Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-net: remove VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO compat handling

[Jason Wang]

On 2020/4/28 下午4:34, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:19:15 +0800
> Jason Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On 2020/4/27 下午6:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO is available in the headers now.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >    hw/net/virtio-net.c | 8 --------
> > >    1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > index e85d902588b3..7449570c7123 100644
> > > --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
> > > @@ -77,14 +77,6 @@
> > >       tso/gso/gro 'off'. */
> > >    #define VIRTIO_NET_RSC_DEFAULT_INTERVAL 300000
> > >    
> > > -/* temporary until standard header include it */
> > > -#if !defined(VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO)
> > > -
> > > -#define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO  4 /* rsc_ext data in csum_ fields */
> > > -#define VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT       61
> > > -
> > > -#endif
> > > -
> > >    static inline __virtio16 *virtio_net_rsc_ext_num_packets(
> > >        struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr)
> > >    {
> >
> > I think we should not keep the those tricky num_packets/dup_acks.
> No real opinion here, patch 3 is only a cleanup.
>
> The important one is patch 1, because without it I cannot do a headers
> update.


Yes, at least we should dereference segments/dup_acks instead of 
csum_start/csum_offsets since the header has been synced.

Thanks


>