[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?
|
From: |
Wang, Wei W |
|
Subject: |
RE: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2023 13:19:33 +0000 |
On Thursday, February 16, 2023 6:56 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> To: Alex Bennée <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>; Pavel Dovgalyuk
> <pavel.dovgaluk@ispras.ru>; qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Richard Henderson
> <richard.henderson@linaro.org>; Mark Burton
> <mburton@qti.qualcomm.com>; Bill Mills <bill.mills@linaro.org>; Marco
> Liebel <mliebel@qti.qualcomm.com>; Alexandre Iooss <erdnaxe@crans.org>;
> Mahmoud Mandour <ma.mandourr@gmail.com>; Emilio Cota
> <cota@braap.org>; Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4bug@amsat.org>; Wang,
> Wei W <wei.w.wang@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: Future of icount discussion for next KVM call?
> For next week we have:
> - more single binary qemu (philippe?)
> - TDX migration from intel.
> We asked them on the previous call to change their design to transfer
> stuff through migration channels and not create a new channel. But I
> haven't heard from intel. (wei?)
> They agreed to send the slides and post the code before continue
> discussion.
Slides attached. For slide5, I'm investigating how to put the function of socat
(i.e. message relaying from the MigTD guest to the remote destination QEMU)
into QEMU, and will update once done.
The code is also being improved and will be shared later.
TDX Live Migration Design Doc.pptx
Description: TDX Live Migration Design Doc.pptx