Re: [Nmh-workers] (no subject)

[David Levine]

Ken wrote:

> [David:]
> >
> >Best-first has some appeal to me:  I start at the top, see
> >text/html or something else I can handle, and go with that
> >without bothering to look at the other alternatives.
> 
> Meh.  Everywhere else nmh presents MIME parts in the order in
> which they occur in the message; from what I can tell,
> multipart/alternative was reversed just so the display code
> would be easier to write.  This seems like a lousy exception.

mhlist is a counterexample.  And a good one.

David