[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh
From: |
Lyndon Nerenberg |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Mar 2016 14:08:23 -0700 |
> IMAP has a somewhat bizarre idea of the transactional state of a mailbox,
> primarily in reference to deleted messages and preserving message reference
> views across multiple client connections
Sorry, I meant to say 'preserving message sequence views'.
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/16
- Message not available
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Conrad Hughes, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ralph Corderoy, 2016/03/17
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2016/03/16
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh,
Lyndon Nerenberg <=
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Jon Steinhart, 2016/03/11
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Ken Hornstein, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Fox, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, norm, 2016/03/12
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, Paul Vixie, 2016/03/12
Re: [Nmh-workers] Future directions for nmh, norm, 2016/03/12