[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?
|
From: |
Andreas Färber |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 29 Sep 2016 12:23:41 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 |
Am 29.09.2016 um 12:21 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 12:12:32PM +0200, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 29.09.2016 um 10:14 schrieb Daniel P. Berrange:
>>> Practically all instances properties should become class properties
>>> as its going to save wasting memory once most are converted.
>>
>> Not all, but most. child<> properties were the reason to have properties
>> on the instance.
>
> That's why I said "Practically all", instead of just "all" :-)
To me as non-native speaker "practically" is the opposite of
"theoretically". :)
Cheers,
Andreas
--
SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?, David Gibson, 2016/09/28
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 1/4] qcrypto: Remove usage of class properties, David Gibson, 2016/09/28
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 3/4] tests: Remove tests for class properties, David Gibson, 2016/09/28
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 2/4] s390: Don't use class properties, David Gibson, 2016/09/28
- [Qemu-devel] [RFC 4/4] qom: Abolish class properties, David Gibson, 2016/09/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?, Paolo Bonzini, 2016/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?, Daniel P. Berrange, 2016/09/29
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?, David Gibson, 2016/09/29
Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC 0/4] QOM class properties - do we need them?, Andreas Färber, 2016/09/29