Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?

[Paolo Bonzini]

On 29/09/2016 02:16, David Gibson wrote:
> Alternatively, if we *don't* want to remove class properties, should
> we instead be trying to convert the many, many "instance" properties
> whose existence is actually per-class to be class properties?

Yes, this was the point of introducing them. :)

Paolo

> David Gibson (4):
>   qcrypto: Remove usage of class properties
>   s390: Don't use class properties
>   tests: Remove tests for class properties
>   qom: Abolish class properties
> 
>  crypto/secret.c            |  58 +++++++-------
>  crypto/tlscreds.c          |  44 +++++-----
>  crypto/tlscredsanon.c      |  16 ++--
>  crypto/tlscredsx509.c      |  26 +++---
>  include/qom/object.h       |  42 ----------
>  qom/object.c               | 195 
> ---------------------------------------------
>  target-s390x/cpu.c         |   1 -
>  target-s390x/cpu_models.c  |  47 +++++------
>  tests/check-qom-proplist.c |  30 +++----
>  9 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 353 deletions(-)
>