Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5] Xen PV Device

[Peter Maydell]

On 8 July 2013 16:20, Anthony Liguori <address@hidden> wrote:
> Right, it goes:
>
> 1) Acked-by:
>
> I haven't reviewed the code in detail but the general idea seems sane.
>
> 2) Reviewed-by:
>
> The general idea seems sane, and I have done a thorough review of the
> patch in question.
>
> 3) Signed-off-by:
>
> All of the above, plus I have ensured that the code is of good quality,
> does not break things, and the other things expected of a maintainer.
> This is considered to be a legally binding statement too based on the
> DCO so be aware of that and ensure you have the right approval to make
> such a statement.

I agree with this and it matches my idea of what the semantics are.

-- PMM