[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0
From: |
Harald Geyer |
Subject: |
Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Dec 2005 19:08:21 +0100 |
> > > * Threading support. This is one of the obvious things missing from
> > > nmh that just about all modern mailers support.
> >
> > I'm not that sure about this. After all it's about e-mail not usenet.
> > I have something like
> >
> > thread () {
> > pick -subject $1 -seq thread
> > scan thread
> > }
> >
> > which does all I need.
>
> well, it doesn't take the "References" or "In-reply-to" headers
> into account.
No, but most of the time this is not necessary. However sortm -thread
would be a nice thing. And pick -thread <message number> too.
> but more importantly, there's no way to easily view messages in a
> sequence (like your "thread", above), sequentially, right? if
> not, then simply getting the message numbers of the thread isn't
> all that useful, since i still can't easily read them in order.
I do
show thread
refile thread +somefolder
...
Breaking in between is some pain, so I don't do that (using screen), but
cur is updated as usual so you sure could make some mark cur-last magic.
> i want to isolate the thread, and then be able to prev and next
> through it. so i think your method might be okay, if there were
> a "-seq" option to prev and next, which meant "next in sequence".
This would be a nice idea ...
- [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, pmaydell, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Harald Geyer, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Paul Fox, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Michael Richardson, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Jerry Peek, 2005/12/22
- Re: [Nmh-workers] exciting new stuff for 2.0, Joel Reicher, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22
- [Nmh-workers] Re: exciting new stuff for 2.0, Bill Wohler, 2005/12/22