qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-net: remove VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO compat hand


From: Jason Wang
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] virtio-net: remove VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO compat handling
Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2020 21:04:57 +0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.7.0


On 2020/4/28 下午6:55, Yuri Benditovich wrote:

On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:18 PM Cornelia Huck <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:

    On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:58:44 +0800
    Jason Wang <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>> wrote:

    > On 2020/4/28 下午4:34, Cornelia Huck wrote:
    > > On Tue, 28 Apr 2020 16:19:15 +0800
    > > Jason Wang <address@hidden <mailto:address@hidden>>
    wrote:
    > >
    > >> On 2020/4/27 下午6:24, Cornelia Huck wrote:
    > >>> VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO is available in the headers now.
    > >>>
    > >>> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <address@hidden
    <mailto:address@hidden>>
    > >>> ---
    > >>>    hw/net/virtio-net.c | 8 --------
    > >>>    1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
    > >>>
    > >>> diff --git a/hw/net/virtio-net.c b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
    > >>> index e85d902588b3..7449570c7123 100644
    > >>> --- a/hw/net/virtio-net.c
    > >>> +++ b/hw/net/virtio-net.c
    > >>> @@ -77,14 +77,6 @@
    > >>>       tso/gso/gro 'off'. */
    > >>>    #define VIRTIO_NET_RSC_DEFAULT_INTERVAL 300000
    > >>>
    > >>> -/* temporary until standard header include it */
    > >>> -#if !defined(VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO)
    > >>> -
    > >>> -#define VIRTIO_NET_HDR_F_RSC_INFO  4 /* rsc_ext data in
    csum_ fields */
    > >>> -#define VIRTIO_NET_F_RSC_EXT       61
    > >>> -
    > >>> -#endif
    > >>> -
    > >>>    static inline __virtio16 *virtio_net_rsc_ext_num_packets(
    > >>>        struct virtio_net_hdr *hdr)
    > >>>    {
    > >>
    > >> I think we should not keep the those tricky
    num_packets/dup_acks.
    > > No real opinion here, patch 3 is only a cleanup.
    > >
    > > The important one is patch 1, because without it I cannot do a
    headers
    > > update.
    >
    >
    > Yes, at least we should dereference segments/dup_acks instead of
    > csum_start/csum_offsets since the header has been synced.

    So what about:

    - I merge patch 1 and the header sync now (because I have a bunch of
      patches that depend on it...)
    - We change virtio-net to handle that properly on top (probably best
      done by someone familiar with the code base ;)


Jason,
This series just solves the conflict caused by the update of Linux headers. After this series is applied I can submit further patch to use actual RSC definitions from linux headers.

Thanks,
Yuri


Yes, please.

Thanks





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]