qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [RFC PATCH 13/16] hw/arm/smmuv3: Add CMDs related to stage 2


From: Eric Auger
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/16] hw/arm/smmuv3: Add CMDs related to stage 2
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2023 12:56:52 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.3.1

Hi Mostafa,

On 2/5/23 10:44, Mostafa Saleh wrote:
> CMD_TLBI_S2_IPA: As S1+S2 is not enabled, for now this can be the
> same as CMD_TLBI_NH_VAA.
>
> CMD_TLBI_S12_VMALL: Added new function to invalidate TLB by VMID.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
> ---
>  hw/arm/smmu-common.c         | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>  hw/arm/smmuv3.c              | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  hw/arm/trace-events          |  2 ++
>  include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h |  1 +
>  4 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> index 028a60949a..28089d94a6 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/smmu-common.c
> @@ -133,6 +133,16 @@ static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_asid(gpointer key, 
> gpointer value,
>  
>      return SMMU_IOTLB_ASID(*iotlb_key) == asid;
>  }
> +
> +static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid(gpointer key, gpointer value,
> +                                         gpointer user_data)
> +{
> +    uint16_t vmid = *(uint16_t *)user_data;
> +    SMMUIOTLBKey *iotlb_key = (SMMUIOTLBKey *)key;
> +
> +    return SMMU_IOTLB_VMID(*iotlb_key) == vmid;
> +}
> +
>  static gboolean smmu_hash_remove_by_asid_vmid_iova(gpointer key, gpointer 
> value,
>                                                gpointer user_data)
>  {
> @@ -185,6 +195,12 @@ void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid)
>      g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_asid, &asid);
>  }
>  
> +inline void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t vmid)
> +{
> +    trace_smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(vmid);
> +    g_hash_table_foreach_remove(s->iotlb, smmu_hash_remove_by_vmid, &vmid);
> +}
> +
>  /* VMSAv8-64 Translation */
>  
>  /**
> diff --git a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> index 8b070f6bb5..2b563a5b1b 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/smmuv3.c
> @@ -1174,14 +1174,35 @@ static int smmuv3_cmdq_consume(SMMUv3State *s)
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_NH_VA:
>              smmuv3_s1_range_inval(bs, &cmd);
>              break;
> +        case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S12_VMALL:
> +            uint16_t vmid = CMD_VMID(&cmd);
> +
> +            if (!STAGE2_SUPPORTED(s->features)) {
if you add such checks for S2, may you should consider adding similar
ones for existing S1?
> +                cmd_error = SMMU_CERROR_ILL;
> +                break;
> +            }
> +
> +            trace_smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_s12_vmid(vmid);
> +            smmu_inv_notifiers_all(&s->smmu_state);
> +            smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(bs, vmid);
> +            break;
> +        case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S2_IPA:
> +            if (!STAGE2_SUPPORTED(s->features)) {
> +                cmd_error = SMMU_CERROR_ILL;
> +                break;
> +            }
> +            /*
> +             * As currently only either s1 or s2 are supported
> +             * we can reuse same function for s2.
> +             */
> +            smmuv3_s1_range_inval(bs, &cmd);
Shouldn't we rename the function then?

Eric
> +            break;
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL3_ALL:
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL3_VA:
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL2_ALL:
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL2_ASID:
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL2_VA:
>          case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_EL2_VAA:
> -        case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S12_VMALL:
> -        case SMMU_CMD_TLBI_S2_IPA:
>          case SMMU_CMD_ATC_INV:
>          case SMMU_CMD_PRI_RESP:
>          case SMMU_CMD_RESUME:
> diff --git a/hw/arm/trace-events b/hw/arm/trace-events
> index 2dee296c8f..61e2ffade5 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/trace-events
> +++ b/hw/arm/trace-events
> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ smmu_ptw_block_pte(int stage, int level, uint64_t baseaddr, 
> uint64_t pteaddr, ui
>  smmu_get_pte(uint64_t baseaddr, int index, uint64_t pteaddr, uint64_t pte) 
> "baseaddr=0x%"PRIx64" index=0x%x, pteaddr=0x%"PRIx64", pte=0x%"PRIx64
>  smmu_iotlb_inv_all(void) "IOTLB invalidate all"
>  smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(uint16_t asid) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d"
> +smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(uint16_t vmid) "IOTLB invalidate vmid=%d"
>  smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(uint16_t asid, uint64_t addr) "IOTLB invalidate asid=%d 
> addr=0x%"PRIx64
>  smmu_inv_notifiers_mr(const char *name) "iommu mr=%s"
>  smmu_iotlb_lookup_hit(uint16_t asid, uint64_t addr, uint32_t hit, uint32_t 
> miss, uint32_t p) "IOTLB cache HIT asid=%d addr=0x%"PRIx64" hit=%d miss=%d 
> hit rate=%d"
> @@ -48,6 +49,7 @@ smmuv3_config_cache_miss(uint32_t sid, uint32_t hits, 
> uint32_t misses, uint32_t
>  smmuv3_s1_range_inval(int vmid, int asid, uint64_t addr, uint8_t tg, 
> uint64_t num_pages, uint8_t ttl, bool leaf) "vmid=%d asid=%d addr=0x%"PRIx64" 
> tg=%d num_pages=0x%"PRIx64" ttl=%d leaf=%d"
>  smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh(void) ""
>  smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_nh_asid(uint16_t asid) "asid=%d"
> +smmuv3_cmdq_tlbi_s12_vmid(uint16_t vmid) "vmid=%d"
>  smmuv3_config_cache_inv(uint32_t sid) "Config cache INV for sid=0x%x"
>  smmuv3_notify_flag_add(const char *iommu) "ADD SMMUNotifier node for iommu 
> mr=%s"
>  smmuv3_notify_flag_del(const char *iommu) "DEL SMMUNotifier node for iommu 
> mr=%s"
> diff --git a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> index 5cca1c17f5..46ba1f6329 100644
> --- a/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> +++ b/include/hw/arm/smmu-common.h
> @@ -181,6 +181,7 @@ SMMUIOTLBKey smmu_get_iotlb_key(uint16_t asid, uint16_t 
> vmid, uint64_t iova,
>                                  uint8_t tg, uint8_t level);
>  void smmu_iotlb_inv_all(SMMUState *s);
>  void smmu_iotlb_inv_asid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t asid);
> +void smmu_iotlb_inv_vmid(SMMUState *s, uint16_t vmid);
>  void smmu_iotlb_inv_iova(SMMUState *s, int asid, int vmid, dma_addr_t iova,
>                           uint8_t tg, uint64_t num_pages, uint8_t ttl);
>  




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]