[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl?
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] which is better: clisp or threaded sbcl? |
Date: |
Fri, 22 Feb 2008 03:00:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 on GNU/Linux |
Hi,
My question for you: if I were to put effort into stumpwm development,
should I direct my efforts towards threaded SBCL stability, or is this
a lesser priority for the project?
Dunno for the project, but I also, in the past, had problems with
SBCL and stumpwm. Since then, I use clisp everywhere without any
glinch (so far). What's more, clisp comes as the default Common
Lisp implementation on my GNU/linux distribution (SBCL is not
part of the official distribution).
As for stumpwn with clisp, no problem. Stumpwm is working well
with it and is responsive.
Xavier
--
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org