pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-users] Data type errors when compiling pan-0.133 on OS X


From: Benjamin Esham
Subject: [Pan-users] Data type errors when compiling pan-0.133 on OS X
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 15:51:44 -0400
User-agent: Unison/2.0.5

Hello all,

I am trying to compile pan 0.133 on Mac OS X using libraries installed by
fink.  Eventually I get this:

g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I/sw/include/gtk-2.0 -I/sw/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/sw/include/atk-1.0 -I/sw/include/cairo -I/sw/include/pango-1.0 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/freetype2 -I/sw/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -I/usr/X11/include -I/sw/include/gmime-2.0 -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -DPANLOCALEDIR=\""/usr/local/lib/locale"\" -I/sw/include -I/sw/include/glibmm-2.4 -g -O2 -MT gui.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/gui.Tpo -c -o gui.o gui.cc gui.cc: In member function ‘void pan::GUI::set_queue_size_label(unsigned int, unsigned int)’: gui.cc:1763: error: no matching function for call to ‘pan::Queue::get_stats(gulong&, gulong&, gulong&, guint64&, double&, int&, int&, int&)’ ../../pan/tasks/queue.h:142: note: candidates are: void pan::Queue::get_stats(long unsigned int&, long unsigned int&, long unsigned int&, uint64_t&, double&, int&, int&, int&)
make[3]: *** [gui.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [all] Error 2

I gather that these data types are provided by glib; the relevant packages I
have installed are

   glib2-dev                 2.22.4-2
   glib2-shlibs              2.22.4-2
   glibmm2.4                 2.22.2-1
   glibmm2.4-dev             2.22.2-1
   glibmm2.4-shlibs          2.22.2-1

Can anyone suggest how I might fix this error?

Cheers,
--
Benjamin D. Esham
address@hidden
"Faith is the great cop-out, the great excuse to evade the need
to think and evaluate evidence.  Faith is belief in spite of,
even perhaps because of, the lack of evidence."
                                              — Richard Dawkins





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]