[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] Xen PV Device

From: Andreas Färber
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] Xen PV Device
Date: Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:02:48 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7

Am 08.07.2013 17:34, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 8 July 2013 16:20, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Right, it goes:
>> 1) Acked-by:
>> I haven't reviewed the code in detail but the general idea seems sane.
>> 2) Reviewed-by:
>> The general idea seems sane, and I have done a thorough review of the
>> patch in question.
>> 3) Signed-off-by:
>> All of the above, plus I have ensured that the code is of good quality,
>> does not break things, and the other things expected of a maintainer.
>> This is considered to be a legally binding statement too based on the
>> DCO so be aware of that and ensure you have the right approval to make
>> such a statement.
> I agree with this and it matches my idea of what the semantics are.

Matches my understanding, too.


SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]