[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?

From: Markus Armbruster
Subject: Re: does drive_get_next(IF_NONE) make sense?
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2021 14:33:58 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)

Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com> writes:

> On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> writes:
>>> Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ?
>> Short answer: hell, no!  ;)
> Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get()
> to avoid such mistakes in the future?

Worth a try.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]