[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty
From: |
Yan Zhao |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking. |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Mar 2020 00:15:33 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) |
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 12:01:00PM +0800, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 23:06:39 -0400
> Yan Zhao <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 03:41:11AM +0800, Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> > > VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES ioctl performs three operations:
> > > - Start dirty pages tracking while migration is active
> > > - Stop dirty pages tracking.
> > > - Get dirty pages bitmap. Its user space application's responsibility to
> > > copy content of dirty pages from source to destination during migration.
> > >
> > > To prevent DoS attack, memory for bitmap is allocated per vfio_dma
> > > structure. Bitmap size is calculated considering smallest supported page
> > > size. Bitmap is allocated for all vfio_dmas when dirty logging is enabled
> > >
> > > Bitmap is populated for already pinned pages when bitmap is allocated for
> > > a vfio_dma with the smallest supported page size. Update bitmap from
> > > pinning functions when tracking is enabled. When user application queries
> > > bitmap, check if requested page size is same as page size used to
> > > populated bitmap. If it is equal, copy bitmap, but if not equal, return
> > > error.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kirti Wankhede <address@hidden>
> > > Reviewed-by: Neo Jia <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 205
> > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 203 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > index 70aeab921d0f..d6417fb02174 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> > > @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
> > > unsigned int dma_avail;
> > > bool v2;
> > > bool nesting;
> > > + bool dirty_page_tracking;
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct vfio_domain {
> > > @@ -91,6 +92,7 @@ struct vfio_dma {
> > > bool lock_cap; /* capable(CAP_IPC_LOCK) */
> > > struct task_struct *task;
> > > struct rb_root pfn_list; /* Ex-user pinned pfn list */
> > > + unsigned long *bitmap;
> > > };
> > >
> > > struct vfio_group {
> > > @@ -125,7 +127,10 @@ struct vfio_regions {
> > > #define IS_IOMMU_CAP_DOMAIN_IN_CONTAINER(iommu) \
> > > (!list_empty(&iommu->domain_list))
> > >
> > > +#define DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(n) (ALIGN(n, BITS_PER_TYPE(u64)) /
> > > BITS_PER_BYTE)
> > > +
> > > static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
> > > +static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * This code handles mapping and unmapping of user data buffers
> > > @@ -175,6 +180,55 @@ static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu
> > > *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
> > > rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, uint64_t
> > > pgsize)
> > > +{
> > > + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> > > +
> > > + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> > > + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> > > + struct rb_node *p;
> > > + unsigned long npages = dma->size / pgsize;
> > > +
> > > + dma->bitmap = kvzalloc(DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!dma->bitmap) {
> > > + struct rb_node *p = rb_prev(n);
> > > +
> > > + for (; p; p = rb_prev(p)) {
> > > + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n,
> > > + struct vfio_dma, node);
> > > +
> > > + kfree(dma->bitmap);
> > > + dma->bitmap = NULL;
> > > + }
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + if (RB_EMPTY_ROOT(&dma->pfn_list))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + for (p = rb_first(&dma->pfn_list); p; p = rb_next(p)) {
> > > + struct vfio_pfn *vpfn = rb_entry(p, struct vfio_pfn,
> > > + node);
> > > +
> > > + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap,
> > > + (vpfn->iova - dma->iova) / pgsize, 1);
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void vfio_dma_bitmap_free(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> > > +{
> > > + struct rb_node *n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> > > +
> > > + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> > > + struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> > > +
> > > + kfree(dma->bitmap);
> > > + dma->bitmap = NULL;
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * Helper Functions for host iova-pfn list
> > > */
> > > @@ -567,6 +621,14 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_pin_pages(void
> > > *iommu_data,
> > > vfio_unpin_page_external(dma, iova, do_accounting);
> > > goto pin_unwind;
> > > }
> > > +
> > > + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> > > + unsigned long pgshift =
> > > + __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> > > +
> > > + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap,
> > > + (vpfn->iova - dma->iova) >> pgshift, 1);
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > ret = i;
> > > @@ -801,6 +863,7 @@ static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > > struct vfio_dma *dma)
> > > vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, true);
> > > vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
> > > put_task_struct(dma->task);
> > > + kfree(dma->bitmap);
> > > kfree(dma);
> > > iommu->dma_avail++;
> > > }
> > > @@ -831,6 +894,50 @@ static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct
> > > vfio_iommu *iommu)
> > > return bitmap;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t
> > > iova,
> > > + size_t size, uint64_t pgsize,
> > > + unsigned char __user *bitmap)
> > > +{
> > > + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> > > + unsigned long pgshift = __ffs(pgsize);
> > > + unsigned int npages, bitmap_size;
> > > +
> > > + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, 1);
> > > +
> > > + if (!dma)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (dma->iova != iova || dma->size != size)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > looks this size is passed from user. how can it ensure size always
> > equals to dma->size ?
> >
> > shouldn't we iterate dma tree to look for dirty for whole range if a
> > single dma cannot meet them all?
>
> Please see the discussion on v12[1], the problem is with the alignment
> of DMA mapped regions versus the bitmap. A DMA mapping only requires
> page alignment, so for example imagine a user requests the bitmap from
> page zero to 4GB, but we have a DMA mapping starting at 4KB. We can't
> efficiently copy the bitmap tracked by the vfio_dma structure to the
> user buffer when it's shifted by 1 bit. Adjacent mappings can also
> make for a very complicated implementation. In the discussion linked
> we decided to compromise on a more simple implementation that requires
> the user to ask for a bitmap which exactly matches a single DMA
> mapping, which Kirti indicates is what we require to support QEMU.
> Later in the series, the unmap operation also makes this requirement
> when used with the flags to retrieve the dirty bitmap. Thanks,
>
so, what about for vIOMMU enabling case?
if IOVAs are mapped per page, then there's a log_sync in qemu,
it's supposed for range from 0-U64MAX, qemu has to find out which
ones are mapped and cut them into pages before calling this IOCTL?
And what if those IOVAs are mapped for len more than one page?
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/address@hidden/
>
> > > + npages = dma->size >> pgshift;
> > > + bitmap_size = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages);
> > > +
> > > + /* mark all pages dirty if all pages are pinned and mapped. */
> > > + if (dma->iommu_mapped)
> > > + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, 0, npages);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_to_user((void __user *)bitmap, dma->bitmap, bitmap_size))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int verify_bitmap_size(uint64_t npages, uint64_t bitmap_size)
> > > +{
> > > + uint64_t bsize;
> > > +
> > > + if (!npages || !bitmap_size || bitmap_size > UINT_MAX)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + bsize = DIRTY_BITMAP_BYTES(npages);
> > > +
> > > + if (bitmap_size < bsize)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > > struct vfio_iommu_type1_dma_unmap *unmap)
> > > {
> > > @@ -2278,6 +2385,93 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void
> > > *iommu_data,
> > >
> > > return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &unmap, minsz) ?
> > > -EFAULT : 0;
> > > + } else if (cmd == VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES) {
> > > + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap dirty;
> > > + uint32_t mask = VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START |
> > > + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_STOP |
> > > + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_GET_BITMAP;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> > > +
> > > + if (!iommu->v2)
> > > + return -EACCES;
> > > +
> > > + minsz = offsetofend(struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap,
> > > + flags);
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&dirty, (void __user *)arg, minsz))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + if (dirty.argsz < minsz || dirty.flags & ~mask)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + /* only one flag should be set at a time */
> > > + if (__ffs(dirty.flags) != __fls(dirty.flags))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (dirty.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_START) {
> > > + uint64_t pgsize = 1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > > + if (!iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> > > + ret = vfio_dma_bitmap_alloc(iommu, pgsize);
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + iommu->dirty_page_tracking = true;
> > > + }
> > > + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > > + return ret;
> > > + } else if (dirty.flags & VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_STOP) {
> > > + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > > + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> > > + iommu->dirty_page_tracking = false;
> > > + vfio_dma_bitmap_free(iommu);
> > > + }
> > > + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > > + return 0;
> > > + } else if (dirty.flags &
> > > + VFIO_IOMMU_DIRTY_PAGES_FLAG_GET_BITMAP) {
> > > + struct vfio_iommu_type1_dirty_bitmap_get range;
> > > + unsigned long pgshift;
> > > + size_t data_size = dirty.argsz - minsz;
> > > + uint64_t iommu_pgsize =
> > > + 1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> > > +
> > > + if (!data_size || data_size < sizeof(range))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + if (copy_from_user(&range, (void __user *)(arg + minsz),
> > > + sizeof(range)))
> > > + return -EFAULT;
> > > +
> > > + /* allow only min supported pgsize */
> > > + if (range.bitmap.pgsize != iommu_pgsize)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (range.iova & (iommu_pgsize - 1))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!range.size || range.size & (iommu_pgsize - 1))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (range.iova + range.size < range.iova)
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > + if (!access_ok((void __user *)range.bitmap.data,
> > > + range.bitmap.size))
> > > + return -EINVAL;
> > > +
> > > + pgshift = __ffs(range.bitmap.pgsize);
> > > + ret = verify_bitmap_size(range.size >> pgshift,
> > > + range.bitmap.size);
> > > + if (ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> > > + if (iommu->dirty_page_tracking)
> > > + ret = vfio_iova_dirty_bitmap(iommu, range.iova,
> > > + range.size, range.bitmap.pgsize,
> > > + (unsigned char __user *)range.bitmap.data);
> > > + else
> > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> > > +
> > > + return ret;
> > > + }
> > > }
> > >
> > > return -ENOTTY;
> > > @@ -2345,10 +2539,17 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_dma_rw_chunk(struct
> > > vfio_iommu *iommu,
> > >
> > > vaddr = dma->vaddr + offset;
> > >
> > > - if (write)
> > > + if (write) {
> > > *copied = __copy_to_user((void __user *)vaddr, data,
> > > count) ? 0 : count;
> > > - else
> > > + if (*copied && iommu->dirty_page_tracking) {
> > > + unsigned long pgshift =
> > > + __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu));
> > > +
> > > + bitmap_set(dma->bitmap, offset >> pgshift,
> > > + *copied >> pgshift);
> > > + }
> > > + } else
> > > *copied = __copy_from_user(data, (void __user *)vaddr,
> > > count) ? 0 : count;
> > > if (kthread)
> > > --
> > > 2.7.0
> > >
> >
>
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 1/7] vfio: KABI for migration interface for device state, (continued)
[PATCH v14 Kernel 2/7] vfio iommu: Remove atomicity of ref_count of pinned pages, Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/18
[PATCH v14 Kernel 3/7] vfio iommu: Add ioctl definition for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/18
[PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Yan Zhao, 2020/03/18
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking.,
Yan Zhao <=
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Yan Zhao, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Kirti Wankhede, 2020/03/19
- Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Yan Zhao, 2020/03/19
Re: [PATCH v14 Kernel 4/7] vfio iommu: Implementation of ioctl for dirty pages tracking., Alex Williamson, 2020/03/18