[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: log_accum at Savannah
From: |
Derek R. Price |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: log_accum at Savannah |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Jun 2006 10:59:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (Windows/20060516) |
Sylvain Beucler wrote:
>> The short way of saying this is that anything following -S or
>> --separate-diffs that doesn't look like another option will be parsed as
>> an argument to -S.
>>
>> Some acceptable invocations:
>>
>> log_accum -qm address@hidden -S address@hidden %p %{sVv}
>> log_accum -qS -m address@hidden %p %{sVv}
>> log_accum -qm address@hidden --separate-diffs -- %p %{sVv}
>> log_accum -m address@hidden --separate-diffs -q %p %{sVv}
>>
>
> Ok. Maybe it would ease the job if we only accept -S and -S=mail ?
>
> I don't know if GetOpt supports this though.
>
I don't think so. It can be prevented from allowing =, but not limited
to it, on my last reading. I'd just as soon leave it as it is, unless
you have a strong objection to the syntax.
>> If --separate-diffs is specified without any email addresses, diffs will
>> be mailed to the --mail-to address(es).
>>
>
> Ok. Currently nobody uses this at Savannah though.
>
Nobody uses --separate-diffs, or no one uses --separate-diffs sent to
the --mail-to addresses?
> You may want to put back "#! @PERL@ -T" instead of "/usr/bin/perl -T"
> in log_accum.pl - if that's useful.
>
Done. Thanks. It is useful on platforms with Perl in a non-standard
location since configure detects it in the path and fills it in
correctly. I hadn't realized I undid the line.
> Also, you removed the text output stating that a notification was
> sent. I find it useful, because users can see that the notification
> was sent - even if they don't get the mail for some reason. Was it
> intentionnal? Currently I added an "echo" command in loginfo, but it
> is not as accurate as using it directly in log_accum. Would that be
> ok?
>
Removing the message was completely unintentional. I restored something
similar except it prints "sent." at the end, only when successful. I
also added a similar line summarizing the diff status. Is this acceptable?
Regards,
Derek
--
Derek R. Price
CVS Solutions Architect
Get CVS support at Ximbiot <http://ximbiot.com>!
v: +1 248.835.1260
f: +1 248.835.1263
<mailto:address@hidden>