|
From: | Eric Zolf |
Subject: | Re: cross-platform backup tool Fwd: [rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup] Pre-release v2.1.2b2 - 2nd beta v2.1.2b2 just fixing Windows |
Date: | Thu, 27 Oct 2022 10:31:54 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1 |
Hi On 24/10/2022 23:03, qx6uwumzvv@liamekaens.com wrote:
That's awesome. Thanks for fixing it, and for all your work on rdiff-backup.Just FYI, I started working on implementing https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/740 at the end of September. Unfortunately I have been busy with some other stuff the last couple weeks, but I'm hoping to get back to it soon. If you have any hints or suggestions for how to implement part 1, I would be happy to hear them.
I've split the issue into two as that's what they effectively are: #740 for increment sizes, and #768 for file sizes.
What is your GitHub-user? I would assign the first issue to you so that nobody else works on it. Else I'll comment directly on the issue so that information stays together.
KR, Eric
- PeterOn 2022-10-24 09:44, EricZolf ewl+rdiffbackup-at-lavar.de |rdiff-backup-users| wrote:Hi, On 24/10/2022 09:01, EricZolf wrote:Hi, On 24/10/2022 00:19, qx6uwumzvv@liamekaens.com wrote:Is the need for the extra "\" in 2.12b2 intentional?Am I allowed to answer yes? :DSeriously, I seem to have overseen your first e-mail, sorry for this. Yes, please create a bug report, it would be nice if you could validate if the same issue happens when using / instead of \.No issue more required, I've fixed it on the fly: https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/pull/764Thanks for reporting, EricThanks for testing, sorry again for overseeing you, Eric
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |