[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
www education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html license...
|
From: |
GNUN |
|
Subject: |
www education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html license... |
|
Date: |
Sun, 09 Mar 2014 12:28:44 +0000 |
CVSROOT: /web/www
Module name: www
Changes by: GNUN <gnun> 14/03/09 12:28:44
Modified files:
education/po : edu-schools.es-en.html
licenses : license-list.es.html license-list.fr.html
licenses/po : license-list.es-en.html license-list.fr-en.html
philosophy : free-sw.es.html free-sw.fr.html
philosophy/po : free-sw.es-en.html free-sw.fr-en.html
Log message:
Automatic update by GNUnited Nations.
CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.20&r2=1.21
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.62&r2=1.63
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/license-list.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.169&r2=1.170
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/license-list.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.44&r2=1.45
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.59&r2=1.60
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.es.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.71&r2=1.72
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.122&r2=1.123
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.es-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.32&r2=1.33
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.fr-en.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.42&r2=1.43
Patches:
Index: education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.20
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -b -r1.20 -r1.21
--- education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html 6 Mar 2014 11:59:31 -0000 1.20
+++ education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:42 -0000 1.21
@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@
for doing so.</p>
<p>This benefit is useful, but we firmly refuse to give it first place,
-because it is shallow compared to the important ethical issues at at
+because it is shallow compared to the important ethical issues at
stake. Moving schools to free software is more than a way to make
education a little “better”: it is a matter of doing good
education instead of bad education. So let's consider the deeper
@@ -190,7 +190,7 @@
<p>
Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/03/06 11:59:31 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:42 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: licenses/license-list.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.62
retrieving revision 1.63
diff -u -b -r1.62 -r1.63
--- licenses/license-list.es.html 30 Jan 2014 19:59:06 -0000 1.62
+++ licenses/license-list.es.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:43 -0000 1.63
@@ -1512,12 +1512,14 @@
<p>Si el código fuente no está acompañado de una licencia que otorgue a los
usuarios las cuatro libertades esenciales, no es software libre.</p>
-<p>Algunos programadores piensan que el código que no tiene licencia está en
el
-dominio público. Según la actual ley de copyright, no es asÃ. Más bien,
-todas las obras que se pueden poner bajo copyright no son libres por
-defecto, incluyendo los programas informáticos. En algunos paÃses, los
-usuarios que descargan código desprovisto de licencia pueden violar el
-copyright simplemente si compilan o ejecutan el código. </p>
+<p>Algunos programadores piensan que el código que no tiene licencia está <a
+href="#PublicDomain">en el dominio público</a>. Según la actual ley de
+copyright, no es asÃ. Más bien, todas las obras que se pueden poner bajo
+copyright, incluyendo los programas informáticos, tienen copyright si no se
+especifica lo contrario. Los usuarios no tienen ninguna libertad si no
+existe una licencia que la otorgue. En algunos paÃses, los usuarios que
+descargan código desprovisto de licencia pueden violar el copyright
+simplemente si compilan o ejecutan el código.</p>
<p>Para que un programa sea libre, quienes poseen el copyright sobre el mismo
deben otorgar a los usuarios las <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html">cuatro
@@ -1525,6 +1527,14 @@
libertades se denomina <em>licencia de software libre</em>. Es esta la
función de las licencias de software libre.</p>
+<p>El código escrito por los empleados del Gobierno de los Estados Unidos de
+América constituye una excepción especial debido a que, según la ley de
+copyright de ese paÃs, dicho código está en el dominio público. Sin
embargo,
+esto no se aplica a las obras que una empresa escribe por encargo del
+Gobierno de los EE. UU. Tampoco se aplica a otros paÃses, en muchos de los
+cuales está permitido que el Estado posea el copyright de las obras escritas
+por Gobierno. </p>
+
<p>En algunos paÃses los autores están autorizados a poner el código en el
dominio público, pero para eso es necesario seguir un procedimiento
especÃfico. Si desea poner su código en el dominio público, el método que
@@ -1624,6 +1634,14 @@
con permisos adicionales para el enlazado con programas privativos.</p></dd>
+<dt><a id="DOR" href="http://dorepository.org/download.html";><cite>CNRI Digital
+Object Repository License Agreement</cite></a> <span
+class="anchor-reference-id"> (<a href="#DOR">#DOR</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>Esta licencia no es libre debido al ArtÃculo 3, que incluirÃa el requisito
+de no violar la licencia de <em>ningún</em> programa que el usuario ejecute,
+incluso programas privativos.</p></dd>
+
<dt><a id="GPL-PA" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:GPL-PA";> GPL
para
Programas de Computación de la Administración Pública</a> <span
class="anchor-reference-id"> (<a href="#GPL-PA">#GPL-PA</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2278,7 +2296,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2014/01/30 19:59:06 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:43 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: licenses/license-list.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/license-list.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.169
retrieving revision 1.170
diff -u -b -r1.169 -r1.170
--- licenses/license-list.fr.html 29 Jan 2014 12:01:38 -0000 1.169
+++ licenses/license-list.fr.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:43 -0000 1.170
@@ -1527,12 +1527,14 @@
<p>Si le code source ne comporte pas de licence donnant aux utilisateurs les
quatre libertés, ce n'est pas du logiciel libre.</p>
-<p>Certains développeurs pensent que le code sans licence est dans le domaine
-public. Ce n'est pas vrai dans le cadre du droit actuel du copyright ;
-toutes les Åuvres relevant du copyright sont non libres par défaut, y
-compris les programmes. Dans certains pays, les utilisateurs qui
-téléchargent du code sans licence peuvent être en infraction du seul fait de
-le compiler ou de l'exécuter.</p>
+<p>Certains développeurs pensent que le code sans licence est <a
+href="#PublicDomain">dans le domaine public</a>. Ce n'est pas vrai dans le
+cadre du droit actuel du copyright ; toutes les Åuvres relevant du copyright
+sont sous copyright par défaut, y compris les programmes. En l'absence de
+licence accordant la liberté aux utilisateurs, ces derniers n'en ont
+aucune. Dans certains pays, les utilisateurs qui téléchargent du code sans
+licence peuvent être en infraction du seul fait de le compiler ou de
+l'exécuter.</p>
<p>Pour qu'un programme soit libre, les personnes qui en détiennent le
copyright doivent octroyer explicitement aux utilisateurs les <a
@@ -1541,6 +1543,13 @@
libre</em>. C'est pour cela qu'ont été conçues les licences de logiciel
libre.</p>
+<p>Le code écrit par les employés du gouvernement des Ãtats-Unis constitue
une
+exception, puisque le droit américain du copyright le met explicitement dans
+le domaine public ; mais cela ne s'applique pas au code dont l'écriture est
+sous-traitée à une entreprise par l'Ãtat américain contre rémunération.
Cela
+ne s'applique pas non plus aux autres pays, dont un grand nombre autorise
+l'Ãtat à posséder un copyright sur les écrits du gouvernement.</p>
+
<p>Certains pays autorisent les auteurs à mettre leur code dans le domaine
public, mais cela nécessite une action explicite. Si c'est ce que vous
voulez faire, la méthode que nous recommandons est d'utiliser la <a
@@ -1640,6 +1649,15 @@
en plus l'autorisation de faire des liaisons avec des programmes non
libres.</p></dd>
+<dt><a id="DOR" href="http://dorepository.org/download.html";> <abbr
+title="Corporation for National Research Initiatives">CNRI</abbr> Digital
+Object Repository License Agreement</a> <span class="anchor-reference-id">
+(<a href="#DOR">#DOR</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>Cette licence est non libre à cause de l'article 3, dont on peut soutenir
+qu'il inclut une obligation de ne violer la licence d'<em>aucun</em> des
+programmes que l'utilisateur exécute â même les programmes
privateurs.</p></dd>
+
<dt><a id="GPL-PA" href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:GPL-PA";>GPL pour
les programmes informatiques de l'administration publique</a> <span
class="anchor-reference-id"> (<a href="#GPL-PA">#GPL-PA</a>)</span></dt>
@@ -2314,7 +2332,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2014/01/29 12:01:38 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:43 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: licenses/po/license-list.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/license-list.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.45
diff -u -b -r1.44 -r1.45
--- licenses/po/license-list.es-en.html 30 Jan 2014 19:59:06 -0000 1.44
+++ licenses/po/license-list.es-en.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:43 -0000 1.45
@@ -1555,11 +1555,13 @@
<p>If source code does not carry a license to give users the
four essential freedoms, it is not free software.</p>
-<p>Some developers think that code with no license is in the public
-domain. That is not true under today's copyright law; rather, all
-copyrightable works are nonfree by default. This includes programs.
-In some countries, users that download code with no license may
-infringe copyright merely by compiling it or running it.</p>
+<p>Some developers think that code with no license
+is <a href="#PublicDomain">in the public domain</a>. That is not true
+under today's copyright law; rather, all copyrightable works are
+copyrighted by default. This includes programs. Absent a license to
+grant users freedom, they don't have any. In some countries, users
+that download code with no license may infringe copyright merely by
+compiling it or running it.</p>
<p>In order for a program to be free, its copyright holders must
explicitly grant users the <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html"> four
@@ -1567,6 +1569,12 @@
a <em>free software license</em>. This is what free software
licenses are for.</p>
+<p>Code written by employees of the US government is a special
+exception, since US copyright law explicitly puts that in the public
+domain; but this does not apply to works that the US pays a company to
+write. It also does not apply to other countries, many of which do
+allow the state to have a copyright on government writings.</p>
+
<p>Some countries allow authors to put code in the public domain, but
that requires explicit action. If you wish to do that, the method we
recommend is to use <a href="#CC0">CC0</a>, which also works in other
@@ -1668,6 +1676,16 @@
additional permission for linking with nonfree programs.</p></dd>
+<dt><a id="DOR"
+ href="http://dorepository.org/download.html";>
+ CNRI Digital Object Repository License Agreement</a>
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">
+ (<a href="#DOR">#DOR</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>This license is non-free because of Article 3, which arguably
+includes a requirement not to violate the license of <em>any</em>
+program that the user runs—even proprietary programs.</p></dd>
+
<dt><a id="GPL-PA"
href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:GPL-PA";>
GPL for Computer Programs of the Public Administration</a>
@@ -2314,7 +2332,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/01/30 19:59:06 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:43 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.59
retrieving revision 1.60
diff -u -b -r1.59 -r1.60
--- licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html 29 Jan 2014 12:01:38 -0000 1.59
+++ licenses/po/license-list.fr-en.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:43 -0000 1.60
@@ -1555,11 +1555,13 @@
<p>If source code does not carry a license to give users the
four essential freedoms, it is not free software.</p>
-<p>Some developers think that code with no license is in the public
-domain. That is not true under today's copyright law; rather, all
-copyrightable works are nonfree by default. This includes programs.
-In some countries, users that download code with no license may
-infringe copyright merely by compiling it or running it.</p>
+<p>Some developers think that code with no license
+is <a href="#PublicDomain">in the public domain</a>. That is not true
+under today's copyright law; rather, all copyrightable works are
+copyrighted by default. This includes programs. Absent a license to
+grant users freedom, they don't have any. In some countries, users
+that download code with no license may infringe copyright merely by
+compiling it or running it.</p>
<p>In order for a program to be free, its copyright holders must
explicitly grant users the <a href="/philosophy/free-sw.html"> four
@@ -1567,6 +1569,12 @@
a <em>free software license</em>. This is what free software
licenses are for.</p>
+<p>Code written by employees of the US government is a special
+exception, since US copyright law explicitly puts that in the public
+domain; but this does not apply to works that the US pays a company to
+write. It also does not apply to other countries, many of which do
+allow the state to have a copyright on government writings.</p>
+
<p>Some countries allow authors to put code in the public domain, but
that requires explicit action. If you wish to do that, the method we
recommend is to use <a href="#CC0">CC0</a>, which also works in other
@@ -1668,6 +1676,16 @@
additional permission for linking with nonfree programs.</p></dd>
+<dt><a id="DOR"
+ href="http://dorepository.org/download.html";>
+ CNRI Digital Object Repository License Agreement</a>
+ <span class="anchor-reference-id">
+ (<a href="#DOR">#DOR</a>)</span></dt>
+<dd>
+<p>This license is non-free because of Article 3, which arguably
+includes a requirement not to violate the license of <em>any</em>
+program that the user runs—even proprietary programs.</p></dd>
+
<dt><a id="GPL-PA"
href="http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:GPL-PA";>
GPL for Computer Programs of the Public Administration</a>
@@ -2314,7 +2332,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/01/29 12:01:38 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:43 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.es.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.es.html,v
retrieving revision 1.71
retrieving revision 1.72
diff -u -b -r1.71 -r1.72
--- philosophy/free-sw.es.html 23 Feb 2014 16:41:55 -0000 1.71
+++ philosophy/free-sw.es.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:44 -0000 1.72
@@ -263,6 +263,15 @@
</p>
<p>
+Una licencia libre no puede exigir la conformidad con la licencia de un
+programa que no es libre. AsÃ, por ejemplo, si una licencia requiere que se
+cumpla con las licencias de «todos los programas que se usan», en el caso de
+un usuario que ejecuta programas que no son libres este requisito implicarÃa
+cumplir con las licencias de esos programas privativos, lo cual hace que la
+licencia no sea libre.
+</p>
+
+<p>
Es aceptable que una licencia especifique la jurisdicción de competencia o
la sede para la resolución de conflictos, o ambas cosas.
</p>
@@ -379,6 +388,11 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.130&r2=1.131";>Version
+1.131</a>: Una licencia libre no puede exigir la conformidad con una
+licencia de otro programa que no es libre . </li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.128&r2=1.129";>Versión
1.129</a>: Especificar que está permitido determinar la jurisdicción y el
foro judicial de competencia (esta siempre ha sido nuestra polÃtica).</li>
@@ -585,7 +599,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
Ãltima actualización:
-$Date: 2014/02/23 16:41:55 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:44 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/free-sw.fr.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/free-sw.fr.html,v
retrieving revision 1.122
retrieving revision 1.123
diff -u -b -r1.122 -r1.123
--- philosophy/free-sw.fr.html 23 Feb 2014 18:28:12 -0000 1.122
+++ philosophy/free-sw.fr.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:44 -0000 1.123
@@ -275,6 +275,15 @@
</p>
<p>
+Une licence libre ne peut pas exiger qu'on se conforme à la licence d'un
+programme non libre. Ainsi par exemple, si une licence exige le respect des
+licences de « tous les programmes que vous utilisez », et que l'utilisateur
+exécute des programmes non libres, cela l'obligerait à respecter les
+licences de ces programmes non libres, et rendrait par conséquent la licence
+non libre.
+</p>
+
+<p>
Il est acceptable qu'une licence libre précise la juridiction dont le droit
s'applique, la cour compétente pour régler les litiges, ou bien les deux.
</p>
@@ -395,6 +404,11 @@
<ul>
<li><a
+href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.130&r2=1.131";>Version
+1.131</a>: Une licence libre ne peut pas exiger qu'on se conforme à une
+licence non libre d'un autre programme.</li>
+
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.128&r2=1.129";>Version
1.129</a> : énonce explicitement qu'il est permis de choisir le droit
applicable et de spécifier la cour compétente (cela a toujours été notre
@@ -616,7 +630,7 @@
<p><!-- timestamp start -->
Dernière mise à jour :
-$Date: 2014/02/23 18:28:12 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:44 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
Index: philosophy/po/free-sw.es-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.es-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.32
retrieving revision 1.33
diff -u -b -r1.32 -r1.33
--- philosophy/po/free-sw.es-en.html 23 Feb 2014 16:41:56 -0000 1.32
+++ philosophy/po/free-sw.es-en.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:44 -0000 1.33
@@ -254,6 +254,15 @@
</p>
<p>
+A free license may not require compliance with the license of a
+nonfree program. Thus, for instance, if a license requires you to
+comply with the licenses of “all the programs you use”, in
+the case of a user that runs nonfree programs this would require
+compliance with the licenses of those nonfree programs; that makes the
+license nonfree.
+</p>
+
+<p>
It is acceptable for a free license to specify which jurisdiction's
law applies, or where litigation must be done, or both.
</p>
@@ -365,6 +374,10 @@
<ul>
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.130&r2=1.131";>Version
+1.131</a>: A free license may not require compliance with a nonfree license
+of another program.</li>
+
<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.128&r2=1.129";>Version
1.129</a>: State explicitly that choice of law and choice of forum
specifications are allowed. (This was always our policy.)</li>
@@ -526,7 +539,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/02/23 16:41:56 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:44 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
Index: philosophy/po/free-sw.fr-en.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/po/free-sw.fr-en.html,v
retrieving revision 1.42
retrieving revision 1.43
diff -u -b -r1.42 -r1.43
--- philosophy/po/free-sw.fr-en.html 23 Feb 2014 18:28:13 -0000 1.42
+++ philosophy/po/free-sw.fr-en.html 9 Mar 2014 12:28:44 -0000 1.43
@@ -254,6 +254,15 @@
</p>
<p>
+A free license may not require compliance with the license of a
+nonfree program. Thus, for instance, if a license requires you to
+comply with the licenses of “all the programs you use”, in
+the case of a user that runs nonfree programs this would require
+compliance with the licenses of those nonfree programs; that makes the
+license nonfree.
+</p>
+
+<p>
It is acceptable for a free license to specify which jurisdiction's
law applies, or where litigation must be done, or both.
</p>
@@ -365,6 +374,10 @@
<ul>
+<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.130&r2=1.131";>Version
+1.131</a>: A free license may not require compliance with a nonfree license
+of another program.</li>
+
<li><a
href="http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/www/philosophy/free-sw.html?root=www&r1=1.128&r2=1.129";>Version
1.129</a>: State explicitly that choice of law and choice of forum
specifications are allowed. (This was always our policy.)</li>
@@ -526,7 +539,7 @@
<p>Updated:
<!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2014/02/23 18:28:13 $
+$Date: 2014/03/09 12:28:44 $
<!-- timestamp end -->
</p>
</div>
| [Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- www education/po/edu-schools.es-en.html license...,
GNUN <=