[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?
From: |
Bill Clementson |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl? |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Feb 2008 07:47:08 -0800 |
On 2/21/08, Carlos Konstanski <address@hidden> wrote:
> I have just discovered stumpwm. I love it on my x86 machine, where I
> can let stumpwm run in cmucl.
>
> On my x86_64 machine, however, I am running into issues. I need to
> use a threaded SBCL for website work. This SBCL has the
> much-mentioned keyboard freezing problem when I run stumpwm in it. So
> I am trying clisp, but I haven't worked out all the kinks yet to get
> stumpwm to run in it. I'm sure I'll get it soon, and I'm not seeking
> help for this (yet).
Just curious - what is preventing you from using threaded SBCL for
website work and non-threaded SBCL with StumpWM (e.g. - two separate
SBCL builds)?
- Bill