Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers

[Paul Fox]

lyndon wrote:
 > 
 > On 2013-04-03, at 5:25 AM, Paul Fox wrote:
 > 
 > >    $ scan unseen
 > >    ...notice that third-from-end message is spam...
 > >    $ refile unseen_3 +spam
 > 
 > I don't think '_' is a very good choice.  It's too commonly used as a word 
 > separator in text strings.  Why not use the Git convention: unseen~3 ?
 > 

but...  but...   dc predates git!  it must be better!

:-)

i agree that '_' is a little tainted -- i was surprised that it's
not legal in sequence names.  '_' is more mnemonic, for me at
least, but either would be fine.

paul
----------------------
 paul fox, address@hidden (arlington, ma, where it's 28.2 degrees)