www-commits
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

www/philosophy copyright-versus-community.html


From: Richard M. Stallman
Subject: www/philosophy copyright-versus-community.html
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 09:39:51 +0000

CVSROOT:        /web/www
Module name:    www
Changes by:     Richard M. Stallman <rms>       12/10/29 09:39:51

Modified files:
        philosophy     : copyright-versus-community.html 

Log message:
        Add footnote to explain "shouldn't replace".

CVSWeb URLs:
http://web.cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/www/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html?cvsroot=www&r1=1.21&r2=1.22

Patches:
Index: copyright-versus-community.html
===================================================================
RCS file: /web/www/www/philosophy/copyright-versus-community.html,v
retrieving revision 1.21
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -b -r1.21 -r1.22
--- copyright-versus-community.html     10 Jun 2012 08:06:07 -0000      1.21
+++ copyright-versus-community.html     29 Oct 2012 09:39:51 -0000      1.22
@@ -920,7 +920,7 @@
 our freedom.</p>
 
 <p>Demand that they change the two evil parts of the New Zealand Copyright Act.
-They shouldn't replace the three strikes punishment, because sharing is
+They shouldn't replace the three strikes punishment<a 
href="#footnote1">[2]</a></p>, because sharing is
 good, and they've got to get rid of the censorship for the software to break
 DRM.  Beware of ACTA&mdash;they're trying to negotiate a treaty between various
 countries, for all of these countries to attack their citizens, and we don't
@@ -935,6 +935,16 @@
 <ol>
 <li id="footnote1">In 2010, the encryption system for digital video output was
 definitively cracked.<br /><a 
href="http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2369280,00.asp";>http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2369280,00.asp</a></li>
+<li id="footnote2">New Zealand had enacted a system of punishment
+without trial for Internet users accused of copying; then, facing
+popular protest, the government did not implement it, and announced a
+plan to implement a modified unjust punishment system.  The point here
+was that they should not proceed to implement a replacement &mdash;
+rather, they should have no such system.  However, the words I used
+don't say this clearly.
+<br>
+The New Zealand government subsequently implemented the punishment
+scheme more or less as originally planned.</a></li>
 </ol>
 
 </div>
@@ -969,7 +979,7 @@
 <p>
 Updated:
 <!-- timestamp start -->
-$Date: 2012/06/10 08:06:07 $
+$Date: 2012/10/29 09:39:51 $
 <!-- timestamp end -->
 </p>
 </div>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]