatnie. Ale bez wzglÄdu
+na to, w jaki sposób je otrzymaliÅcie, zawsze macie wolnoÅÄ
+do kopiowania i modyfikowania programów, a nawet <a
+href="/philosophy/selling.html">sprzedawania kopii</a>.
+</p>
<p>Reszta tej strony wyjaÅnia kilka szegóÅów decydujÄ
cych czy dana
wolnoÅÄ
jest wystarczajÄ
ca.</p>
-<p>WolnoÅÄ rozpowszechniania (wolnoÅci 2 i 3) znaczy,
że powinniÅcie
-mieÄ swobodÄ rozpowszechniania kopii, zmodyfikowanych
-bÄ
dź oryginalnych, za darmo bÄ
dź pobierajÄ
c opÅatÄ
-za dystrybucjÄ, <a href="#exportcontrol">wszÄdzie
-i każdemu</a>. WolnoÅÄ robienia tego wszystkiego oznacza (miÄdzy
-innymi), że nie musicie prosiÄ o pozwolenie ani pÅaciÄ
-za nie.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-PowinniÅcie mieÄ również wolnoÅÄ dokonywania zmian w programie
-i wykorzystywania ich prywatnie w pracy czy też dla rozrywki,
-bez wspominania nawet, że istniejÄ
. A jeÅli już
opublikujecie
-dokonane modyfikacje, nie powinniÅcie byÄ zmuszeni do powiadamiania o
-tym kogokolwiek, w jakikolwiek sposób.
-</p>
+<h4>WolnoÅÄ do uruchamiania programu jak chcecie, w dowolnym
celu</h4>
<p>
WolnoÅÄ korzystania z programu oznacza wolnoÅÄ dla każdej osoby
@@ -132,21 +133,13 @@
<p>
WolnoÅÄ aby uruchamiaÄ program jak siÄ chce oznacza, że nie
-zabrania siÄ Wam ani nie powstrzymuje Was. Nie ma to nic wspólnego
-z funkcjonalnoÅciÄ
programu ani czy program robi to, co chcecie
-aby robiÅ.</p>
+zabrania siÄ Wam ani nie powstrzymuje Was od uruchamiania. Nie ma
+to nic wspólnego z funkcjonalnoÅciÄ
programu, ani czy bÄdzie
+funkcjonowaÅ w danym Årodowisku, ani czy program robi to, co
+chcecie aby robiÅ.</p>
-<p>
-WolnoÅÄ do redystrybucji kopii programu musi obejmowaÄ zarówno postaci
-binarne czy wykonywalne programu, jak i kod źródÅowy, zarówno dla
-zmienionych, jak i niezmienionych wersji. (Rozpowszechnianie programów
-w postaci gotowej do uruchomienia jest konieczne dla zachowania
-wygody instalacji wolnych systemów operacyjnych). Nie szkodzi, jeÅli nie da
-siÄ utworzyÄ postaci binarnej czy wykonywalnej (ponieważ
-w niektórych jÄzykach programowania nie ma takiej możliwoÅci), mimo to
-musicie mieÄ wolnoÅÄ do rozpowszechniania takich postaci, jeÅli
-znajdziecie metodÄ ich utworzenia.
-</p>
+<h4>WolnoÅÄ do analizowania, jak dziaÅa program i zmnieniana go
+aby robiÅ co i jak potrzebujecie</h4>
<p>
By wolnoÅci 1 i 3 (wolnoÅci do dokonywania zmian
@@ -179,6 +172,31 @@
</p>
<p>
+To, czy zmiana stanowi udoskonalenie, jest kwestiÄ
subiektywnÄ
. JeÅli
+wasze prawa dokonywania modyfikacji sÄ
ograniczone wyÅÄ
cznie do zmian,
+które ktoŠinny uzna za udoskonalenie, nie jest to wolny program.
+</p>
+
+<h4>WolnoÅÄ do rozpowszechniania kopii: podstawowe zasady</h4>
+
+<p>WolnoÅÄ rozpowszechniania (wolnoÅci 2 i 3) znaczy,
że powinniÅcie
+mieÄ swobodÄ rozpowszechniania kopii, zmodyfikowanych
+bÄ
dź oryginalnych, za darmo bÄ
dź pobierajÄ
c opÅatÄ
+za dystrybucjÄ, <a href="#exportcontrol">wszÄdzie
+i każdemu</a>. WolnoÅÄ robienia tego wszystkiego oznacza (miÄdzy
+innymi), że nie musicie prosiÄ o pozwolenie ani pÅaciÄ
+za nie.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+PowinniÅcie mieÄ również wolnoÅÄ dokonywania zmian w programie
+i wykorzystywania ich prywatnie w pracy czy też dla rozrywki,
+bez wspominania nawet, że istniejÄ
. A jeÅli już
opublikujecie
+dokonane modyfikacje, nie powinniÅcie byÄ zmuszeni do powiadamiania o
+tym kogokolwiek, w jakikolwiek sposób.
+</p>
+
+<p>
WolnoÅÄ 3 to także wolnoÅÄ do udostÄpniania Waszych zmodyfikowanych
wersji jako wolne oprogramowanie. Wolna licencja może również zezwalaÄ
na udostÄpnianie ich na inne sposoby; inaczej mówiÄ
c, nie musi
byÄ
@@ -188,20 +206,26 @@
</p>
<p>
-Aby wszystkie te wolnoÅci nabraÅy rzeczywistego wymiaru, muszÄ
byÄ
-nieodwoÅalne tak dÅugo, jak nie robicie niczego zÅego. Jeżeli autor
-oprogramowania ma prawo unieważnienia licencji, bÄ
dź wstecznego dodania
-ograniczeÅ do warunków, nawet wówczas, gdy nie zrobiliÅcie niczego, co
-by taki krok uzasadniaÅo, to oprogramowanie nie jest wolne.
+WolnoÅÄ do redystrybucji kopii programu musi obejmowaÄ zarówno postaci
+binarne czy wykonywalne programu, jak i kod źródÅowy, zarówno dla
+zmienionych, jak i niezmienionych wersji. (Rozpowszechnianie programów
+w postaci gotowej do uruchomienia jest konieczne dla zachowania
+wygody instalacji wolnych systemów operacyjnych). Nie szkodzi, jeÅli nie da
+siÄ utworzyÄ postaci binarnej czy wykonywalnej (ponieważ
+w niektórych jÄzykach programowania nie ma takiej możliwoÅci), mimo to
+musicie mieÄ wolnoÅÄ do rozpowszechniania takich postaci, jeÅli
+znajdziecie metodÄ ich utworzenia.
</p>
+<h4>Copyleft</h4>
+
<p>
-Jednakże pewne rodzaje zasad dotyczÄ
cych sposobu rozpowszechniania wolnego
+Pewne rodzaje zasad dotyczÄ
cych sposobu rozpowszechniania wolnego
oprogramowania sÄ
akceptowalne, pod warunkiem, że nie stojÄ
w sprzecznoÅci z zasadniczymi wolnoÅciami. Na przykÅad, <a
href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a> (w dużym uproszczeniu) jest
zasadÄ
, która mówi, że przy redystrybucji programu nie możecie
-wprowadzaÄ ograniczeÅ odmawiajÄ
c wolnoÅci innym. ReguÅa ta nie jest
+wprowadzaÄ ograniczeÅ odmawiajÄ
c gÅównych swobód innym. ReguÅa ta nie
jest
sprzeczna z gÅównymi swobodami użytkowników, a raczej je chroni.
</p>
@@ -217,31 +241,14 @@
i niewolnego oprogramowania</a>.
</p>
-<p>
-„Wolne oprogramowanie” nie oznacza
-„niekomercyjne”. Wolny program musi byÄ dostÄpny
-do komercyjnego wykorzystywania, komercyjnego rozwijania
-i komercyjnego rozpowszechniania. Komercyjny rozwój wolnych programów
-nie jest już niczym niezwykÅym; takie wolne komercyjne oprogramowanie jest
-bardzo ważne. Możliwe, że zapÅaciliÅcie za kopie wolnych
-programów, mogliÅcie też otrzymaÄ je bezpÅatnie. Ale bez wzglÄdu
-na to, w jaki sposób je otrzymaliÅcie, zawsze macie wolnoÅÄ
-do kopiowania i modyfikowania programów, a nawet <a
-href="/philosophy/selling.html">sprzedawania kopii</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-To, czy zmiana stanowi udoskonalenie, jest kwestiÄ
subiektywnÄ
. JeÅli
-wasze prawa dokonywania modyfikacji sÄ
ograniczone wyÅÄ
cznie do zmian,
-które ktoŠinny uzna za udoskonalenie, nie jest to wolny program.
-</p>
+<h4>ReguÅy co do sczegóÅów tworzenia pakietu
i rozprowadzania</h4>
<p>
Ustalanie reguÅ tworzenia pakietu ze zmienionÄ
wersjÄ
jest dopuszczalne,
jeÅli tylko owe reguÅy w istotny sposób nie ograniczajÄ
Waszej
wolnoÅci
do rozpowszechniania zmodyfikowanych wersji lub tworzenia takich
wersji i używania ich prywatnie. Jest dopuszczalne aby licencja
-wymagaÅa wymagaÅa zmianÄ nazwy modyfikowanej wersji, usuniÄcia logo,
+wymagaÅa zmianÄ nazwy modyfikowanej wersji, usuniÄcia logo,
lub oznaczenia zmian jako Wasze. Takie wymagania sÄ
dopuszczalne tak
dÅugo jak nie sÄ
tak dokuczliwe, że uniemożliwiajÄ
jakiekolwiek
zmiany;
skoro i tak robicie pewne zmiany w programie, kilka dodatkowych
@@ -267,6 +274,8 @@
tylko jeÅli jest prosty sposób wyznaczenia aliasu aby zmodyfikowana
wersja mogÅa byÄ wywoÅywana przez alias oryginalnej.</p>
+<h4>Przepisy eksportowe</h4>
+
<p>
Czasami rzÄ
dowe <a id="exportcontrol">przepisy kontroli eksportu</a>
i sankcje handlowe mogÄ
ograniczaÄ waszÄ
wolnoÅÄ rozpowszechniania
@@ -290,6 +299,16 @@
że wymóg jest nietrywialny a oprogramowanie stanie siÄ niewolne.
</p>
+<h4>Zagadnienia prawne</h4>
+
+<p>
+Aby wszystkie te wolnoÅci nabraÅy rzeczywistego wymiaru, muszÄ
byÄ
+nieodwoÅalne tak dÅugo, jak nie robicie niczego zÅego. Jeżeli autor
+oprogramowania ma prawo unieważnienia licencji, bÄ
dź wstecznego dodania
+ograniczeÅ do warunków, nawet wówczas, gdy nie zrobiliÅcie niczego, co
+by taki krok uzasadniaÅo, to oprogramowanie nie jest wolne.
+</p>
+
<p>
Wolna licencja nie może wymagaÄ zgody na warunki licencji niewolnego
programu. PrzykÅadowo, jeÅli licencja wymaga abyÅcie przestrzegali licencji
@@ -304,6 +323,8 @@
i drugie.
</p>
+<h4>Licencje na bazie kontraktu</h4>
+
<p>
WiÄkszoÅÄ licencji wolnego oprogramowania bazuje na prawie autorskim,
a istniejÄ
pewne granice tego, jakie wymagania można naÅożyÄ
@@ -328,6 +349,8 @@
jest wolna.
</p>
+<h4>Używanie wÅaÅciwych okreÅleÅ gdy mowa o wolnym oprogramowaniu</h4>
+
<p>
MówiÄ
c o wolnym oprogramowaniu, najlepiej unikaÄ okreÅleÅ takich jak
„rozdawaÄ” czy „bezpÅatny”, gdyż niejawnie
@@ -341,6 +364,8 @@
„free software”</a> na różne jÄzyki.
</p>
+<h4>Jak interpretujemy te kryteria</h4>
+
<p>
Na koniec, warto zauważyÄ, że takie kryteria, jak ustanowione
w tej definicji wolnego oprogramowania, wymagajÄ
uważnego namysÅu
@@ -358,6 +383,8 @@
licencje kwalifikujÄ
siÄ bÄ
dź nie.
</p>
+<h4>Pomoc z wolnymi licencjami</h4>
+
<p>
JeÅli jesteÅcie ciekawi, czy konkretna licencja kwalifikuje siÄ jako
licencja wolnego oprogramowania, zajrzyjcie do naszej <a
@@ -429,6 +456,11 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.152&r2=1.153";>Version
+1.153</a>: DoprecyzowaÄ, że wolnoÅÄ do uruchamiania programu
+oznacza, że nic Was nie powstrzymuje aby go uruchomiÄ.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.140&r2=1.141";>Version
1.141</a>: WyjaÅniÄ jaki kod musi byÄ wolny.</li>
@@ -562,8 +594,9 @@
<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11";>Wersja
-1.11</a>: Informacja, że wolna licencja może wymagaÄ od was
-wysÅania kopi wersji którÄ
rozpowszechniacie autorowi oryginaÅu.</li>
+1.11</a>: Informacja, że wolna licencja może wymagaÄ od Was
+wysÅania kopi wersji którÄ
rozpowszechniacie poprzednim autorom, jeÅli o to
+poproszÄ
.</li>
</ul>
@@ -636,7 +669,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2004-2007, 2009-2016 Free Software Foundation,
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2004-2007, 2009-2017 Free Software Foundation,
Inc.</p>
<p>Ta strona jest dostÄpna na <a rel="license"
@@ -649,13 +682,12 @@
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
TÅumaczenie: Wojciech Kotwica 2001-2006, Mariusz Libera 2010, Tomasz
-KozÅowski 2010, Jan Owoc 2012-2014; poprawki: Jan Owoc 2010, 2011, 2015,
-2016.</div>
+KozÅowski 2010, Jan Owoc 2012-2017; poprawki: Jan Owoc 2010, 2011.</div>
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2017/04/23 11:36:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/not-ipr.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/not-ipr.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.37
retrieving revision 1.38
diff -u -b -r1.37 -r1.38
--- philosophy/not-ipr.pl.html 24 Apr 2017 10:01:10 -0000 1.37
+++ philosophy/not-ipr.pl.html 1 May 2017 17:30:35 -0000 1.38
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE" value="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-11-09" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE" value="/philosophy/not-ipr.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -14,7 +9,6 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>„WÅasnoÅÄ intelektualna” to zwodniczy miraż</h2>
<p><a href="http://www.stallman.org/";>Richard M. Stallman</a></p>
@@ -241,6 +235,16 @@
</p>
<p>
+Odrzucenie „wÅasnoÅci intelektualnej” to nie tylko zabawa
+filozoficzna. Ten zwrot robi prawdziwÄ
szkodÄ. Apple używaÅ go aby <a
+href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/nebraska-farmers-right-to-repair-bill-stalls-apple";>wypaczyÄ
+debatÄ o ustawie w stanie Nebraska o „prawie
+do naprawy”</a>. To podrobione pojÄcie daÅo Apple sposób
+aby ukryÄ swoje stanowisko o tajemnicach, które jest sprzeczne ze
+swobodami klientów, jako domniemana zasada której muszÄ
ulec i klienci
+i paÅstwo.</p>
+
+<p>
Jeżeli chcecie poprawnie myÅleÄ o sprawach zwiÄ
zanych
z prawem patentowym, prawem autorskim, prawem o znakach
handlowych, lub którymkolwiek innym prawie, pierwszym krokiem jest
@@ -279,6 +283,10 @@
href="http://torrentfreak.com/language-matters-framing-the-copyright-monopoly-so-we-can-keep-our-liberties-130714/";>
Rickard Falkvinge wspiera odrzucenie tego terminu</a>.</p>
+<p><a
+href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2016/11/cory-doctorow-sole-and-despotic-dominion/";>Cory
+Doctorow także potÄpia</a> termin „wÅasnoÅÄ
intelektualna”.</p>
+
<div class="translators-notes">
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't have notes.-->
@@ -330,14 +338,17 @@
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
document was modified, or published.
+
If you wish to list earlier years, that is ok too.
Either "2001, 2002, 2003" or "2001-2003" are ok for specifying
years, as long as each year in the range is in fact a copyrightable
year, i.e., a year in which the document was published (including
being publicly visible on the web or in a revision control system).
+
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard M. Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 Richard
+M. Stallman</p>
<p>Ta strona jest dostÄpna na <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/deed.pl";>licencji
@@ -348,13 +359,13 @@
<div class="translators-credits">
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-TÅumaczenie: Kamil Ignacak 2005, Jan Owoc 2014, 2015; poprawki: Wojciech
-Kotwica 2006, Mariusz Libera 2010, Jan Owoc 2011, 2013.</div>
+TÅumaczenie: Kamil Ignacak 2005, Jan Owoc 2014, 2015, 2017; poprawki:
+Wojciech Kotwica 2006, Mariusz Libera 2010, Jan Owoc 2011, 2013.</div>
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2017/04/24 10:01:10 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html,v
retrieving revision 1.47
retrieving revision 1.48
diff -u -b -r1.47 -r1.48
--- philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html 24 Apr 2017 10:01:10
-0000 1.47
+++ philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.html 1 May 2017 17:30:35
-0000 1.48
@@ -1,9 +1,4 @@
-<!--#set var="PO_FILE"
- value='<a href="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po">
- https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po</a>'
- --><!--#set var="ORIGINAL_FILE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.html"
- --><!--#set var="DIFF_FILE"
value="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-diff.html"
- --><!--#set var="OUTDATED_SINCE" value="2016-05-02" -->
+<!--#set var="ENGLISH_PAGE"
value="/philosophy/open-source-misses-the-point.en.html" -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.pl.html" -->
<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
@@ -14,7 +9,6 @@
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.translist"
-->
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.pl.html" -->
-<!--#include virtual="/server/outdated.pl.html" -->
<h2>Dlaczego otwartemu oprogramowaniu umyka idea Wolnego Oprogramowania</h2>
<p><strong>Richard Stallman</strong></p>
@@ -365,6 +359,12 @@
„sprzedawaÄ” oprogramowanie bardziej efektywnie niektórym
użytkownikom, szczególnie biznesowym.</p>
+<p>Gdy zwolennicy open source rozmawiajÄ
o czymÅ wiÄcej, zwykle chodzi o
+„darowiźnie” kodu źródÅowego dla ludzkoÅci. PrzedstawiajÄ
c to
+jako wyjÄ
tkowo dobry uczynek, ponad to co jest moralnie wymagane, zakÅada,
+że rozprowadzanie oprogramowania wÅasnoÅciowego bez kodu
+źródÅowego jest moralnie dopuszczalne.</p>
+
<p>To podejÅcie okazaÅo siÄ skuteczne. Retoryka otwartego oprogramowania
przekonaÅa wielu, by używaÄ go w biznesie i do celów prywatnych,
a nawet rozwijaÄ wolne oprogramowanie, które rozszerzyÅo naszÄ
@@ -437,11 +437,11 @@
<p>DziaÅacze wolnego oprogramowania sÄ
zalecani aby odmawiaÄ pracy
nad przedsiÄwziÄciami, które nazywajÄ
siÄ „otwarte”.
Nawet
jeÅli aktywnoÅÄ jest dobra sama w sobie, każdy wspóÅudziaÅ powoduje
-trochÄ szkody na boku. Jest wiele innych dobrych aktywnoÅci, które
-nazywajÄ
siÄ „wolne” lub „libre”. Każda pomóc
-w tych projektach powoduje trochÄ dobra na boku. Z tyloma
-pożytecznymi projektami do wyboru, dlaczego nie wybraÄ takiego, które
-ma dodatkowe dobro?</p>
+trochÄ szkody na boku, promujÄ
c ideaÅy open source. Jest wiele innych
+dobrych aktywnoÅci, które nazywajÄ
siÄ „wolne”
+lub „libre”. Każda pomóc w tych projektach powoduje
+trochÄ dobra na boku. Z tyloma pożytecznymi projektami
+do wyboru, dlaczego nie wybraÄ takiego, które ma dodatkowe dobro?</p>
<h3>Wnioski</h3>
@@ -527,13 +527,13 @@
<div class="translators-credits">
<!--TRANSLATORS: Use space (SPC) as msgstr if you don't want credits.-->
-TÅumaczenie: Marek Sadowski 2010, Jan Owoc 2014, 2015; poprawki Jan Owoc
-2010, 2011, 2013, 2016, Tomasz W. KozÅowski 2010, 2012.</div>
+TÅumaczenie: Marek Sadowski 2010, Jan Owoc 2014, 2015, 2017; poprawki Jan
+Owoc 2010, 2011, 2013, 2016, Tomasz W. KozÅowski 2010, 2012.</div>
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Aktualizowane:
-$Date: 2017/04/24 10:01:10 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:35 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/free-sw.pl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.pl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.33
retrieving revision 1.34
diff -u -b -r1.33 -r1.34
--- philosophy/po/free-sw.pl-en.html 30 Jan 2016 03:59:04 -0000 1.33
+++ philosophy/po/free-sw.pl-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.34
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<title>What is free software?
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
@@ -10,7 +10,13 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/banner.html" -->
<h2>What is free software?</h2>
-<!--#include virtual="/licenses/fsf-licensing.html" -->
+
+<blockquote class="note" id="fsf-licensing"><p style="font-size: 80%">
+Have a question about free software licensing not answered here?
+See our other <a href="http://www.fsf.org/licensing";>licensing resources</a>,
+and if necessary contact the FSF Compliance Lab
+at <a href="mailto:address@hidden";>address@hidden</a>.</p>
+</blockquote>
<h3>The Free Software Definition</h3>
@@ -33,7 +39,9 @@
liberty, not price. To understand the concept, you should think of
“free” as in “free speech,” not as in
“free beer”. We sometimes call it “libre
-software” to show we do not mean it is gratis.
+software,” borrowing the French or Spanish word for
+“free” as in freedom, to show we do not mean the software
+is gratis.
</p>
<p>
@@ -47,6 +55,8 @@
an instrument of unjust power</a>.
</p>
+<h4> The four essential freedoms</h4>
+
<p>
A program is free software if the program's users have the
four essential freedoms:
@@ -81,25 +91,23 @@
handle some cases. If we plan to distribute A as it stands, that
implies users will need B, so we need to judge whether both A and B
are free. However, if we plan to modify A so that it doesn't use B,
-only A needs to be free; we can ignore B.</p>
+only A needs to be free; B is not pertinent to that plan.</p>
+
+<p>
+“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial”. A free
+program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
+and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software
+is no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important.
+You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have
+obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies,
+you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to
+<a href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
+</p>
<p>The rest of this page clarifies certain points about what makes
specific freedoms adequate or not.</p>
-<p>Freedom to distribute (freedoms 2 and 3) means you are free to
-redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either
-gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
-<a href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>. Being free to do these
-things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay
-for permission to do so.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them
-privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they
-exist. If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to
-notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way.
-</p>
+<h4>The freedom to run the program as you wish</h4>
<p>
The freedom to run the program means the freedom for any kind of person
@@ -114,20 +122,12 @@
<p>
The freedom to run the program as you wish means that you are not
-forbidden or stopped from doing so. It has nothing to do with what
-functionality the program has, or whether it is useful for what you
-want to do.</p>
+forbidden or stopped from making it run. This has nothing to do with what
+functionality the program has, whether it is technically capable of
+functioning in any given environment, or whether it is useful for any
+particular computing activity.</p>
-<p>
-The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable
-forms of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and
-unmodified versions. (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary
-for conveniently installable free operating systems.) It is OK if there
-is no way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program
-(since some languages don't support that feature), but you must have the
-freedom to redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to
-make them.
-</p>
+<h4>The freedom to study the source code and make changes</h4>
<p>
In order for freedoms 1 and 3 (the freedom to make changes and the
@@ -158,6 +158,29 @@
</p>
<p>
+Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.
+If your right to modify a program is limited, in substance, to changes that
+someone else considers an improvement, that program is not free.
+</p>
+
+<h4>The freedom to redistribute if you wish: basic requirements</h4>
+
+<p>Freedom to distribute (freedoms 2 and 3) means you are free to
+redistribute copies, either with or without modifications, either
+gratis or charging a fee for distribution, to
+<a href="#exportcontrol">anyone anywhere</a>. Being free to do these
+things means (among other things) that you do not have to ask or pay
+for permission to do so.
+</p>
+
+<p>
+You should also have the freedom to make modifications and use them
+privately in your own work or play, without even mentioning that they
+exist. If you do publish your changes, you should not be required to
+notify anyone in particular, or in any particular way.
+</p>
+
+<p>
Freedom 3 includes the freedom to release your modified versions
as free software. A free license may also permit other ways of
releasing them; in other words, it does not have to be
@@ -167,15 +190,20 @@
</p>
<p>
-In order for these freedoms to be real, they must be permanent and
-irrevocable as long as you do nothing wrong; if the developer of the
-software has the power to revoke the license, or retroactively add
-restrictions to its terms, without your doing anything wrong to give
-cause, the software is not free.
+The freedom to redistribute copies must include binary or executable
+forms of the program, as well as source code, for both modified and
+unmodified versions. (Distributing programs in runnable form is necessary
+for conveniently installable free operating systems.) It is OK if there
+is no way to produce a binary or executable form for a certain program
+(since some languages don't support that feature), but you must have the
+freedom to redistribute such forms should you find or develop a way to
+make them.
</p>
+<h4>Copyleft</h4>
+
<p>
-However, certain kinds of rules about the manner of distributing free
+Certain kinds of rules about the manner of distributing free
software are acceptable, when they don't conflict with the central
freedoms. For example, <a href="/copyleft/copyleft.html">copyleft</a>
(very simply stated) is the rule that when redistributing the program,
@@ -197,25 +225,10 @@
relate to each other.
</p>
-<p>
-“Free software” does not mean “noncommercial”. A free
-program must be available for commercial use, commercial development,
-and commercial distribution. Commercial development of free software
-is no longer unusual; such free commercial software is very important.
-You may have paid money to get copies of free software, or you may have
-obtained copies at no charge. But regardless of how you got your copies,
-you always have the freedom to copy and change the software, even to
-<a href="/philosophy/selling.html">sell copies</a>.
-</p>
-
-<p>
-Whether a change constitutes an improvement is a subjective matter.
-If your right to modify a program is limited, in substance, to changes that
-someone else considers an improvement, that program is not free.
-</p>
+<h4>Rules about packaging and distribution details</h4>
<p>
-However, rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable,
+Rules about how to package a modified version are acceptable,
if they don't substantively limit your freedom to release modified
versions, or your freedom to make and use modified versions privately.
Thus, it is acceptable for the license to require that you change the
@@ -247,6 +260,8 @@
facility that allows you to specify the original program's name as an
alias for the modified version.</p>
+<h4>Export regulations</h4>
+
<p>
Sometimes government <a id="exportcontrol">export control regulations</a>
and trade sanctions can constrain your freedom to distribute copies of
@@ -269,6 +284,16 @@
software nonfree.
</p>
+<h4>Legal considerations</h4>
+
+<p>
+In order for these freedoms to be real, they must be permanent and
+irrevocable as long as you do nothing wrong; if the developer of the
+software has the power to revoke the license, or retroactively add
+restrictions to its terms, without your doing anything wrong to give
+cause, the software is not free.
+</p>
+
<p>
A free license may not require compliance with the license of a
nonfree program. Thus, for instance, if a license requires you to
@@ -283,6 +308,8 @@
law applies, or where litigation must be done, or both.
</p>
+<h4>Contract-based licenses</h4>
+
<p>
Most free software licenses are based on copyright, and there are limits
on what kinds of requirements can be imposed through copyright. If a
@@ -302,6 +329,8 @@
it is nonfree.
</p>
+<h4>Use the right words when talking about free software</h4>
+
<p>
When talking about free software, it is best to avoid using terms
like “give away” or “for free,” because those terms
imply that
@@ -313,6 +342,8 @@
“free software”</a> into various languages.
</p>
+<h4>How we interpret these criteria</h4>
+
<p>
Finally, note that criteria such as those stated in this free software
definition require careful thought for their interpretation. To decide
@@ -327,6 +358,8 @@
it easier to see why certain licenses do or don't qualify.
</p>
+<h4>Get help with free licenses</h4>
+
<p>
If you are interested in whether a specific license qualifies as a free
software license, see our <a href="/licenses/license-list.html">list
@@ -390,6 +423,10 @@
<ul>
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.152&r2=1.153";>Version
+1.153</a>: Clarify that freedom to run the program means nothing stops
+you from making it run.</li>
+
<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.140&r2=1.141";>Version
1.141</a>: Clarify which code needs to be free.</li>
@@ -496,7 +533,7 @@
<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.10&r2=1.11";>Version
1.11</a>: Note that a free license may require you to send a copy of
-versions you distribute to the author.</li>
+versions you distribute to previous developers on request.</li>
</ul>
@@ -556,7 +593,7 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2004-2007, 2009-2016
+<p>Copyright © 1996, 2002, 2004-2007, 2009-2017
Free Software Foundation, Inc.</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
@@ -567,7 +604,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/30 03:59:04 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl-en.html 17 May 2015 16:58:13 -0000 1.21
+++ philosophy/po/not-ipr.pl-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.22
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<title>Did You Say “Intellectual Property”? It's a Seductive
Mirage
- GNU Project - Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/not-ipr.translist" -->
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
Property” Organization (WIPO), and only became really common in recent
years. (WIPO is formally a UN organization, but in fact represents the
interests of the holders of copyrights, patents, and trademarks.) Wide use
dates from
-<a
href="http://ngrams.googlelabs.com/graph?content=intellectual+property&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=0&smoothing=1";>around
+<a
href="https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=intellectual+property&year_start=1800&year_end=2008&corpus=15&smoothing=1&share=&direct_url=t1%3B%2Cintellectual%20property%3B%2Cc0";>around
1990</a>. (<a href="/graphics/seductivemirage.png">Local image copy</a>)
</p>
@@ -207,6 +207,15 @@
</p>
<p>
+Rejection of “intellectual property” is not mere
+philosophical recreation. The term does real harm. Apple used it
+to <a
href="https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/11/nebraska-farmers-right-to-repair-bill-stalls-apple";>warp
debate about Nebraska's
+“right to repair” bill</a>. The bogus concept gave
+Apple a way to dress up its preference for secrecy, which conficts
+with its customers' rights, as a supposed principle that customers
+and the state must yield to.</p>
+
+<p>
If you want to think clearly about the issues raised by patents, or
copyrights, or trademarks, or various other different laws, the first
step is to
@@ -241,6 +250,11 @@
<a
href="http://torrentfreak.com/language-matters-framing-the-copyright-monopoly-so-we-can-keep-our-liberties-130714/";>
Rickard Falkvinge supports rejection of this term</a>.</p>
+<p><a
+href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2016/11/cory-doctorow-sole-and-despotic-dominion/";>
+Cory Doctorow also condemns</a> the term “intellectual
+property.”</p>
+
</div><!-- for id="content", starts in the include above -->
<!--#include virtual="/server/footer.html" -->
<div id="footer">
@@ -273,7 +287,7 @@
<!-- Regarding copyright, in general, standalone pages (as opposed to
files generated as part of manuals) on the GNU web server should
- be under CC BY-ND 3.0 US. Please do NOT change or remove this
+ be under CC BY-ND 4.0. Please do NOT change or remove this
without talking with the webmasters or licensing team first.
Please make sure the copyright date is consistent with the
document. For web pages, it is ok to list just the latest year the
@@ -288,17 +302,17 @@
There is more detail about copyright years in the GNU Maintainers
Information document, www.gnu.org/prep/maintain. -->
-<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015 Richard M. Stallman</p>
+<p>Copyright © 2004, 2006, 2010, 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 Richard M.
Stallman</p>
<p>This page is licensed under a <a rel="license"
-href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/3.0/us/";>Creative
-Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States License</a>.</p>
+href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/";>Creative
+Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License</a>.</p>
<!--#include virtual="/server/bottom-notes.html" -->
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2015/05/17 16:58:13 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.29
retrieving revision 1.30
diff -u -b -r1.29 -r1.30
--- philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-en.html 30 Jan 2016
03:59:05 -0000 1.29
+++ philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl-en.html 1 May 2017
17:30:36 -0000 1.30
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
<!--#include virtual="/server/header.html" -->
-<!-- Parent-Version: 1.77 -->
+<!-- Parent-Version: 1.79 -->
<title>Why Open Source Misses the Point of Free Software - GNU Project -
Free Software Foundation</title>
<!--#include virtual="/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.translist"
-->
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
“free software” has some kind of semantic problem—and
this includes “open source software.”</p>
-<p>The <a href="http://opensource.org/docs/osd";>official definition of
+<p>The <a href="https://opensource.org/osd";>official definition of
“open source software”</a> (which is published by the Open
Source Initiative and is too long to include here) was derived
indirectly from our criteria for free software. It is not the same;
@@ -162,8 +162,8 @@
that anyone can get copies of its source code files.” I don't
think he deliberately sought to reject or dispute the official
definition. I think he simply applied the conventions of the English
-language to come up with a meaning for the term.
-The <a
href="https://web.archive.org/web/@*20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf";>state
+language to come up with a meaning for the term. The <a
+href="https://web.archive.org/web/20001011193422/http://da.state.ks.us/ITEC/TechArchPt6ver80.pdf";>state
of Kansas</a> published a similar definition: “Make use of
open-source software (OSS). OSS is software for which the source code
is freely and publicly available, though the specific licensing
@@ -312,6 +312,12 @@
certain free software, they might be able to “sell” the
software more effectively to certain users, especially business.</p>
+<p>When open source proponents talk about anything deeper than that,
+it is usually the idea of making a “gift” of source code
+to humanity. Presenting this as a special good deed, beyond what is
+morally required, presumes that distributing proprietary software
+without source code is morally legitimate.</p>
+
<p>This approach has proved effective, in its own terms. The rhetoric
of open source has convinced many businesses and individuals to use,
and even develop, free software, which has extended our
@@ -378,11 +384,11 @@
<p>Thus, free software activists are well advised to decline to work
on an activity that calls itself “open.” Even if the
activity is good in and of itself, each contribution you make does a
-little harm on the side. There are plenty of other good activities
-which call themselves “free” or “libre.” Each
-contribution to those projects does a little extra good on the side.
-With so many useful projects to choose from, why not choose one
-which does extra good?</p>
+little harm on the side by promoting the open source idea. There are
+plenty of other good activities which call themselves
+“free” or “libre.” Each contribution to those
+projects does a little extra good on the side. With so many useful
+projects to choose from, why not choose one which does extra good?</p>
<h3>Conclusion</h3>
@@ -453,7 +459,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2016/01/30 03:59:05 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po,v
retrieving revision 1.70
retrieving revision 1.71
diff -u -b -r1.70 -r1.71
--- philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 1 May 2017 16:50:32
-0000 1.70
+++ philosophy/po/open-source-misses-the-point.pl.po 1 May 2017 17:30:36
-0000 1.71
@@ -654,8 +654,8 @@
msgstr ""
"Presja ze strony wytwórni muzycznych i filmowych powoduje, że w "
"oprogramowaniu nastÄpuje wzrost rozwiÄ
zaÅ ograniczajÄ
cych użytkowników.
Ta "
-"zÅoÅliwa cecha znana jest jako „Digital Restrictions Management "
-"(DRM)” [zarzÄ
dzanie cyfrowymi ograniczeniami] (strona <a
href=\"http://";
+"zÅoÅliwa cecha znana jest jako „Digital Restrictions Management (DRM)"
+"” [zarzÄ
dzanie cyfrowymi ograniczeniami] (strona <a href=\"http://";
"defectivebydesign.org/\">DefectiveByDesign.org</a> jest temu poÅwiÄcona) "
"i jest zaprzeczeniem ducha wolnoÅci, które to oprogramowanie ma "
"dostarczaÄ. I nie tylko ducha. Ponieważ celem DRM jest zdeptanie "
Index: proprietary/malware-apple.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-apple.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.36
retrieving revision 1.37
diff -u -b -r1.36 -r1.37
--- proprietary/malware-apple.ru.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000 1.36
+++ proprietary/malware-apple.ru.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.37
@@ -140,8 +140,8 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">УÑзвимоÑÑÑ</h3>
-<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, в оÑлиÑие оÑ
оÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов они не ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ
-вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
+<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они,
в оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
+ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок.</p>
<ul>
@@ -533,7 +533,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðбновлено:
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: proprietary/malware-google.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-google.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- proprietary/malware-google.ru.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000 1.9
+++ proprietary/malware-google.ru.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.10
@@ -119,8 +119,8 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">УÑзвимоÑÑÑ</h3>
-<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, в оÑлиÑие оÑ
оÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов они не ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ
-вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
+<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они,
в оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
+ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок.</p>
<ul>
@@ -309,7 +309,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðбновлено:
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: proprietary/malware-microsoft.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-microsoft.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- proprietary/malware-microsoft.ru.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000
1.41
+++ proprietary/malware-microsoft.ru.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.42
@@ -112,8 +112,8 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">УÑзвимоÑÑÑ</h3>
-<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, в оÑлиÑие оÑ
оÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов они не ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ
-вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
+<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они,
в оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
+ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок.</p>
<ul>
@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðбновлено:
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: proprietary/malware-mobiles.ru.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/malware-mobiles.ru.html,v
retrieving revision 1.22
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -b -r1.22 -r1.23
--- proprietary/malware-mobiles.ru.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000 1.22
+++ proprietary/malware-mobiles.ru.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.23
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">УÑзвимоÑÑÑ</h3>
-<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, в оÑлиÑие оÑ
оÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов они не ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ
-вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
+<p>ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они,
в оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
+ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ
пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок.</p>
<ul>
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@
<p class="unprintable"><!-- timestamp start -->
Ðбновлено:
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.35
retrieving revision 1.36
diff -u -b -r1.35 -r1.36
--- proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000
1.35
+++ proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.36
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">Apple Insecurity</h3>
-<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file
+<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file
they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the
supposition that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave
bugs.</p>
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.108
retrieving revision 1.109
diff -u -b -r1.108 -r1.109
--- proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru.po 1 May 2017 16:36:49 -0000 1.108
+++ proprietary/po/malware-apple.ru.po 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.109
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-05-01 16:25+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -282,20 +281,13 @@
msgstr "УÑзвимоÑÑÑ"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | These bugs are/were not intentional, {+so+} unlike the rest of the file
-# | they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition
-# | that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file they do "
-#| "not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
-#| "prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgid ""
"These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file they do "
"not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
"prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgstr ""
-"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ "
-"вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
+"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не "
+"ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
"пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок."
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.9
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -u -b -r1.9 -r1.10
--- proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000
1.9
+++ proprietary/po/malware-google.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.10
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">Google Insecurity</h3>
-<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file
+<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file
they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the
supposition that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave
bugs.</p>
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.30
retrieving revision 1.31
diff -u -b -r1.30 -r1.31
--- proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po 1 May 2017 16:36:49 -0000 1.30
+++ proprietary/po/malware-google.ru.po 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000 1.31
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-05-01 16:26+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "Google's Software Is Malware - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -238,20 +237,13 @@
msgstr "УÑзвимоÑÑÑ"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | These bugs are/were not intentional, {+so+} unlike the rest of the file
-# | they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition
-# | that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file they do "
-#| "not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
-#| "prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgid ""
"These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file they do "
"not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
"prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgstr ""
-"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ "
-"вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
+"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не "
+"ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
"пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок."
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.41
retrieving revision 1.42
diff -u -b -r1.41 -r1.42
--- proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000
1.41
+++ proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.42
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">Microsoft Insecurity</h3>
-<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file
+<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file
they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the
supposition that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave
bugs.</p>
@@ -450,7 +450,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.127
retrieving revision 1.128
diff -u -b -r1.127 -r1.128
--- proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru.po 1 May 2017 16:36:50 -0000
1.127
+++ proprietary/po/malware-microsoft.ru.po 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.128
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-05-01 16:26+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid ""
@@ -249,20 +248,13 @@
msgstr "УÑзвимоÑÑÑ"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | These bugs are/were not intentional, {+so+} unlike the rest of the file
-# | they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition
-# | that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file they do "
-#| "not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
-#| "prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgid ""
"These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file they do "
"not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
"prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgstr ""
-"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ "
-"вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
+"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не "
+"ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
"пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок."
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 13:59:24 -0000
1.20
+++ proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru-en.html 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.21
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@
<h3 id="insecurity">Mobile Insecurity</h3>
-<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file
+<p>These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file
they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the
supposition that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave
bugs.</p>
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
<p class="unprintable">Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2017/05/01 13:59:24 $
+$Date: 2017/05/01 17:30:36 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru.po
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru.po,v
retrieving revision 1.65
retrieving revision 1.66
diff -u -b -r1.65 -r1.66
--- proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru.po 1 May 2017 16:36:50 -0000
1.65
+++ proprietary/po/malware-mobiles.ru.po 1 May 2017 17:30:36 -0000
1.66
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"
-"X-Outdated-Since: 2017-05-01 16:26+0000\n"
#. type: Content of: <title>
msgid "Malware in Mobile Devices - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation"
@@ -212,20 +211,13 @@
msgstr "УÑзвимоÑÑÑ"
#. type: Content of: <p>
-# | These bugs are/were not intentional, {+so+} unlike the rest of the file
-# | they do not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition
-# | that prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs.
-#| msgid ""
-#| "These bugs are/were not intentional, unlike the rest of the file they do "
-#| "not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
-#| "prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgid ""
"These bugs are/were not intentional, so unlike the rest of the file they do "
"not count as malware. We mention them to refute the supposition that "
"prestigious proprietary software doesn't have grave bugs."
msgstr ""
-"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не
ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ "
-"вÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ Ñпоминаем
иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
+"ÐÑи оÑибки непÑеднамеÑеннÑ, Ñак ÑÑо они, в
оÑлиÑие Ð¾Ñ Ð¾ÑÑалÑнÑÑ
пÑимеÑов, не "
+"ÑÑиÑаÑÑÑÑ Ð²ÑедоноÑнÑми оÑобенноÑÑÑми. ÐÑ
Ñпоминаем иÑ
, ÑÑÐ¾Ð±Ñ Ð¾Ð¿ÑовеÑгнÑÑÑ "
"пÑедположение, ÑÑо в пÑеÑÑижнÑÑ
неÑвободнÑÑ
пÑогÑаммаÑ
Ð½ÐµÑ ÑеÑÑезнÑÑ
оÑибок."
#. type: Content of: <ul><li><p>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www distros/common-distros.pl.html distros/po/c...,
GNUN <=