[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers
|
From: |
Jerrad Pierce |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers |
|
Date: |
Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:15:15 -0400 |
>digit message numbers. believe me, "p last_4" is much less error
>prone than "p 365530".
Sorry, I wasn't clear. The error-proneness wasn't due to typing,
but in gauging which line of the displayed sequence was the message
you cared about. Although I suppose those who love this mode of
specifying messages might develop a scan format file that includes
sequence indices in the output...
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/01
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, norm, 2013/04/02
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Jerrad Pierce, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers,
Jerrad Pierce <=
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Ken Hornstein, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Paul Fox, 2013/04/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Bill Wohler, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Relative Message Numbers, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/06
- [Nmh-workers] Threads, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Valdis . Kletnieks, 2013/04/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] Threads, Lyndon Nerenberg, 2013/04/06