Re: [Simulavr-devel] why I hate autotools

[Joel Sherrill]

address@hidden wrote:
> > /usr/bin/swig -c++ -python -I/usr/include/python2.5 -o pysimulavr_wrap.cpp
> >     
> ../../cvs0708up/src/pysimulavr.i
>   
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:48: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:52: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:68: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:82: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:93: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:104: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:112: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:122: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:159: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:178: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:193: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> > ../../cvs0708up/src/rwmem.h:207: Warning(362): operator= ignored
> >     
I don't see these.  Where is this included from when the warning
is tripped?  What is the gcc line?
> > g++ -I../../cvs0708up/src -I/usr/include/python2.5 pysimulavr_wrap.cpp \
> >             simulavr_wrap.o \
> >             /usr/lib/libbfd.a -liberty -lc -lm -lncurses -shared \
> >             -o _pysimulavr.so 
> > simulavr_wrap.o: In function `GetSystemClock':
> > /home/hennebry/projects/avr/sim/b0708upp/src/simulavr_wrap.cxx:1772: multiple
> >     
> definition of `GetSystemClock()'
>   
> > /tmp/ccrqePYw.o:pysimulavr_wrap.cpp:(.text+0x16b9): first defined here
> > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
> > make[2]: *** [_pysimulavr.so] Error 1
> > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/hennebry/projects/avr/sim/b0708upp/src'
> > make[1]: *** [all] Error 2
> > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/hennebry/projects/avr/sim/b0708upp/src'
> > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
> >     
>
>   
The same explicit method is in both simulavr.i and pysimulavr.i:

SystemClock &GetSystemClock() { return SystemClock::Instance(); }

It needs to be moved to a third location and just referenced by the various
language interfaces.

Simple matter of duplicate implementation of method being linked in.

> --
> Michael Hennebry
> address@hidden
> "War is only a hobby."
>
>
> ---- Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net


--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
address@hidden        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
  Support Available             (256) 722-9985