[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?
From: |
Peter Maydell |
Subject: |
Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense? |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2021 13:20:49 +0000 |
On Thu, 18 Nov 2021 at 13:04, Alistair Francis <alistair23@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 2:10 AM Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> wrote:
> > What kind of device is that OTP exactly? If it is some kind of non-serial
> > flash device, maybe you could simply use IF_PFLASH instead?
>
> It just says "one time programmable memory". I'm guessing it's
> sometype of eFuse.
We used IF_PFLASH for the Xilinx efuse devices we recently added.
So we should probably use that for consistency, unless we want
to instead say that efuses should be something other than IF_PFLASH.
Either way it's a compatibility break for command lines, so we
should probably try to have only one rather than two :-)
-- PMM
- does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Peter Maydell, 2021/11/02
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2021/11/02
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Markus Armbruster, 2021/11/03
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Thomas Huth, 2021/11/03
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Markus Armbruster, 2021/11/12
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Peter Maydell, 2021/11/14
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Markus Armbruster, 2021/11/15
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Alistair Francis, 2021/11/15
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Thomas Huth, 2021/11/15
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Alistair Francis, 2021/11/18
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?,
Peter Maydell <=
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Kevin Wolf, 2021/11/15
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Peter Maydell, 2021/11/15
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Kevin Wolf, 2021/11/15
- Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?, Markus Armbruster, 2021/11/15