nmh-workers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh

From: Ralph Corderoy
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 23:13:15 +0000 
Hi Paul,

> most invocations of my wrapper commands record their parent's pid in a
> well-known file.  the wrapper for rmm, when not given a specific
> argument (i.e., "d", rather than "d 32") checks to make sure its
> parent's pid is the same as what's recorded in the file

Nice idea.

Cheers, Ralph.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]