paparazzi-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Continous Integration Server


From: Felix Ruess
Subject: Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Continous Integration Server
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 00:16:09 +0100

Hi Gareth,

nice...
You can use https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Github+Plugin
to automatically trigger on a push to github.
Could you please install paparazzi-arm-multilib instead of
paparazzi-arm7 and paparazzi-stm32 since this is the recommended
toolchain now and the other packages won't be maintained anymore.
Also maybe it would make more sense to send messages to
paparazzi-commits instead, since that won't interest a lot of people?

Cheers, Felix

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Gareth Roberts
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I've set up a Jenkins CI server for paparazzi as an experiment to see if
> it's useful for anyone.
> If any of the devs would like access to the server (ssh + jenkins admin
> details) please let me know.
>
> You can get to it via
> http://uavs.mace.manchester.ac.uk/ppz-ci.html (Amazon changes the DNS on
> reboots, I'll try to keep this up to date)
>
> The server checks currently just master from github every 5 minutes for
> changes.
>
> It runs:
> make clean &&
> make &&
> make AIRCRAFT=Microjet sim &&
> make AIRCRAFT=Microjet ap &&
> make AIRCRAFT=LISA_ASCTEC_PIOTR ap
>
> I've chosen Microjet because it's the first on the list in paparazzi centre.
> I've not aware of a 'canonical' Lisa-based airframe, so that I picked the
> ASCTEC one because it was the last one on the list and therefore maybe the
> newest(?).
>
> If the build fails, it should ping paparazzi-dev (this list).
> It will ping on first fail, and on fix.
>
> The server runs on an Debian squeeze AWS micro instance (ubuntu on AMI micro
> has a kernel bug triggered by Java).  It takes around 4 minutes to complete
> a build & has two build workers.  It has paparazzi-dev, paparazzi-arm7 &
> paparazzi-stm32 installed.
> I can also set up a job which doesn't do the make clean step if people think
> this would be useful.
>
> If anyone has any comments or any additional airframes or targets that could
> be tested please let me know.
>
> Many thanks,
> Gareth R
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]