[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: log_accum at Savannah
From: |
Sylvain Beucler |
Subject: |
[Savannah-hackers-public] Re: log_accum at Savannah |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Jun 2006 00:04:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 |
> > Ok. Maybe it would ease the job if we only accept -S and -S=mail ?
> >
> > I don't know if GetOpt supports this though.
> >
>
> I don't think so. It can be prevented from allowing =, but not limited
> to it, on my last reading. I'd just as soon leave it as it is, unless
> you have a strong objection to the syntax.
If that's more simple that way, no problem :)
> >> If --separate-diffs is specified without any email addresses, diffs will
> >> be mailed to the --mail-to address(es).
> >>
> >
> > Ok. Currently nobody uses this at Savannah though.
> >
>
> Nobody uses --separate-diffs, or no one uses --separate-diffs sent to
> the --mail-to addresses?
The latter - do you believe I'd be nasty enough to let you port a
feature that is actually completely useless? ;)
> > Also, you removed the text output stating that a notification was
> > sent. I find it useful, because users can see that the notification
> > was sent - even if they don't get the mail for some reason. Was it
> > intentionnal? Currently I added an "echo" command in loginfo, but it
> > is not as accurate as using it directly in log_accum. Would that be
> > ok?
> >
>
> Removing the message was completely unintentional. I restored something
> similar except it prints "sent." at the end, only when successful. I
> also added a similar line summarizing the diff status. Is this acceptable?
Perfect. I installed it.
--
Sylvain