simulavr-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Simulavr-devel] why I hate autotools


From: Joel Sherrill
Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] why I hate autotools
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2009 11:40:14 -0500
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090320)

address@hidden wrote:
On Tue Jul  7  9:10 , 'address@hidden' <address@hidden> sent:

On Tue Jul  7  8:51 , ThomasK  sent:

You have appended Makefile.am from root directory. But to compile your
Arrrg. I grabbed the wrong Makefile.am .
I'll have to get home to find the right one.

I'm home.
I've attached src/Makefile.am and the result of
cvs diff -c in the root.

The Makefile.am has "atmega668*".  I thought you were
implementing atmega88 and a atmega168.  Is that a typo.

The other changes are independent.  Text changes.  static
to dynamic libbfd.
./bootstrap -c didn't help.
I've also attached the result of ./bootstrap .
Ahh what host OS are you on?  This appears to
be an issue with autoconf 2.62.  I am on Fedora 10
and have 2.63 which must have fixed this.

Other projects have had users encounter this.  I found
this URL: http://trac.mcs.anl.gov/projects/mpich2/ticket/20

I took a quick look at this. Looks like autoconf-2.62 expects cached variables to be of a certain format. All these variables are within MPE. Is it just a matter of renaming these variables?

If this is simple enough, we should try to fix it for 1.1a2.

I would update the autoconf version.  Even if you have
to install it in a private location just for your use.
--
Michael Hennebry
address@hidden
"War is only a hobby."


---- Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net


--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D.             Director of Research & Development
address@hidden        On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS  Huntsville AL 35805
  Support Available             (256) 722-9985






reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]