[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty
From: |
Yan Zhao |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking. |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2020 20:51:13 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 12:57:30AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>
>
> On 3/19/2020 6:36 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 02:15:34 -0400
> > Yan Zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:40:53PM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:15:33 -0400
> >>> Yan Zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:01:00PM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:06:39 -0400
> >>>>> Yan Zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:41:11AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >>>>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES ioctl performs three operations:
> >>>>>>> - Start dirty pages tracking while migration is active
> >>>>>>> - Stop dirty pages tracking.
> >>>>>>> - Get dirty pages bitmap. Its user space application's responsibility
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> copy content of dirty pages from source to destination during
> >>>>>>> migration.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> To prevent DoS attack, memory for bitmap is allocated per vfio_dma
> >>>>>>> structure. Bitmap size is calculated considering smallest supported
> >>>>>>> page
> >>>>>>> size. Bitmap is allocated for all vfio_dmas when dirty logging is
> >>>>>>> enabled
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Bitmap is populated for already pinned pages when bitmap is allocated
> >>>>>>> for
> >>>>>>> a vfio_dma with the smallest supported page size. Update bitmap from
> >>>>>>> pinning functions when tracking is enabled. When user application
> >>>>>>> queries
> >>>>>>> bitmap, check if requested page size is same as page size used to
> >>>>>>> populated bitmap. If it is equal, copy bitmap, but if not equal,
> >>>>>>> return
> >>>>>>> error.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden>
> >>>>>>> Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <address@hidden>
> >>>>>>> ---
> >>>>>>> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 205
> >>>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>>>>>> 1 file changed, 203 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >>>>>>> b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >>>>>>> index 70aeab921d0f..d6417fb02174 100644
> >>>>>>> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> >>>>>>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
> >>>>>>> unsigned int dma_avail;
> >>>>>>> bool v2;
> >>>>>>> bool nesting;
> >>>>>>> + bool dirty_page_tracking;
> >>>>>>> };
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> struct vfio_domain {
> >>>>>>> @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ struct vfio_dma {
> >>>>>>> bool lock_cap; /*
> >>>>>>> capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) */
> >>>>>>> struct task_struct *task;
> >>>>>>> struct rb_root pfn_list; /* Ex-user pinned pfn
> >>>>>>> list */
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long *bitmap;
> >>>>>>> };
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> struct vfio_group {
> >>>>>>> @@ -125,7 +127,10 @@ struct vfio_regions {
> >>>>>>> #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n) (ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) /
> >>>>>>> BITS_PER_BYTE)
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
> >>>>>>> +static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> /*
> >>>>>>> * This code handles mapping and unmapping of user data buffers
> >>>>>>> @@ -175,6 +180,55 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu
> >>>>>>> *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
> >>>>>>> rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, uint64_t
> >>>>>>> pgsize)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma,
> >>>>>>> node);
> >>>>>>> + struct rb_node *p;
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long npages = dma->size / pgsize;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages),
> >>>>>>> GFP_KERNEL);
> >>>>>>> + if (!dma->bitmap) {
> >>>>>>> + struct rb_node *p = rb_prev(n);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (; p; p = rb_prev(p)) {
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n,
> >>>>>>> + struct
> >>>>>>> vfio_dma, node);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + kfree(dma->bitmap);
> >>>>>>> + dma->bitmap = NULL;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + return -ENOMEM;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list))
> >>>>>>> + continue;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list); p; p = rb_next(p)) {
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = rb_entry(p, struct
> >>>>>>> vfio_pfn,
> >>>>>>> + node);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap,
> >>>>>>> + (vpfn->iova - dma->iova) /
> >>>>>>> pgsize, 1);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static void vfio_dma_bitmap_free(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma,
> >>>>>>> node);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + kfree(dma->bitmap);
> >>>>>>> + dma->bitmap = NULL;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> /*
> >>>>>>> * Helper Functions for host iova-pfn list
> >>>>>>> */
> >>>>>>> @@ -567,6 +621,14 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void
> >>>>>>> *iommu_data,
> >>>>>>> vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova,
> >>>>>>> do_accounting);
> >>>>>>> goto pin_unwind;
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long pgshift =
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap,
> >>>>>>> + (vpfn->iova - dma->iova) >> pgshift,
> >>>>>>> 1);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ret = i;
> >>>>>>> @@ -801,6 +863,7 @@ static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu
> >>>>>>> *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> >>>>>>> vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, true);
> >>>>>>> vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
> >>>>>>> put_task_struct(dma->task);
> >>>>>>> + kfree(dma->bitmap);
> >>>>>>> kfree(dma);
> >>>>>>> iommu->dma_avail++;
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>> @@ -831,6 +894,50 @@ static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct
> >>>>>>> vfio_iommu *iommu)
> >>>>>>> return bitmap;
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> +static int vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >>>>>>> dma_addr_t iova,
> >>>>>>> + size_t size, uint64_t pgsize,
> >>>>>>> + unsigned char __user *bitmap)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(pgsize);
> >>>>>>> + unsigned int npages, bitmap_size;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 1);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (!dma)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (dma->iova != iova || dma->size != size)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>> looks this size is passed from user. how can it ensure size always
> >>>>>> equals to dma->size ?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> shouldn't we iterate dma tree to look for dirty for whole range if a
> >>>>>> single dma cannot meet them all?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please see the discussion on v12[1], the problem is with the alignment
> >>>>> of DMA mapped regions versus the bitmap. A DMA mapping only requires
> >>>>> page alignment, so for example imagine a user requests the bitmap from
> >>>>> page zero to 4GB, but we have a DMA mapping starting at 4KB. We can't
> >>>>> efficiently copy the bitmap tracked by the vfio_dma structure to the
> >>>>> user buffer when it's shifted by 1 bit. Adjacent mappings can also
> >>>>> make for a very complicated implementation. In the discussion linked
> >>>>> we decided to compromise on a more simple implementation that requires
> >>>>> the user to ask for a bitmap which exactly matches a single DMA
> >>>>> mapping, which Kirti indicates is what we require to support QEMU.
> >>>>> Later in the series, the unmap operation also makes this requirement
> >>>>> when used with the flags to retrieve the dirty bitmap. Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> so, what about for vIOMMU enabling case?
> >>>> if IOVAs are mapped per page, then there's a log_sync in qemu,
> >>>> it's supposed for range from 0-U64MAX, qemu has to find out which
> >>>> ones are mapped and cut them into pages before calling this IOCTL?
> >>>> And what if those IOVAs are mapped for len more than one page?
> >>>
> >>> Good question. Kirti?
> >>>
>
> In log_sync with vIOMMU, loop for range such that:
>
> - find iotlb entry for iova, get iova_xlat
> - size = iotlb.addr_mask + 1; This is same caculation as when mapping
> are created from vfio_iommu_map_notify()
> - use the <iova_xlat, size> for VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES ioctl
> - increment iova: iova += size
> - iterate above steps till end of range.
>
Ok. It makes sense, though not efficient :)
think about when there's no iotlb found for an iova, page by page
incremental of iova is required. right?
> >>>>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/address@hidden/
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>> + npages = dma->size >> pgshift;
> >>>>>>> + bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and mapped. */
> >>>>>>> + if (dma->iommu_mapped)
> >>>>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, npages);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap, dma->bitmap,
> >>>>>>> bitmap_size))
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> +
> >> Here, dma->bitmap needs to be cleared. right?
> >
> > Ah, I missed re-checking this in my review. v13 did clear it, but I
> > noted that we need to re-populate any currently pinned pages. This
> > neither clears nor repopulates. That's wrong. Thanks,
> >
>
> Why re-populate when there will be no change since
> vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap() is called holding iommu->lock? If there is any
> pin request while vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap() is still working, it will
> wait till iommu->lock is released. Bitmap will be populated when page is
> pinned.
>
> Thanks,
> Kirti
>
> > Alex
> >
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> +static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
> >>>>>>> +{
> >>>>>>> + uint64_t bsize;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (!npages || !bitmap_size || bitmap_size > UINT_MAX)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + bsize = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (bitmap_size < bsize)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> +}
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >>>>>>> struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
> >>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>> @@ -2278,6 +2385,93 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void
> >>>>>>> *iommu_data,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &unmap, minsz) ?
> >>>>>>> -EFAULT : 0;
> >>>>>>> + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES) {
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap dirty;
> >>>>>>> + uint32_t mask = VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START |
> >>>>>>> + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_STOP |
> >>>>>>> + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_GET_BITMAP;
> >>>>>>> + int ret = 0;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (!iommu->v2)
> >>>>>>> + return -EACCES;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + minsz = offsetofend(struct
> >>>>>>> vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap,
> >>>>>>> + flags);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (copy_from_user(&dirty, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (dirty.argsz < minsz || dirty.flags & ~mask)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* only one flag should be set at a time */
> >>>>>>> + if (__ffs(dirty.flags) != __fls(dirty.flags))
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (dirty.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START) {
> >>>>>>> + uint64_t pgsize = 1 <<
> >>>>>>> __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> >>>>>>> + if (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> >>>>>>> + ret = vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(iommu,
> >>>>>>> pgsize);
> >>>>>>> + if (!ret)
> >>>>>>> + iommu->dirty_page_tracking =
> >>>>>>> true;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> >>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>> + } else if (dirty.flags &
> >>>>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_STOP) {
> >>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> >>>>>>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> >>>>>>> + iommu->dirty_page_tracking = false;
> >>>>>>> + vfio_dma_bitmap_free(iommu);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> >>>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>>> + } else if (dirty.flags &
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_GET_BITMAP) {
> >>>>>>> + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get range;
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long pgshift;
> >>>>>>> + size_t data_size = dirty.argsz - minsz;
> >>>>>>> + uint64_t iommu_pgsize =
> >>>>>>> + 1 <<
> >>>>>>> __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (!data_size || data_size < sizeof(range))
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + if (copy_from_user(&range, (void __user *)(arg
> >>>>>>> + minsz),
> >>>>>>> + sizeof(range)))
> >>>>>>> + return -EFAULT;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + /* allow only min supported pgsize */
> >>>>>>> + if (range.bitmap.pgsize != iommu_pgsize)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> + if (range.iova & (iommu_pgsize - 1))
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> + if (!range.size || range.size & (iommu_pgsize -
> >>>>>>> 1))
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> + if (range.iova + range.size < range.iova)
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> + if (!access_ok((void __user *)range.bitmap.data,
> >>>>>>> + range.bitmap.size))
> >>>>>>> + return -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + pgshift = __ffs(range.bitmap.pgsize);
> >>>>>>> + ret = verify_bitmap_size(range.size >> pgshift,
> >>>>>>> + range.bitmap.size);
> >>>>>>> + if (ret)
> >>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> >>>>>>> + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
> >>>>>>> + ret = vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(iommu,
> >>>>>>> range.iova,
> >>>>>>> + range.size,
> >>>>>>> range.bitmap.pgsize,
> >>>>>>> + (unsigned char __user
> >>>>>>> *)range.bitmap.data);
> >>>>>>> + else
> >>>>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
> >>>>>>> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + return ret;
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> return -ENOTTY;
> >>>>>>> @@ -2345,10 +2539,17 @@ static int
> >>>>>>> vfio_iommu_type1_dma_rw_chunk(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> vaddr = dma->vaddr + offset;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> - if (write)
> >>>>>>> + if (write) {
> >>>>>>> *copied = __copy_to_user((void __user *)vaddr, data,
> >>>>>>> count) ? 0 : count;
> >>>>>>> - else
> >>>>>>> + if (*copied && iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> >>>>>>> + unsigned long pgshift =
> >>>>>>> + __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> >>>>>>> +
> >>>>>>> + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, offset >> pgshift,
> >>>>>>> + *copied >> pgshift);
> >>>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>> + } else
> >>>>>>> *copied = __copy_from_user(data, (void __user *)vaddr,
> >>>>>>> count) ? 0 : count;
> >>>>>>> if (kthread)
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>> 2.7.0
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
> >
- [PATCH v14 Kernel 3/7] vfio iommu: Add ioctl definition for dirty pages tracking., (continued)
- [PATCH v14 Kernel 3/7] vfio iommu: Add ioctl definition for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/18
- [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Yan Zhao, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Yan Zhao, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Yan Zhao, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking.,
Yan Zhao <=
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/18
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/19
[PATCH v14 Kernel 5/7] vfio iommu: Update UNMAP_DMA ioctl to get dirty bitmap before unmap, Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/18