qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v11 06/13] tests/qtest: Adjust and document query-cpu-model-e


From: Richard Henderson
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 06/13] tests/qtest: Adjust and document query-cpu-model-expansion test for arm
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2023 08:45:53 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.10.0

On 4/27/23 14:16, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org> writes:

On 4/26/23 19:00, Fabiano Rosas wrote:
We're about to move the 32-bit CPUs under CONFIG_TCG, so adjust the
query-cpu-model-expansion test to check against the cortex-a7, which
is already under CONFIG_TCG. That allows the next patch to contain
only code movement.

While here add comments clarifying what we're testing.

Signed-off-by: Fabiano Rosas<farosas@suse.de>
Suggested-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé<philmd@linaro.org>
---
   tests/qtest/arm-cpu-features.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
   1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

I don't see why you're changing the cpu model here.
Neither cpu will work, of course, but why change?


Because there's already a patch in master that puts the cortex-a7 under
CONFIG_TCG, so I can have the whole if/else in this patch.

If I keep the cortex-a15, this change needs to go into the next patch
("move cpu_tcg to tcg/cpu32.c") which moves the rest of the 32bit cpus,
which was supposed to be only code movement.

Well, I still think the change to a7 is wrong.
If the two patches need to be merged to break bisection,
then so be it -- just mention that fact in the commit message.

Peter, do you agree?


r~



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]