qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4] block/vpc: Fix size calculation


From: Kevin Wolf
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4] block/vpc: Fix size calculation
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:42:27 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0

Am 11.02.2013 22:14, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Il 11/02/2013 21:13, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>>> Applied.  Thanks.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Anthony Liguori
>>
>> I guess this was a mistake, please revert.
> 
> No, it wasn't.  The patch was reviewed and tested.  What's the problem.
> It's proposed for 1.4 so it's now or never.

The problem is that the test failed. Why do we even test things if we
commit anyway when the test fails?

And why do we have subsystem trees when a committer comes (without even
having taken part in the discussion) and applies patches that the
subsystem maintainers are very obviously not happy with? If you like,
you can have the block subsystem back, just send - or better just apply
- a patch against MAINTAINERS.

> I saw some discussion about improving the detection for the different
> varients of VHD...
> 
> I don't mind reverting it, but just want to understand what the issue
> is.

It makes qemu use the wrong size for VHD images created by Virtual PC
that used to work with qemu. This is a regression that can result in
images appearing corrupted in Virtual PC, and we need very good
justification to apply such a patch.

At the same time the patch enables the use of the correct size for
Hyper-V images, but that has never worked with qemu, so if we can't get
it to work with both for 1.4, I'd rather compromise on this one and not
apply the patch.

Please revert.

Kevin



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]