[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix more GCC9 -O3 warnings
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/6] Fix more GCC9 -O3 warnings |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2020 11:49:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.1 |
On 20/01/20 20:02, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> On 1/18/20 8:24 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 18/12/19 07:05, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> "Chubb, Peter (Data61, Kensington NSW)" <address@hidden>
>>> writes:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Philippe" == Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> writes:
>>>>
>>>> Philippe> Fix some trivial warnings when building with -O3.
>>>>
>>>> For compatibility with lint and other older checkers, it'd be good
>>>> to keep
>>>> this as /* FALLTHROUGH */ (which gcc should accept according to its
>>>> manual).
>>>
>>> We have hundreds of /* fall through */ comments already.
>>>
>>>> Fixing the comments' placement is a different matter, and should be
>>>> done. Seems to me that until gcc started warning for this, noone had
>>>> actually run a checker, and the comments were just for human info.
>>>>
>>>> Peter C
>>>
>>
>> Queued, thanks.
>
> Thanks, but I sent a v2 (address@hidden) with:
>
> - addressed Thomas and Aleksandar comments
> - dropped 'hw/scsi/megasas: Silent GCC9 duplicated-cond warning'
> - dropped 'qemu-io-cmds: Silent GCC9 format-overflow warning'
>
> See:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/address@hidden/msg666280.html
>
> Can you queue it instead?
Yes, I replaced it.
Paolo