[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2016 09:37:38 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) |
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:16:48PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 29.09.2016 um 02:16 schrieb David Gibson:
> > is there really any value to supporting the "class"
> > properties in addition to the "instance" properties?
>
> Yes, it makes enumerating available properties easier by not requiring
> to instantiate a new instance for printing, e.g., ",help"
> information.
A good point. I shall try to be on the lookup for opportunities to
change existing properties to class properties.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?, Andreas Färber, 2016/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?,
David Gibson <=