[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding
From: |
Yaron M. Minsky |
Subject: |
Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding |
Date: |
Wed, 03 Dec 2003 07:28:58 -0500 |
Nope. Cleaning fixes various problems, but the multiple subkey problem
can only be fixed with cryptographic support, which SKS doesn't have.
(It is possible that a good-enough fix could be achived without
cryptographic support, but I haven't looked into it in detail.)
Functionally, though, the only problem of including the bogus packets is
an increase in size and the annoying messages you saw. So it's not a
huge win to include that key-fixing.
Yaron
On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 06:44, Peter Palfrader wrote:
> On Wed, 03 Dec 2003, Yaron M. Minsky wrote:
>
> > > I wonder if the 'multiple subkey binding' thing is SKS's fault?
> > I believe not. There is a bug in some versions of PKS that mangle the
> > subkeys. SKS keeps both the good and the bad, so you end up with lots
> > of keys with too many subkey binding packets. Hence the message you
> > see.
>
> Hmm ok. I thought sks would 'clean' those keys.
>
> Peter
--
|--------/ Yaron M. Minsky \--------|
|--------\ http://www.cs.cornell.edu/home/yminsky/ /--------|
Open PGP --- KeyID B1FFD916
Fingerprint: 5BF6 83E1 0CE3 1043 95D8 F8D5 9F12 B3A9 B1FF D916
- [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, Peter Palfrader, 2003/12/02
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, David Shaw, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, Jason Harris, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, David Shaw, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, Jason Harris, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, David Shaw, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, Jason Harris, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, David Shaw, 2003/12/03
- Re: [Sks-devel] multiple subkey binding, Werner Koch, 2003/12/04