[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC PATCH 08/25] hw/cxl/device: Add memory devices (8.2.8.5)
From: |
Jonathan Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC PATCH 08/25] hw/cxl/device: Add memory devices (8.2.8.5) |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Nov 2020 16:37:22 +0000 |
On Tue, 10 Nov 2020 21:47:07 -0800
Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com> wrote:
> Memory devices implement extra capabilities on top of CXL devices. This
> adds support for that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
> ---
> hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h | 15 ++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> index aec8b0d421..6544a68567 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-device-utils.c
> @@ -158,6 +158,45 @@ static void mailbox_reg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
> offset, uint64_t value,
> process_mailbox(cxl_dstate);
> }
>
> +static uint64_t mdev_reg_read(void *opaque, hwaddr offset, unsigned size)
> +{
> + uint64_t retval = 0;
> +
> + retval = FIELD_DP64(retval, CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MEDIA_STATUS, 1);
> + retval = FIELD_DP64(retval, CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MBOX_READY, 1);
> +
> + switch (size) {
> + case 4:
> + if (unlikely(offset & (sizeof(uint32_t) - 1))) {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unaligned register read\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> + break;
> + case 8:
> + if (unlikely(offset & (sizeof(uint64_t) - 1))) {
> + qemu_log_mask(LOG_UNIMP, "Unaligned register read\n");
> + return 0;
> + }
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ldn_le_p(&retval, size);
> +}
> +
> +static const MemoryRegionOps mdev_ops = {
> + .read = mdev_reg_read,
> + .write = NULL,
> + .endianness = DEVICE_LITTLE_ENDIAN,
> + .valid = {
> + .min_access_size = 4,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> + .impl = {
> + .min_access_size = 4,
> + .max_access_size = 8,
> + },
> +};
> +
> static const MemoryRegionOps mailbox_ops = {
> .read = mailbox_reg_read,
> .write = mailbox_reg_write,
> @@ -213,6 +252,9 @@ void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj,
> CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> "device-status", CXL_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->mailbox, obj, &mailbox_ops,
> cxl_dstate,
> "mailbox", CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
> + memory_region_init_io(&cxl_dstate->memory_device, obj, &mdev_ops,
> + cxl_dstate, "memory device caps",
> + CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH);
>
> memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers, 0,
> &cxl_dstate->caps);
> @@ -221,6 +263,9 @@ void cxl_device_register_block_init(Object *obj,
> CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> &cxl_dstate->device);
> memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
> &cxl_dstate->mailbox);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(&cxl_dstate->device_registers,
> + CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET,
> + &cxl_dstate->memory_device);
> }
>
> static void mailbox_init_common(uint32_t *mbox_regs)
> @@ -233,7 +278,7 @@ static void mailbox_init_common(uint32_t *mbox_regs)
> void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> {
> uint32_t *cap_hdrs = cxl_dstate->caps_reg_state32;
> - const int cap_count = 1;
Guessing this should previously have been 2?
> + const int cap_count = 3;
>
> /* CXL Device Capabilities Array Register */
> ARRAY_FIELD_DP32(cap_hdrs, CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY, CAP_ID, 0);
> @@ -242,6 +287,7 @@ void cxl_device_register_init_common(CXLDeviceState
> *cxl_dstate)
>
> cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, DEVICE, 1);
> cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, MAILBOX, 2);
> + cxl_device_cap_init(cxl_dstate, MEMORY_DEVICE, 0x4000);
>
> mailbox_init_common(cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state32);
> }
> diff --git a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> index 2d1b0ef9e4..5d2579800e 100644
> --- a/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> +++ b/hw/cxl/cxl-mailbox-utils.c
> @@ -12,6 +12,12 @@
> #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> #include "hw/cxl/cxl.h"
>
> +enum cxl_opcode {
> + CXL_EVENTS = 0x1,
> + CXL_IDENTIFY = 0x40,
> + #define CXL_IDENTIFY_MEMORY_DEVICE = 0x0
> +};
> +
> /* 8.2.8.4.5.1 Command Return Codes */
> enum {
> RET_SUCCESS = 0x0,
> @@ -40,6 +46,43 @@ enum {
> RET_MAX = 0x17
> };
>
> +/* 8.2.9.5.1.1 */
> +static int cmd_set_identify(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate, uint8_t cmd,
> + uint32_t *ret_size)
I'm a bit confused on naming here, perhaps rsp_set_identity makes
it clearer which direction this is going in? I think this is
filling in the reply for a command from software running on the
system. Naming seems to me to suggest we are setting the identity
of the hardware.
> +{
> + struct identify {
> + char fw_revision[0x10];
> + uint64_t total_capacity;
> + uint64_t volatile_capacity;
> + uint64_t persistent_capacity;
> + uint64_t partition_align;
> + uint16_t info_event_log_size;
> + uint16_t warning_event_log_size;
> + uint16_t failure_event_log_size;
> + uint16_t fatal_event_log_size;
> + uint32_t lsa_size;
> + uint8_t poison_list_max_mer[3];
> + uint16_t inject_poison_limit;
> + uint8_t poison_caps;
> + uint8_t qos_telemetry_caps;
> + } __attribute__((packed)) *id;
> + _Static_assert(sizeof(struct identify) == 0x43, "Bad identify size");
> +
> + if (memory_region_size(cxl_dstate->pmem) < (256 << 20)) {
> + return RET_ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + /* PMEM only */
> + id = (struct identify *)((void *)cxl_dstate->mbox_reg_state +
> + A_CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD);
> + snprintf(id->fw_revision, 0x10, "BWFW VERSION %02d", 0);
> + id->total_capacity = memory_region_size(cxl_dstate->pmem);
> + id->persistent_capacity = memory_region_size(cxl_dstate->pmem);
> +
> + *ret_size = 0x43;
> + return RET_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> void process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
> {
> uint16_t ret = RET_SUCCESS;
> @@ -63,8 +106,11 @@ void process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate)
>
> uint8_t cmd_set = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD,
> COMMAND_SET);
> uint8_t cmd = FIELD_EX64(command_reg, CXL_DEV_MAILBOX_CMD, COMMAND);
> - (void)cmd;
Clean this stuff up before v2.
> switch (cmd_set) {
> + case CXL_IDENTIFY:
> + ret = cmd_set_identify(cxl_dstate, cmd, &ret_len);
> + /* Fill in payload here */
> + break;
> default:
> ret = RET_ENOTSUP;
> }
> diff --git a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> index df00998def..2cb2a9af3c 100644
> --- a/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> +++ b/include/hw/cxl/cxl_device.h
> @@ -69,6 +69,10 @@
> #define CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH \
> (CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_SIZE + CXL_MAILBOX_MAX_PAYLOAD_SIZE)
>
> +#define CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_OFFSET \
> + (CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_OFFSET + CXL_MAILBOX_REGISTERS_LENGTH)
> +#define CXL_MEMORY_DEVICE_REGISTERS_LENGTH 0x8
> +
> typedef struct cxl_device_state {
> /* Boss container and caps registers */
> MemoryRegion device_registers;
> @@ -76,6 +80,7 @@ typedef struct cxl_device_state {
> MemoryRegion caps;
> MemoryRegion device;
> MemoryRegion mailbox;
> + MemoryRegion memory_device;
>
> MemoryRegion *pmem;
> MemoryRegion *vmem;
> @@ -131,6 +136,8 @@ REG32(CXL_DEV_CAP_ARRAY2, 4) /* We're going to pretend
> it's 64b */
> CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(DEVICE, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET)
> CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MAILBOX, CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
> CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE)
> +CXL_DEVICE_CAPABILITY_HEADER_REGISTER(MEMORY_DEVICE,
> CXL_DEVICE_CAP_HDR1_OFFSET + \
> + CXL_DEVICE_CAP_REG_SIZE
> * 2)
>
> void process_mailbox(CXLDeviceState *cxl_dstate);
>
> @@ -181,4 +188,12 @@ REG32(CXL_DEV_BG_CMD_STS, 0x18)
>
> REG32(CXL_DEV_CMD_PAYLOAD, 0x20)
>
> +/* XXX: actually a 64b registers */
> +REG32(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, 0)
> + FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, FATAL, 0, 1)
> + FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, FW_HALT, 1, 1)
> + FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MEDIA_STATUS, 2, 2)
> + FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, MBOX_READY, 4, 1)
> + FIELD(CXL_MEM_DEV_STS, RESET_NEEDED, 5, 3)
> +
> #endif
[RFC PATCH 10/25] hw/pci/cxl: Create a CXL bus type, Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11
[RFC PATCH 11/25] hw/pxb: Allow creation of a CXL PXB (host bridge), Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11
[RFC PATCH 12/25] acpi/pci: Consolidate host bridge setup, Ben Widawsky, 2020/11/11