Re: [Nmh-workers] Thoughts: header/address parsing

[Ken Hornstein]

>> It's worth noting that all of the examples I've seen in RFC 733 and
>> RFC 822 are in the "modern" form;
>
>Never make the mistake of following the examples.  The [A]BNF is always
>normative.

I was just trying to point out that even the grammar says that when you want
to have a "display-name", it says to use the modern form.  Comments are
supposed to be ignored.  That's always been the case.  I'm unclear where
the "old" form came from.

--Ken