[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] target/riscv: Don't modify SUM with is_debug
From: |
Alistair Francis |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] target/riscv: Don't modify SUM with is_debug |
Date: |
Tue, 11 Apr 2023 14:31:05 +1000 |
On Sat, Mar 25, 2023 at 9:55 PM Richard Henderson
<richard.henderson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> If we want to give the debugger a greater view of memory than
> the cpu, we should simply disable the access check entirely,
> not simply for this one corner case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@wdc.com>
Alistair
> ---
> target/riscv/cpu_helper.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> index b26840e46c..850817edfd 100644
> --- a/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> +++ b/target/riscv/cpu_helper.c
> @@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ static int get_physical_address(CPURISCVState *env,
> hwaddr *physical,
> }
> widened = 2;
> }
> - sum = mmuidx_sum(mmu_idx) || is_debug;
> + sum = mmuidx_sum(mmu_idx);
> switch (vm) {
> case VM_1_10_SV32:
> levels = 2; ptidxbits = 10; ptesize = 4; break;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [PATCH v6 22/25] target/riscv: Don't modify SUM with is_debug,
Alistair Francis <=