[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1
From: |
Ken Hornstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1 |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Jul 2014 20:43:58 -0400 |
>make: *** [install] Error 2
>sbr/dtimep.c:2368:17: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer
>expressions [-Wsign-compare]
>build failed!
>build log is in build_nmh.log
>
>Further unwinding of the problem is that on my amd64 (Mageia 3) system,
>size_t winds up being resolved as an 'unsigned long int' in the gcc 4.7.2
>headers (/path/to/gcc/4.7.2/include/stddef.h). The line in question is:
>
>> for ( i = 0; i < _yybytes_len; ++i )
What version of flex do you have? The version I have (2.5.35) in
yy_scan_bytes() (I assume this is the offending function) declares "i"
using yy_size_t, so there is no error.
The distribution tar file includes the output of flex on dtimep.l, so this
should not be an issue with anyone building from a distribution.
--Ken
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Ken Hornstein, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, heymanj, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Jerry Heyman, 2014/07/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1,
Ken Hornstein <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, Bill Wohler, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/22
Re: [Nmh-workers] What about an nmh-1.6-RC1, David Levine, 2014/07/23