Re: mhl nocomponent

[Jon Steinhart]

Ken Hornstein writes:
> >I use MH-E, which does it's header display/hiding outside of MH.  In
> >general, I like to see extra headers, but they have gotten way out of
> >hand from the MS/Outlook space.  We probably need a better list of
> >common "this is junk" header list that probably has to have wildcards in
> >it.
>
> Sigh.  I mean, it seems like this has been expanding, and "everybody
> else" doesn't consider it a problem since every OTHER MUA only shows
> "relevant" headers by default.  Even Robert Elz (who was a long-time
> proponent of showing those headers) finally gave up and deleted the
> extras:nocomponent line in his mhl file:
>
>       https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2021-06/msg00025.html
>
> I am thinking maybe we should change the nmh default mhl files as well
> to recognize current reality (in that thread Ralph also chimed in and
> said the current default doesn't make sense).
>
> --Ken

It does seem like the size of the headers exceeds the size of the body
in a lot of cases :-)

Jon