[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing

From: Ken Hornstein
Subject: Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing
Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2014 19:25:57 -0400

>> It's worth noting that all of the examples I've seen in RFC 733 and
>> RFC 822 are in the "modern" form;
>Never make the mistake of following the examples.  The [A]BNF is always

I was just trying to point out that even the grammar says that when you want
to have a "display-name", it says to use the modern form.  Comments are
supposed to be ignored.  That's always been the case.  I'm unclear where
the "old" form came from.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]