[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim
From: |
Reto Büttner |
Subject: |
Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Oct 2011 11:27:38 +0200 |
Hi David,
great. Let us know as soon as you can deliver Umarim.
Cheers, Reto
2011/10/7 David Conger <address@hidden>:
> It will not take long to get the PCBs on the PPZUAV web store. Gerbers were
> only just released. -David
> On Oct 6, 2011, at 7:43 AM, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers wrote:
>
> Dear Michel and Matthieu,
> you made a wonderful and great work with your design.
> I hope, that i can by the PCBs somewhere soon.
>
> Regards
> Heinrich
>
>
>
> Michel GORRAZ schrieb:
>
> Hi all,
>
> We design what we need.
> We release because we are happy when somewhere someone need it also.
> And the more people use it, the more happy we are :)
>
> @+
> Michel
>
> 2011/10/6 Gareth Roberts <address@hidden>
>>
>> Hi Héctor,
>>
>> I'm with Marc on this. I appreciate that Lisa/M or L are technically
>> more powerful, and have an IMU available as an external board.
>>
>> I see the two as complimentary.
>>
>> I like the tiny form factor of the Umarim, the fact that it is pretty
>> much backward compatible with all my airframe files, the onboard IMU and
>> the fact they are less of a hassle to get made up, the firmware is
>> stable and I don't like programming via JTAG. I see it as the spiritual
>> successor of the Tiny.
>>
>> Whilst the Lisa is more powerful, for this project I don't *need* the
>> power. I need the plane to stay the right way up and carry out a
>> flightplan. A standard Tiny/TWOG does everything I want already, I'd
>> just rather have some Umarim's because they are smaller, include IMU,
>> and they get rid of the dreaded 5V switchmode PSU.
>>
>> The STM32 gives a bit more grunt, but if I need more processing grunt
>> I'll lift a beagleboard or gumstix anyway and have access to a proper
>> operating system, drivers, orders of magnitude more power & simpler
>> debugging.
>>
>> My two pence,
>> --G
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 14:21 +0200, Hector Garcia de Marina wrote:
>> > Hello all,
>> >
>> > I have been checking out the board and I really like the design and
>> > layout of the Umarim. On the other hand Lisa/L is based on CortexM3.
>> > In my opinion ARM7 (Umarim) is to step back for new designs, moreover
>> > when the new CortexM4 is currently available.
>> >
>> > Maybe I missing something, and I would like to know what are the
>> > reasons of prefeering Umarim over Lisa/L.
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> >
>> > Héctor.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 2:06 PM, Gareth Roberts
>> > <address@hidden> wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > Nice to see the interest. I'm currently waiting on getting a
>> > quote back
>> > from the manufacturer; when I do I'll have some prices.
>> > I'm in discussions with our accounts department regarding
>> > other people
>> > purchasing boards from us.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Gareth
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, 2011-10-05 at 20:18 +0000, Gareth Roberts wrote:
>> > > Hi all,
>> > >
>> > > I'm planning on getting some Umarim boards made up for a
>> > project we are working on.
>> > > Obviously the bigger the volume the cheaper it's going to
>> > be.
>> > >
>> > > Any UK dwellers interested?
>> > >
>> > > Cheers,
>> > > Gareth
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> > > address@hidden
>> > > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> > address@hidden
>> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Héctor
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> > address@hidden
>> > https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
> ________________________________
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Paparazzi-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/paparazzi-devel
>
>
- [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, (continued)
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Gareth Roberts, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Hector Garcia de Marina, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Gareth Roberts, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Michel GORRAZ, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Gareth Roberts, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Prof. Dr.-Ing. Heinrich Warmers, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, David Conger, 2011/10/07
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim,
Reto Büttner <=
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Nick Sargeant, 2011/10/12
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Felix Ruess, 2011/10/12
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Christophe De Wagter, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Hector Garcia de Marina, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Gareth Roberts, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, antoine drouin, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Gareth Roberts, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, antoine drouin, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Michel GORRAZ, 2011/10/06
- Re: [Paparazzi-devel] Umarim, Gareth Roberts, 2011/10/06