qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL V4 00/31] Net patches


From: Dmitry Fleytman
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL V4 00/31] Net patches
Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2016 21:09:27 +0300

> On 2 Jun 2016, at 19:29 PM, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> On 2 June 2016 at 15:15, Peter Maydell <address@hidden> wrote:
>> On 2 June 2016 at 07:47, Jason Wang <address@hidden> wrote:
>>> The following changes since commit 287db79df8af8e31f18e262feb5e05103a09e4d4:
>>> 
>>>  Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/ehabkost/tags/x86-pull-request' into 
>>> staging (2016-05-24 13:06:33 +0100)
>>> 
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>> 
>>>  https://github.com/jasowang/qemu.git tags/net-pull-request
>>> 
>>> for you to fetch changes up to 517b5e9a175fe7d47cc0fab6c2310241fd33c115:
>>> 
>>>  Add ENET device to i.MX6 SOC. (2016-06-02 10:42:46 +0800)
>>> 
>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Main changes:
>>> - e1000e emulation
>>> - convet vmxnet3 to use DMA api
>>> - ENET support for FEC device
>>> Changes from V3:
>>> - add ENET series
>>> - fix clang sanitizer about misaligned access
>>> Changes from V2:
>>> - fix clang build
>>> Changes from V1:
>>> - fix 32bit build
>>> 
>> 
>> Applied, thanks.
> 
> Looks like this caused a travis build failure for the config which
> uses --enable-trace-backends=ust:
> https://travis-ci.org/qemu/qemu/jobs/134759359
> 
> Could you or Dmitry have a look, please?

Hi Peter,

The build did not pass because of tracepoint e1000e_rx_rss_ip6 which failed to 
compile.

This tracepoint has 11 parameters, when 1 parameter is removed build succeeds.
Could it be that ust backend has a limitation of 10 parameters per event?
Should I split this trace into 2 events?

In general, I would like to check compilability of my patches better next time,
is there a way to figure out a full list of configurations to be tested? Is 
there a tool for that maybe?

Thanks,
Dmitry

> 
> thanks
> -- PMM




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]