qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4] block/vpc: Fix size calculation


From: Stefan Weil
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4] block/vpc: Fix size calculation
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:49:16 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2

Am 12.02.2013 12:24, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 10:12:59AM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>>> Il 12/02/2013 09:42, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
>>>>>> No, it wasn't.  The patch was reviewed and tested.  What's the problem.
>>>>>> It's proposed for 1.4 so it's now or never.
>>>> The problem is that the test failed. Why do we even test things if we
>>>> commit anyway when the test fails?
>>>>
>>>> And why do we have subsystem trees when a committer comes (without even
>>>> having taken part in the discussion) and applies patches that the
>>>> subsystem maintainers are very obviously not happy with? If you like,
>>>> you can have the block subsystem back, just send - or better just apply
>>>> - a patch against MAINTAINERS.
>>>>
>>> I think this is just a problem with the new tools, that didn't make it
>>> clear that you were not happy with the patch.  (It was clear from the
>>> mailing list).
>>>
>>> In general, the new tools sound like an improvement, but it's normal to
>>> have a misunderstanding or two in the initial period.
>> Yup.  No need to get excited.
>>
>> Let's revert this patch for 1.4, keeping QEMU exactly as working and as
>> broken as it has always been.  Then figure out which additional cases we
>> can make work for 1.5, and which ones we have to break for that, if any.
> I'll send a block pull request that includes a revert.
>
> Stefan


I'm not convinced that this would be a good idea.
See my other mail for the reason.

Stefan




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]