[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)
From: |
Chad Walstrom |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal) |
Date: |
Thu, 05 Jan 2006 23:02:14 -0600 |
Nathan, regarding your probe into the IMAP world, we had a bit of a
discussion a few years back about creating an nmh-agent application,
similar to ssh-agent, that would hold persistent IMAP connections and
credentials. nmh applications would need to be made "agent"-aware to
take advantage of this.
Here is a web archive of my original post:
http://www.mhonarc.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2002-07/msg00084.html
I made one statement that is not true: "There is one other problem
with getting nmh to work over IMAP. The IMAP daemon's themselves must
understand the MH format." Follow the whole thread. Ken, in fact,
corrected me in the very next post. ;-) There were lots of good ideas
in that thread. See what you think of them.
--
Chad Walstrom <address@hidden> http://www.wookimus.net/
assert(expired(knowledge)); /* core dump */
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), (continued)
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/03
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/05
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Lyndon Nerenberg, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/06
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal),
Chad Walstrom <=
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Bill Wohler, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Mike O'Dell, 2006/01/07
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/08
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal), Mike O'Dell, 2006/01/08
- [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Robert Elz, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Chris Garrigues, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Ken Hornstein, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Josh Bressers, 2006/01/09
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ?, Nathan Bailey, 2006/01/10
- Re: [Nmh-workers] What is MH ? (was: exciting new stuff for 2.0 (IMAP proposal)), Joel Reicher, 2006/01/10