qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] python/machine.py: split shutdown into hard and sof


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/12] python/machine.py: split shutdown into hard and soft flavors
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2020 14:13:09 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0


On 7/14/20 12:13 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 01:06:47AM -0400, John Snow wrote:
>> This is done primarily to avoid the 'bare except' pattern, which
>> suppresses all exceptions during shutdown and can obscure errors.
>>
>> Replace this with a pattern that isolates the different kind of shutdown
>> paradigms (_hard_shutdown and _soft_shutdown), and a new fallback shutdown
>> handler (_do_shutdown) that gracefully attempts one before the other.
>>
>> This split now also ensures that no matter what happens,
>> _post_shutdown() is always invoked.
>>
>> shutdown() changes in behavior such that if it attempts to do a graceful
>> shutdown and is unable to, it will now always raise an exception to
>> indicate this. This can be avoided by the test writer in three ways:
>>
>> 1. If the VM is expected to have already exited or is in the process of
>> exiting, wait() can be used instead of shutdown() to clean up resources
>> instead. This helps avoid race conditions in shutdown.
>>
>> 2. If a test writer is expecting graceful shutdown to fail, shutdown
>> should be called in a try...except block.
>>
>> 3. If the test writer has no interest in performing a graceful shutdown
>> at all, kill() can be used instead.
>>
>>
>> Handling shutdown in this way makes it much more explicit which type of
>> shutdown we want and allows the library to report problems with this
>> process.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>  python/qemu/machine.py | 95 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 file changed, 80 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/python/qemu/machine.py b/python/qemu/machine.py
>> index aaa173f046..b24ce8a268 100644
>> --- a/python/qemu/machine.py
>> +++ b/python/qemu/machine.py
>> @@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ class QEMUMachineAddDeviceError(QEMUMachineError):
>>      """
>>  
>>  
>> +class AbnormalShutdown(QEMUMachineError):
>> +    """
>> +    Exception raised when a graceful shutdown was requested, but not 
>> performed.
>> +    """
>> +
>> +
>>  class MonitorResponseError(qmp.QMPError):
>>      """
>>      Represents erroneous QMP monitor reply
>> @@ -365,6 +371,7 @@ def _early_cleanup(self) -> None:
>>          """
>>          Perform any cleanup that needs to happen before the VM exits.
>>  
>> +        May be invoked by both soft and hard shutdown in failover scenarios.
>>          Called additionally by _post_shutdown for comprehensive cleanup.
>>          """
>>          # If we keep the console socket open, we may deadlock waiting
>> @@ -374,32 +381,90 @@ def _early_cleanup(self) -> None:
>>              self._console_socket.close()
>>              self._console_socket = None
>>  
>> +    def _hard_shutdown(self) -> None:
>> +        """
>> +        Perform early cleanup, kill the VM, and wait for it to terminate.
>> +
>> +        :raise subprocess.Timeout: When timeout is exceeds 60 seconds
>> +            waiting for the QEMU process to terminate.
>> +        """
>> +        self._early_cleanup()
> 
> Like I commented on patch 5, I don't think the *current* type of
> cleanup done is needed on a scenario like this...
> 
>> +        self._popen.kill()
> 
> ... as I don't remember QEMU's SIGKILL handler to be susceptible to
> the race condition that motivated the closing of the console file in
> the first place.  But, I also can not prove it's not susceptible at
> this time.
> 

It probably isn't. It was for consistency in when and where that hook is
called, again. It does happen to be "pointless" here.

> Note: I have some old patches that added tests for QEMUMachine itself.
> I intend to respin them on top of your work, so we may have a clearer
> understanding of the QEMU behaviors we need to handle.  So, feel free
> to take the prudent route here, and keep the early cleanup.
> 

Oh, adding formal tests to this folder would be incredible; especially
if we wanted to package it on PyPI. Basically a necessity.

> Reviewed-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
> Tested-by: Cleber Rosa <crosa@redhat.com>
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]